Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy–a Contemporary Review

被引:0
|
作者
Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat
S. K. Raghunath
N. Srivatsa
C. Tejus
K. Vishruth
R. Anil Kumar
机构
[1] Trustwell Hospital,
[2] HCG Hospital,undefined
来源
关键词
Radical prostatectomy; Potency; Continence; RALP; Laparoscopic prostatectomy.;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prostatectomy has been widely accepted as a treatment option for prostate cancer and can be performed via an open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach. The outcomes following prostatectomy are primarily sub-grouped into oncological and functional outcomes. Oncological outcomes have been comparable in the above three surgical modalities. However, the robotic platform seems to have a better functional outcome compared to open prostatectomy. The data on the outcome of the laparoscopic approach is scarce and is not widely performed due to technical difficulty. With experience continence outcomes have reached a plateau in many robotic series, however, the potency outcome is the real Achilles tendon of this procedure. Many factors influence potency outcomes but the amount and quality of nerve-sparing is one factor that is under a surgeon’s control and it improves with experience.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 588
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PATIENT SAFETY AND THE DIFFUSION OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Parsons, J. Kellogg
    Palazzi-Churas, Kerrin
    Stroup, Sean
    Chang, David
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E24 - E25
  • [22] The suspension sutures during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy
    Theodoros Tokas
    Udo Nagele
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 1987 - 1988
  • [23] Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition, transformation, and transcendence
    Kan, R. W. M.
    Ng, C. M.
    Kan, C. F.
    Ngai, H. Y.
    To, H. C.
    Ho, L. Y.
    Chan, S. W. H.
    Au, W. H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 : 16 - 16
  • [24] The suspension sutures during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy
    Tokas, Theodoros
    Nagele, Udo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (12) : 1987 - 1988
  • [25] Effect of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in older men
    Adejoro, Oluwakayode
    Gupta, Priyanka
    Ziegelmann, Matthew
    Weight, Christopher
    Konety, Badrinath
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (05) : 234.e1 - 234.e11
  • [26] Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Now safe and efficacious
    Costello, AJ
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 74 (12) : 1038 - 1038
  • [27] Is previous radical prostatectomy a contraindication to minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair? A contemporary meta-analysis
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Bona, Davide
    Cali, Matteo
    Manara, Michele
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Cavalli, Marta
    Bruni, Piero Giovanni
    Carmignani, Luca
    Danelli, Piergiorgio
    Bonavina, Luigi
    Koeckerling, Ferdinand
    Campanelli, Giampiero
    HERNIA, 2024, 28 (05) : 1525 - 1536
  • [28] Contemporary review of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Dai, Rui
    Turley, Ryan S.
    Blazer, Dan G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 8 (12): : 784 - 791
  • [29] Contemporary Rates and Predictors of Open Conversion During Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer
    Luzzago, Stefano
    Rosiello, Giuseppe
    Pecoraro, Angela
    Deuker, Marina
    Stolzenbach, Franziska
    Mistretta, Francesco Alessandro
    Tian, Zhe
    Musi, Gennaro
    Montanari, Emanuele
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Saad, Fred
    Briganti, Alberto
    de Cobelli, Ottavio
    Karakiewicz, Pierre, I
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2020, 34 (05) : 600 - 607
  • [30] OUTCOMES OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN VERY OBESE MEN USING AN EXTRAPERITONEAL MINIMALLY-INVASIVE APPROACH
    Sundi, Debasish
    Reese, Adam C.
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Mettee, Lynda Z.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E209 - E209