eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants

被引:0
|
作者
Louise Nørgaard
Carsten Riis Olesen
Kristian Trøjelsgaard
Cino Pertoldi
Jeppe Lund Nielsen
Pierre Taberlet
Aritz Ruiz-González
Marta De Barba
Laura Iacolina
机构
[1] Aalborg University,Department of Chemistry and Bioscience
[2] Monash University,School of Biological Sciences
[3] Danmarks Jægerforbund,CNRS, Laboratoire D’Ecologie Alpine (LECA)
[4] Aalborg Zoo,Department of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology
[5] Univ. Grenoble Alpes,Lascaray Research Center
[6] UiT – The Arctic University of Norway,Department of Biodiversity
[7] Tromsø Museum,undefined
[8] University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU,undefined
[9] University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU),undefined
[10] University of Primorska,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With an accelerating negative impact of anthropogenic actions on natural ecosystems, non-invasive biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly crucial. As a consequence, the interest in the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques has increased. The use of eDNA extracted from faeces from generalist predators, have recently been described as “biodiversity capsules” and suggested as a complementary tool for improving current biodiversity assessments. In this study, using faecal samples from two generalist omnivore species, the Eurasian badger and the red fox, we evaluated the applicability of eDNA metabarcoding in determining dietary composition, compared to macroscopic diet identification techniques. Subsequently, we used the dietary information obtained to assess its contribution to biodiversity assessments. Compared to classic macroscopic techniques, we found that eDNA metabarcoding detected more taxa, at higher taxonomic resolution, and proved to be an important technique to verify the species identification of the predator from field collected faeces. Furthermore, we showed how dietary analyses complemented field observations in describing biodiversity by identifying consumed flora and fauna that went unnoticed during field observations. While diet analysis approaches could not substitute field observations entirely, we suggest that their integration with other methods might overcome intrinsic limitations of single techniques in future biodiversity surveys.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants
    Norgaard, Louise
    Olesen, Carsten Riis
    Trojelsgaard, Kristian
    Pertoldi, Cino
    Nielsen, Jeppe Lund
    Taberlet, Pierre
    Ruiz-Gonzalez, Aritz
    De Barba, Marta
    Iacolina, Laura
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [2] Effect of eDNA metabarcoding temporal sampling strategies on detection of coastal biodiversity
    Sevellec, Maelle
    Lacoursiere-Roussel, Anais
    Normandeau, Eric
    Bernatchez, Louis
    Howland, Kimberly Lynn
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2025, 12
  • [3] Nuclear eDNA metabarcoding primers for anthozoan coral biodiversity assessment
    McCartin, Luke
    Saso, Emma
    Vohsen, Samuel A.
    Pittoors, Nicole
    Demetriades, Penny
    McFadden, Catherine S.
    Quattrini, Andrea M.
    Herrera, Santiago
    PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [4] Biodiversity Assessment of a Mississippi River Backwater Complex Using eDNA Metabarcoding
    Ludwig, Eric J.
    Lee, Veronica M.
    Berkman, Leah K.
    Geheber, Aaron D.
    Duvernell, David D.
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2024, 16 (08):
  • [5] Combined use of eDNA metabarcoding and video surveillance for the assessment of fish biodiversity
    Stat, Michael
    John, Jeffrey
    DiBattista, Joseph D.
    Newman, Stephen J.
    Bunce, Michael
    Harvey, Euan S.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (01) : 196 - 205
  • [6] Environmental DNA (eDNA) Metabarcoding as a Sustainable Tool of Coastal Biodiversity Assessment
    Hariz, Z. A. Danial
    Adelyna, M. A. Noor
    UNIVERSITIES AS LIVING LABS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: SUPPORTING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS, 2020, : 211 - 225
  • [7] Biodiversity assessment of tropical shelf eukaryotic communities via pelagic eDNA metabarcoding
    Bakker, Judith
    Wangensteen, Owen S.
    Baillie, Charles
    Buddo, Dayne
    Chapman, Demian D.
    Gallagher, Austin J.
    Guttridge, Tristan L.
    Hertler, Heidi
    Mariani, Stefano
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (24): : 14341 - 14355
  • [8] Application of eDNA metabarcoding in the assessment of fish biodiversity in Philippine mangroves: Challenges and opportunities
    Naputo, Camila Frances P.
    Isowa, Yukinobu
    Gerona-Daga, Maria Elisa
    Artigas, Ma. Daniela
    Kajita, Tadashi
    Salmo III, Severino G.
    REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2024, 77
  • [9] Evaluating eDNA and eRNA metabarcoding for aquatic biodiversity assessment: From bacteria to vertebrates
    Zhang, Yan
    Qiu, Yu
    Liu, Kai
    Zhong, Wenjun
    Yang, Jianghua
    Altermatt, Florian
    Zhang, Xiaowei
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ECOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21
  • [10] Fish community assessment with eDNA metabarcoding: effects of sampling design and bioinformatic filtering
    Evans, Nathan T.
    Li, Yiyuan
    Renshaw, Mark A.
    Olds, Brett P.
    Deiner, Kristy
    Turner, Cameron R.
    Jerde, Christopher L.
    Lodge, David M.
    Lamberti, Gary A.
    Pfrender, Michael E.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2017, 74 (09) : 1362 - 1374