Limits to reproduction and seed size-number trade-offs that shape forest dominance and future recovery

被引:0
|
作者
Tong Qiu
Robert Andrus
Marie-Claire Aravena
Davide Ascoli
Yves Bergeron
Roberta Berretti
Daniel Berveiller
Michal Bogdziewicz
Thomas Boivin
Raul Bonal
Don C. Bragg
Thomas Caignard
Rafael Calama
J. Julio Camarero
Chia-Hao Chang-Yang
Natalie L. Cleavitt
Benoit Courbaud
Francois Courbet
Thomas Curt
Adrian J. Das
Evangelia Daskalakou
Hendrik Davi
Nicolas Delpierre
Sylvain Delzon
Michael Dietze
Sergio Donoso Calderon
Laurent Dormont
Josep Espelta
Timothy J. Fahey
William Farfan-Rios
Catherine A. Gehring
Gregory S. Gilbert
Georg Gratzer
Cathryn H. Greenberg
Qinfeng Guo
Andrew Hacket-Pain
Arndt Hampe
Qingmin Han
Janneke Hille Ris Lambers
Kazuhiko Hoshizaki
Ines Ibanez
Jill F. Johnstone
Valentin Journé
Daisuke Kabeya
Christopher L. Kilner
Thomas Kitzberger
Johannes M. H. Knops
Richard K. Kobe
Georges Kunstler
Jonathan G. A. Lageard
机构
[1] Duke University,Nicholas School of the Environment
[2] University of Colorado Boulder,Department of Geography
[3] Universidad de Chile,Department of Agriculture, Forest and Food Sciences
[4] Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservacion de la Naturaleza (FCFCN),Forest Research Institute
[5] University of Torino,Department of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of Biology
[6] University of Quebec in Abitibi-Temiscamingue,Department of Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution
[7] Universite Paris-Saclay,USDA Forest Service
[8] Centre national de la recherche scientifique,Instituto Pirenaico de Ecologla
[9] AgroParisTech,Department of Biological Sciences
[10] Ecologie Systematique et Evolution,Natural Resources
[11] Adam Mickiewicz University,Earth and Environment
[12] Institut National de Recherche pour Agriculture,Department of Biological Sciences
[13] Alimentation et Environnement (INRAE),Department of Environmental Studies
[14] Ecologie des Forets Mediterranennes,Department of Geography and Planning, School of Environmental Sciences
[15] Complutense University of Madrid,Department of Environmental Systems Science
[16] Southern Research Station,Department of Biological Environment
[17] Universite Bordeaux,School for Environment and Sustainability
[18] Institut National de Recherche pour Agriculture,Institute of Arctic Biology
[19] Alimentation et Environnement (INRAE),Department of Ecology
[20] Biodiversity,Health and Environmental Sciences Department
[21] Genes,Department of Plant Biology, Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior
[22] and Communities (BIOGECO),Department of Natural Sciences
[23] Centro de Investigacion Forestal - Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CIFOR),Department of Biological Sciences
[24] Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (IPE-CSIC),Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals
[25] National Sun Yat-sen University,Department of Wildland Resources, and the Ecology Center
[26] Cornell University,Department of Biology
[27] Universite Grenoble Alpes,Department of Biology
[28] Institut National de Recherche pour Agriculture,Department of Biology
[29] Alimentation et Environnement (INRAE),Department of forestry and renewable forest resources, Biotechnical Faculty
[30] Laboratoire EcoSystemes et Societes En Montagne (LESSEM),Tohoku Research Center
[31] Aix Marseille universite,Inst. de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia de Sevilla
[32] Institut National de Recherche pour Agriculture,W. Szafer Institute of Botany
[33] Alimentation et Environnement (INRAE),Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship
[34] USGS Western Ecological Research Center,Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology
[35] Institute of Mediterranean and Forest Ecosystems,Department of Biologia Vegetal y Ecologia
[36] Boston University,Department of Biology
[37] Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE),Department of Biology
[38] Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS),Department of Environmental Science and Ecology
[39] Centre de Recerca Ecologica i Aplicacions Forestals (CREAF),Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Ecology and Sustainability
[40] Washington University in Saint Louis,Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology
[41] Center for Conservation and Sustainable Development,Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences
[42] Missouri Botanical Garden, Production, Territory
[43] Northern Arizona University,Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship
[44] University of California,Botany, School of Environmental and Rural Science
[45] Institute of Forest Ecology,Department of Environmental Sciences
[46] Bent Creek Experimental Forest,undefined
[47] USDA Forest Service,undefined
[48] Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center,undefined
[49] USDA Forest Service,undefined
[50] Southern Research Station,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The relationships that control seed production in trees are fundamental to understanding the evolution of forest species and their capacity to recover from increasing losses to drought, fire, and harvest. A synthesis of fecundity data from 714 species worldwide allowed us to examine hypotheses that are central to quantifying reproduction, a foundation for assessing fitness in forest trees. Four major findings emerged. First, seed production is not constrained by a strict trade-off between seed size and numbers. Instead, seed numbers vary over ten orders of magnitude, with species that invest in large seeds producing more seeds than expected from the 1:1 trade-off. Second, gymnosperms have lower seed production than angiosperms, potentially due to their extra investments in protective woody cones. Third, nutrient-demanding species, indicated by high foliar phosphorus concentrations, have low seed production. Finally, sensitivity of individual species to soil fertility varies widely, limiting the response of community seed production to fertility gradients. In combination, these findings can inform models of forest response that need to incorporate reproductive potential.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimizing modern family size: Trade-offs between fertility and the economic costs of reproduction
    Lawson D.W.
    Mace R.
    Human Nature, 2010, 21 (1) : 39 - 61
  • [22] Reproduction and immunity trade-offs constrain mating signals and nuptial gift size in a bushcricket
    Barbosa, Flavia
    Rebar, Darren
    Greenfield, Michael D.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 27 (01) : 109 - 117
  • [23] Growing up aspen: ontogeny and trade-offs shape growth, defence and reproduction in a foundation species
    Cole, Christopher T.
    Morrow, Clay J.
    Barker, Hilary L.
    Rubert-Nason, Kennedy F.
    Riehl, Jennifer F. L.
    Koellner, Tobias G.
    Lackus, Nathalie D.
    Lindroth, Richard L.
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2021, 127 (04) : 505 - 517
  • [24] Smaller amphipod mothers show stronger trade-offs between offspring size and number
    Glazier, DS
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2000, 3 (02) : 142 - 149
  • [25] Genetic Dissection of Grain Size and Grain Number Trade-Offs in CIMMYT Wheat Germplasm
    Griffiths, Simon
    Wingen, Luzie
    Pietragalla, Julian
    Garcia, Guillermo
    Hasan, Ahmed
    Miralles, Daniel
    Calderini, Daniel F.
    Ankleshwaria, Jignaben Bipinchandra
    Waite, Michelle Leverington
    Simmonds, James
    Snape, John
    Reynolds, Matthew
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03):
  • [27] Defaunation effects on plant recruitment depend on size matching and size trade-offs in seed-dispersal networks
    Donoso, Isabel
    Schleuning, Matthias
    Garcia, Daniel
    Fruend, Jochen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 284 (1855)
  • [28] Female fertility per flower and trade-offs between size and number in Claytonia virginica (Portulacaceae)
    Morgan, MT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1998, 85 (09) : 1231 - 1236
  • [29] Looking to the past to shape the future: addressing social-ecological change and adaptive trade-offs
    Colin Grier
    Lilian Alessa
    Andrew Kliskey
    Regional Environmental Change, 2017, 17 : 1205 - 1215
  • [30] WHY ARE TRADE-OFFS BETWEEN FLOWER SIZE AND NUMBER INFREQUENTLY DETECTED? A TEST OF THREE HYPOTHESES
    Caruso, Christina M.
    Maherali, Hafiz
    Benscoter, Allison M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES, 2012, 173 (01) : 26 - 35