eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants

被引:0
|
作者
Louise Nørgaard
Carsten Riis Olesen
Kristian Trøjelsgaard
Cino Pertoldi
Jeppe Lund Nielsen
Pierre Taberlet
Aritz Ruiz-González
Marta De Barba
Laura Iacolina
机构
[1] Aalborg University,Department of Chemistry and Bioscience
[2] Monash University,School of Biological Sciences
[3] Danmarks Jægerforbund,CNRS, Laboratoire D’Ecologie Alpine (LECA)
[4] Aalborg Zoo,Department of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology
[5] Univ. Grenoble Alpes,Lascaray Research Center
[6] UiT – The Arctic University of Norway,Department of Biodiversity
[7] Tromsø Museum,undefined
[8] University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU,undefined
[9] University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU),undefined
[10] University of Primorska,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With an accelerating negative impact of anthropogenic actions on natural ecosystems, non-invasive biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly crucial. As a consequence, the interest in the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques has increased. The use of eDNA extracted from faeces from generalist predators, have recently been described as “biodiversity capsules” and suggested as a complementary tool for improving current biodiversity assessments. In this study, using faecal samples from two generalist omnivore species, the Eurasian badger and the red fox, we evaluated the applicability of eDNA metabarcoding in determining dietary composition, compared to macroscopic diet identification techniques. Subsequently, we used the dietary information obtained to assess its contribution to biodiversity assessments. Compared to classic macroscopic techniques, we found that eDNA metabarcoding detected more taxa, at higher taxonomic resolution, and proved to be an important technique to verify the species identification of the predator from field collected faeces. Furthermore, we showed how dietary analyses complemented field observations in describing biodiversity by identifying consumed flora and fauna that went unnoticed during field observations. While diet analysis approaches could not substitute field observations entirely, we suggest that their integration with other methods might overcome intrinsic limitations of single techniques in future biodiversity surveys.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Landscape analyses using eDNA metabarcoding and Earth observation predict community biodiversity in California
    Lin, Meixi
    Simons, Ariel Levi
    Harrigan, Ryan J.
    Curd, Emily E.
    Schneider, Fabian D.
    Ruiz-Ramos, Dannise V.
    Gold, Zack
    Osborne, Melisa G.
    Shirazi, Sabrina
    Schweizer, Teia M.
    Moore, Tiara N.
    Fox, Emma A.
    Turba, Rachel
    Garcia-Vedrenne, Ana E.
    Helman, Sarah K.
    Rutledge, Kelsi
    Mejia, Maura Palacios
    Marwayana, Onny
    Munguia Ramos, Miroslava N.
    Wetzer, Regina
    Pentcheff, N. Dean
    McTavish, Emily Jane
    Dawson, Michael N.
    Shapiro, Beth
    Wayne, Robert K.
    Meyer, Rachel S.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2021, 31 (06)
  • [32] Combining sampling gear to optimally inventory species highlights the efficiency of eDNA metabarcoding
    Andres, Kara J.
    Lambert, Timothy D.
    Lodge, David M.
    Andres, Jose
    Jackson, James R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2023, 5 (01): : 146 - 157
  • [33] Evaluation of soil biodiversity in alpine habitats through eDNA metabarcoding and relationships with environmental features
    Rota N.
    Canedoli C.
    Ferrè C.
    Ficetola G.F.
    Guerrieri A.
    Padoa-Schioppa E.
    Forests, 2020, 11 (11):
  • [34] Fine-tuning biodiversity assessments: A framework to pair eDNA metabarcoding and morphological approaches
    Lucio Pereira, Catia
    Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
    Bastos Araujo, Miguel
    Graca Matias, Miguel
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 12 (12): : 2397 - 2409
  • [35] Putting eDNA to the test: A field comparison of eDNA metabarcoding to established protocols for assessing biodiversity in Missouri's Ozark Highland streams
    Lee, Veronica M.
    Berkman, Leah K.
    Geheber, Aaron D.
    Landwer, Brett
    Ludwig, Eric J.
    Duvernell, David D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2024, 6 (01):
  • [36] Validation and development of eDNA metabarcoding primers for comprehensive assessment of Chinese amphibians
    Wu, Dongyi
    Lee, Pingshin
    Chen, Hongman
    Yan, Fang
    Huang, Jiayue
    He, Yanhong
    Wu, Ruiyao
    Yuan, Zhiyong
    INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY, 2024,
  • [37] eDNA metabarcoding in zooplankton improves the ecological status assessment of aquatic ecosystems
    Yang, Jianghua
    Zhang, Xiaowei
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 134
  • [38] Comparing eDNA metabarcoding and conventional pelagic netting to inform biodiversity monitoring in deep ocean environments
    Cote, D.
    McClenaghan, B.
    Desforges, J.
    Fahner, N. A.
    Hajibabaei, M.
    Chawarski, J.
    Roul, S.
    Singer, G.
    Aubry, C.
    Geoffroy, M.
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 80 (10) : 2545 - 2562
  • [39] Metabarcoding meiofauna biodiversity assessment in four beaches of Northern Colombia: effects of sampling protocols and primer choice
    Castro, Lyda R.
    Meyer, Rachel S.
    Shapiro, Beth
    Shirazi, Sabrina
    Cutler, Samuel
    Lagos, Ana M.
    Quiroga, Sigmer Y.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2021, 848 (15) : 3407 - 3426
  • [40] Biodiversity of Nematodes from Coral Reef Sediments in the South China Sea Based on eDNA Metabarcoding
    An, Lei
    Wang, Aiyang
    Zhang, Zheng
    Ren, Xiaoliang
    Sha, Zhongli
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2024, 16 (07):