Evaluating the product quality level under multiple L-type quality characteristics

被引:0
|
作者
W.M. Chan
R.N. Ibrahim
P.B. Lochert
机构
[1] Monash University,Department of Mechanical Engineering
关键词
Larger-the-better quality characteristics; Multivariate quality loss function; Product quality; Quality cost ;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the most critical issues encountered in the area of quality engineering is the selection of an appropriate quality loss function to relate key quality characteristics of a product to its quality performance. The loss function can be used to evaluate the quality loss in terms of monetary units that enables managers to quantify unobservable costs. It aids manufacturers to evaluate quality improvement projects more rigorously, hence, the choice of paths for quality enrichment depends on the type of loss function. Although several multivariate quality loss functions have been proposed, these models only considered the-nominal-the-best (N-type) quality characteristics. The effect of other types of quality characteristics was not addressed. In this paper, a cost model is proposed to evaluate the quality level of a product with multiple the-larger-the-better (L-type) quality characteristics. An example with two quality characteristics is given to illustrate the application.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 95
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DESIGNING THE OPTIMUM CONFIGURATIONS OF CIRCULAR AND SPHERICAL PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS FOR MULTIPLE QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS
    Byung Rae CHO
    Michael D. PHILLIPS
    Jami KOVACH
    JournalofSystemsScienceandSystemsEngineering, 2005, (04) : 385 - 399
  • [22] Designing the optimum configurations of circular and spherical product specifications for multiple quality characteristics
    Byung Rae Cho
    Michael D. Phillips
    Jami Kovach
    Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2005, 14 (4) : 385 - 399
  • [23] Drying characteristics and product quality of okra
    Shivhare, US
    Gupta, A
    Bawa, AS
    Gupta, P
    DRYING TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 18 (1-2) : 409 - 419
  • [24] Erratum to: Estimating sectoral product quality under quality heterogeneity
    Xian-Liang Tian
    Review of World Economics, 2017, 153 : 177 - 177
  • [25] A method for evaluating the benchmarking level of power quality
    Shen, Min-xuan
    Wang, Tong-xun
    Liu, Ying-ying
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY (POWERCON), 2018, : 204 - 211
  • [26] Evaluating quality of service for service level agreements
    Clark, Allan
    Gilmore, Stephen
    FORMAL METHODS: APPLICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 4346 : 181 - +
  • [27] Research on Product Using Quality Level Evaluation
    Song, Jinghua
    Guo, Qisheng
    Zhao, Liang
    Li, Liang
    2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY, RELIABILITY, RISK, MAINTENANCE, AND SAFETY ENGINEERING (ICQR2MSE), 2012, : 1108 - 1111
  • [28] An iterative method for evaluating product quality and user reputation
    Liang, Bo
    Jiang, Shan
    Dou, Liya
    Wang, Lin
    Wang, Xiaofan
    2018 37TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2018, : 9714 - 9719
  • [29] A Clinical Framework for Evaluating Cannabis Product Quality and Safety
    MacCallum, Caroline A.
    Lo, Lindsay A.
    Pistawka, Carly A.
    Boivin, Michael
    CANNABIS AND CANNABINOID RESEARCH, 2023, 8 (03) : 567 - 574
  • [30] Solution of the Decentralized Task of Evaluating and Improving Product Quality
    Pipiay, G. T.
    Chernenkaya, L., V
    Mager, V. E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - FAR EAST CON (ISCFEC 2020), 2020, 128 : 2840 - 2846