Are Politically Endorsed Firms More Socially Responsible? Selective Engagement in Corporate Social Responsibility

被引:0
|
作者
Xiaowei Rose Luo
Danqing Wang
机构
[1] INSEAD,Department of Entrepreneurship and Family Enterprise
[2] Boulevard De Constance,School of Business and Management
[3] The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology,undefined
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2021年 / 170卷
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Political endorsement; Transitional economy; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The state plays a major role in corporate social responsibility (CSR) in emerging and transitional economies and often influences firms through political connection, and hence knowing how firms respond to the state’s CSR initiatives can inform policy making and has important implication on the sustainability of society and environment. However, existent studies show conflicting results on politically connected firms’ CSR participation. We examine the relationship between political endorsement and firms’ engagement in different types of CSR simultaneously. Using a representative sample of more than 1,000 private firms in the early 2000s, we find that politically endorsed firms engage more in philanthropic donation, but less in environmental practices, which impose higher costs and constraints than philanthropy. This is consistent with our explanation that they attempt to maintain legitimacy and discretion through selective engagement in CSR. Our study contributes to research on CSR in transitional economies by reconciling conflicting findings about the CSR engagement of politically connected firms, provides a new lens to illuminate firms’ strategic response in CSR, and has important policy implications.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 555
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are Politically Endorsed Firms More Socially Responsible? Selective Engagement in Corporate Social Responsibility
    Luo, Xiaowei Rose
    Wang, Danqing
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2021, 170 (03) : 535 - 555
  • [2] E-corporate social responsibility in socially responsible firms: the case of Spanish firms
    Chaves, Rafael
    Mozas, Adoracion
    Puentes, Raquel
    Bernal, Enrique
    SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2011, 31 (12): : 2033 - 2050
  • [3] Corporate social responsibility and pay ratio: why do socially responsible firms pay their employees more?
    Koo K.
    International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 2024, 24 (03) : 244 - 265
  • [4] Are Members of Business for Social Responsibility More Socially Responsible?
    Tashman, Peter
    Rivera, Jorge
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2010, 38 (03) : 487 - 514
  • [5] Are socially responsible firms responsible to accounting? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management
    Shi, Hao
    Liu, Haijian
    Wu, Yixue
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2024, 22 (03) : 500 - 526
  • [6] Corporate Social Responsibility and Socially Responsible Investing: A Global Perspective
    Ronald Paul Hill
    Thomas Ainscough
    Todd Shank
    Daryl Manullang
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2007, 70 : 165 - 174
  • [7] Corporate social responsibility and socially responsible investing: A global perspective
    Hill, Ronald Paul
    Ainscough, Thomas
    Shank, Todd
    Manullang, Daryl
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 70 (02) : 165 - 174
  • [8] Do socially responsible audit firms provide higher audit quality? An investigation of corporate social responsibility activity in audit firms
    Chen, Hanwen
    Liu, Siyi
    Liu, Xin
    Wang, Jiani
    MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2023, 38 (02) : 206 - 240
  • [9] WHY ACTIVIST HEDGE FUNDS TARGET SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FIRMS: THE REACTION COSTS OF SIGNALING CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
    DesJardine, Mark R.
    Marti, Emilio
    Durand, Rodolphe
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 64 (03): : 851 - 872
  • [10] A study on the earnings response coefficient (ERC) of socially responsible firms: Legal environment and stages of corporate social responsibility
    Kim, Yoo Chan
    Seol, Inshik
    Kang, Yun Sik
    MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2018, 41 (09): : 1010 - 1032