Periodontal regenerative therapy with enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of intrabony defects: A prospective 2-year study

被引:19
|
作者
Seshima F. [1 ]
Aoki H. [1 ]
Takeuchi T. [1 ]
Suzuki E. [1 ]
Irokawa D. [1 ]
Makino-Oi A. [1 ]
Sugito H. [2 ,3 ]
Tomita S. [1 ]
Saito A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo
[2] Department of Operative Dentistry, Cariology and Pulp Biology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo
[3] Department of Dental Hygiene, Tokyo Dental Junior College, Tokyo
[4] Oral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo
关键词
Enamel matrix derivative; Periodontal regeneration; Periodontitis;
D O I
10.1186/s13104-017-2572-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To date, enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been considered to be one of the few biomaterials for clinical use capable of demonstrating true periodontal regeneration. The aim of this two-center prospective clinical study was to evaluate 2-year outcome of periodontal regenerative therapy using EMD in the treatment of intrabony defects, performed as an 'advanced medical treatment' under the national healthcare system in Japan. Results: Patients with chronic periodontitis who have completed initial periodontal therapy at either of the two dental school clinics were enrolled. Each contributed at least one intrabony defect of ≥3 mm in depth. During surgery, EMD was applied to the defect following debridement. Twenty-two participants (mean age 55.2 years old, 9 men and 13 women) completed 2-year reevaluation, and a total of 42 defects were subjected to data analysis. Mean gains in clinical attachment level (CAL) at 1 and 2 years were 2.9 mm (38% of baseline CAL) and 3.1 mm (41%), respectively, both showing a significant improvement from baseline. There was also a significant reduction in probing depth (PD): mean reductions at 1 and 2 years were 3.2 and 3.3 mm, respectively. There was a progressive improvement in the mean percentages of bone fill from 26% at 1 year to 36% at 2 years. No significant difference in CAL gain at 2 years was found between 3-wall bone defects and other defect types combined. In multiple regression analysis, the baseline PD was significantly associated with CAL gain at 2 years. In this population of patients, the treatment of intrabony defects with EMD yielded clinically favorable outcomes, as assessed by periodontal and radiographical parameters, over a period of 2 years. © 2017 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Treatment of intrabony defects with an enamel matrix protein (Emdogain®)
    Windisch, P
    Sculean, A
    Gera, I
    Reich, E
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 743 - 743
  • [42] Treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins and guided tissue regeneration - A prospective controlled clinical study
    Sculean, A
    Windisch, P
    Chiantella, GC
    Donos, N
    Brecx, M
    Reich, E
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 28 (05) : 397 - 403
  • [43] Histologic evaluation of human intrabony defects following non-surgical periodontal therapy with and without application of an enamel matrix protein derivative
    Sculean, A
    Windisch, P
    Keglevich, T
    Gera, I
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2003, 74 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [44] Comparative study of DFDBA in combination with enamel matrix derivative versus DFDBA alone for treatment of periodontal intrabony defects at 12 months post-surgery
    Aspriello, Simone Domenico
    Ferrante, Luigi
    Rubini, Corrado
    Piemontese, Matteo
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 15 (02) : 225 - 232
  • [45] Comparative study of DFDBA in combination with enamel matrix derivative versus DFDBA alone for treatment of periodontal intrabony defects at 12 months post-surgery
    Simone Domenico Aspriello
    Luigi Ferrante
    Corrado Rubini
    Matteo Piemontese
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2011, 15 : 225 - 232
  • [46] Enamel matrix proteins in the regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects - A multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial
    Tonetti, MS
    Lang, NP
    Cortellini, P
    Suvan, JE
    Adriaens, P
    Dubravec, D
    Fonzar, A
    Fourmousis, I
    Mayfield, L
    Rossi, R
    Silvestri, M
    Tiedemann, C
    Topoll, H
    Vangsted, T
    Wallkamm, B
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2002, 29 (04) : 317 - 325
  • [47] THE USE OF ONLY ENAMEL MATRIX DERIVATIVE ALLOWS OUTSTANDING REGENERATION RESULTS IN PERIODONTAL INTRABONY DEFECT TREATMENT: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Bertoldi, C.
    Ferrari, M.
    Giannetti, L.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2019, 33 (02): : 633 - 636
  • [48] Enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of partially contained intrabony defects: 12-month results
    Corbella, S.
    Alberti, A.
    Calciolari, E.
    Taschieri, S.
    Francetti, L.
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2019, 64 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [49] Periodontal regenerative therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes using minimally invasive surgical technique with enamel matrix derivative under 3-year observation: A prospective cohort study
    Mizutani, Koji
    Shioyama, Hidehiro
    Matsuura, Takanori
    Mikami, Risako
    Takeda, Kohei
    Izumi, Yuichi
    Aoki, Akira
    Iwata, Takanori
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2021, 92 (09) : 1262 - 1273
  • [50] Clinical safety of enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN(R)) in the treatment of periodontal defects
    Zetterstrom, O
    Andersson, C
    Eriksson, L
    Fredriksson, A
    Friskopp, J
    Heden, G
    Jansson, B
    Lundgren, T
    Nilveus, R
    Olsson, A
    Renvert, S
    Salonen, L
    Sjostrom, L
    Winell, A
    Ostgren, A
    Gestrelius, S
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 24 (09) : 697 - 704