The reaction of methyl peroxy and hydroxyl radicals as a major source of atmospheric methanol

被引:0
|
作者
Jean-François Müller
Zhen Liu
Vinh Son Nguyen
Trissevgeni Stavrakou
Jeremy N. Harvey
Jozef Peeters
机构
[1] Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy,Atmospheric Composition Department
[2] University of Leuven,Department of Chemistry
[3] State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering,undefined
[4] East China University of Science and Technology,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Methyl peroxy, a key radical in tropospheric chemistry, was recently shown to react with the hydroxyl radical at an unexpectedly high rate. Here, the molecular reaction mechanisms are elucidated using high-level quantum chemical methodologies and statistical rate theory. Formation of activated methylhydrotrioxide, followed by dissociation into methoxy and hydroperoxy radicals, is found to be the main reaction pathway, whereas methylhydrotrioxide stabilization and methanol formation (from activated and stabilized methylhydrotrioxide) are viable minor channels. Criegee intermediate formation is found to be negligible. Given the theoretical uncertainties, useful constraints on the yields are provided by atmospheric methanol measurements. Using a global chemistry-transport model, we show that the only explanation for the high observed methanol abundances over remote oceans is the title reaction with an overall methanol yield of ∼30%, consistent with the theoretical estimates given their uncertainties. This makes the title reaction a major methanol source (115 Tg per year), comparable to global terrestrial emissions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unimolecular Reactions of Peroxy Radicals in Atmospheric Chemistry and Combustion
    Glowacki, David R.
    Pilling, Michael J.
    CHEMPHYSCHEM, 2010, 11 (18) : 3836 - 3843
  • [32] H migration in peroxy radicals under atmospheric conditions
    Vereecken, Luc
    Noziere, Barbara
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2020, 20 (12) : 7429 - 7458
  • [33] Atmospheric chemistry of methylcyctopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl: Photolysis, reaction with hydroxyl radicals and ozone
    Wallington, TJ
    Sokolov, O
    Hurley, MD
    Tyndall, GS
    Orlando, JJ
    Barnes, I
    Becker, KH
    Vogt, R
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (23) : 4232 - 4238
  • [34] Kinetic Parameters of the Reaction of Isobornylphenols with Peroxy Radicals
    Mazaletskaya, L. I.
    Sheludchenko, N. I.
    Shishkina, L. N.
    Kuchin, A. V.
    Fedorova, I. V.
    Chukicheva, I. Yu
    PETROLEUM CHEMISTRY, 2011, 51 (05) : 348 - 353
  • [35] Kinetic parameters of the reaction of isobornylphenols with peroxy radicals
    L. I. Mazaletskaya
    N. I. Sheludchenko
    L. N. Shishkina
    A. V. Kuchin
    I. V. Fedorova
    I. Yu. Chukicheva
    Petroleum Chemistry, 2011, 51 : 348 - 353
  • [36] The reaction of acetylene with hydroxyl radicals
    Senosiain, JP
    Klippenstein, SJ
    Miller, JA
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2005, 109 (27): : 6045 - 6055
  • [37] PHYS 640-Branching ratios for the reaction of hydroperoxy radicals with propionyl peroxy and butionyl peroxy radicals
    Singh, Sukhdeep
    Ibarra, Yesenia
    Hasson, Alam S.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 235
  • [38] IMPACT OF NATURAL HYDROCARBONS ON HYDROXYL AND PEROXY-RADICALS AT A REMOTE SITE
    TRAINER, M
    HSIE, EY
    MCKEEN, SA
    TALLAMRAJU, R
    PARRISH, DD
    FEHSENFELD, FC
    LIU, SC
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1987, 92 (D10): : 11879 - 11894
  • [39] The potential controlled Fenton reaction at liquid|liquid interfaces as the source of hydroxyl radicals
    Brusová, Z
    Stulík, K
    Marecek, K
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 563 (02) : 277 - 281
  • [40] SO2 formation and peroxy radical isomerization in the atmospheric reaction of OH radicals with dimethyl disulfide
    Berndt, Torsten
    Chen, Jing
    Moller, Kristian H.
    Hyttinen, Noora
    Prisle, Nonne L.
    Tilgner, Andreas
    Hoffmann, Erik H.
    Herrmann, Hartmut
    Kjaergaard, Henrik G.
    CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 56 (88) : 13634 - 13637