California dominates U.S. emissions of the pesticide and potent greenhouse gas sulfuryl fluoride

被引:0
|
作者
Dylan C. Gaeta
Jens Mühle
Isaac J. Vimont
Molly Crotwell
Lei Hu
John B. Miller
Kathryn McKain
Bianca C. Baier
Mingyang Zhang
Jianing Bao
Benjamin R. Miller
Scot M. Miller
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins University,Department of Environmental Health and Engineering
[2] University of California San Diego,Scripps Institution of Oceanography
[3] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,Global Monitoring Laboratory
[4] University of Colorado Boulder,Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
[5] Clemson University,Department of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2) is a synthetic pesticide and a potent greenhouse gas that is accumulating in the global atmosphere. Rising emissions are a concern since SO2F2 has a relatively long atmospheric lifetime and a high global warming potential. The U.S. is thought to contribute substantially to global SO2F2 emissions, but there is a paucity of information on how emissions of SO2F2 are distributed across the U.S., and there is currently no inventory of SO2F2 emissions for the U.S. or individual states. Here we provide an atmospheric measurement-based estimate of U.S. SO2F2 emissions using high-precision SO2F2 measurements from the NOAA Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network (GGGRN) and a geostatistical inverse model. We find that California has the largest SO2F2 emissions among all U.S. states, with the highest emissions from southern coastal California (Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego counties). Outside of California, only very small and infrequent SO2F2 emissions are detected by our analysis of GGGRN data. We find that California emits 60-85% of U.S. SO2F2 emissions, at a rate of 0.26 ( ± 0.10) Gg yr−1. We estimate that emissions of SO2F2 from California are equal to 5.5–12% of global SO2F2 emissions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contribution of food loss to greenhouse gas assessment of high-value agricultural produce: California production, U.S. consumption
    Qin, Yuwei
    Horvath, Arpad
    Environmental Research Letters, 2021, 16 (01):
  • [22] Predictive modeling of battery degradation and greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. state-level electric vehicle operation
    Fan Yang
    Yuanyuan Xie
    Yelin Deng
    Chris Yuan
    Nature Communications, 9
  • [23] Nitrous oxide dominates greenhouse gas emissions from hydropower's reservoirs in China from 2020 to 2060
    Chen, Hongqiao
    Pan, Hengyu
    Xiao, Shijiang
    Deng, Shihuai
    WATER RESEARCH, 2025, 279
  • [24] Assessing California's progress toward its 2020 greenhouse gas emissions limit
    Mastrandrea, Michael D.
    Inman, Mason
    Cullenward, Danny
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 138
  • [25] Rapid and Convenient Potentiometric Method for Determining Fluorosulfate, a Byproduct of the Fumigant and Greenhouse Gas Sulfuryl Fluoride
    Chen, Zhihao
    Wang, Chengjin
    Pignatello, Joseph J.
    ACS OMEGA, 2024, 9 (21): : 23013 - 23020
  • [26] Water Quality Co-Effects of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in U.S. Agriculture
    Subhrendu K. Pattanayak
    Bruce A. McCarl
    Allan J. Sommer
    Brian C. Murray
    Timothy Bondelid
    Dhazn Gillig
    Benjamin DeAngelo
    Climatic Change, 2005, 71 : 341 - 372
  • [27] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in California rice production
    Brodt, Sonja
    Kendall, Alissa
    Moharnmadi, Yaser
    Arslan, Aslihan
    Yuan, Juhong
    Lee, In-Sung
    Linquist, Bruce
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 169 : 89 - 98
  • [28] Alaska dominates exploration and development activity on U.S. West Coast
    Williams, Bob
    Oil and Gas Journal, 1991, 89 (14): : 50 - 52
  • [29] Assessment of pesticide use in the U.S. potato industry
    Joseph F. Guenthner
    Maury V. Wiese
    Alexander D. Pavlista
    Joseph B. Sieczka
    Jeffrey Wyman
    American Journal of Potato Research, 1999, 76 : 25 - 29
  • [30] New Directions: California's programs for improving air quality and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions
    Croes, Bart E.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 47 : 562 - 563