The biogeochemical redox paradox: how can we make a foundational concept more predictive of biogeochemical state changes?

被引:0
|
作者
A. J. Burgin
T. D. Loecke
机构
[1] University of Kansas,Kansas Biological Survey – Center for Ecological Research
来源
Biogeochemistry | 2023年 / 164卷
关键词
Oxidation reduction reactions; Redox; Ecological resilience and resistance; Redox buffering; Redox potential;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Oxidation–reduction (redox) ladders are a fundamental biogeochemical concept that explain basic and applied phenomena including microbial metabolic evolution and chemical pollution remediation. However, it is difficult to measure and predict which redox couples dominate an environment. This discrepancy manifests a redox paradox: while redox ladders are a fundamental biogeochemical concept, it is difficult to use existing measurements to predict which redox couples dominate in an environment or use redox to predict biogeochemical state changes. Additionally, there is often confusion around the concept due to the differential emphasis in biological vs. geochemical sub-disciplines in explanations of the: (1) roles of actual vs. standard free energy calculations, (2) thermodynamics vs. enzymatic kinetics in reactions, (3) ubiquity of alternative electron donors as opposed to assuming processes are solely driven by organic carbon, and (4) difference between redox intensity and redox buffering capacity. Redox buffering capacity is a particularly underdeveloped concept within biogeochemical studies, which have largely used redox potential, a measurement with myriad analytical concerns. We review the small number of studies that have quantified redox buffering capacity. We highlight four challenges to overcome before redox buffering capacity can be a useful concept. Measuring redox buffering capacity may be key to understanding the ability of the ecosystems to resist change in redox conditions. Biogeochemists are often most interested in predicting these state changes to understand hot spot/hot moment phenomena such as greenhouse gas fluxes; thus, incorporating redox buffering capacity into our predictive frameworks and methodological toolbox may be key to unlocking the redox paradox. We postulate that the well-known ecological resilience and resistance framework constitutes the needed theoretical foundation on which measurements of redox buffering capacity can be incorporated.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 370
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Can We Make Pump and Treat Systems More Energetically Sustainable?
    Casasso, Alessandro
    Tosco, Tiziana
    Bianco, Carlo
    Bucci, Arianna
    Sethi, Rajandrea
    WATER, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [22] Why we need a more sociable approach to bipolar disorder and how we can make it happen
    Lobban, Fiona
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2021, 23 (07) : 656 - 658
  • [23] How Can We Teach the Chemical Elements to Make the Memorization Task More Enjoyable?
    Joaquin Franco-Mariscal, Antonio
    FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENCE, 2014, 19 (02) : 185 - 188
  • [24] How Can We Teach the Chemical Elements to Make the Memorization Task More Enjoyable?
    Antonio Joaquín Franco-Mariscal
    Foundations of Science, 2014, 19 : 185 - 188
  • [25] How can we make farm EMS placements more inspiring and accessible for all?
    Horwood, Paul
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2025, 196 (01) : 43 - 44
  • [26] How can we make renal medicine careers more appealing to UK trainees?
    Karangizi, Alvin H. K.
    Chanouzas, Dimitrios
    Mahdi, Amar
    Foggensteiner, Lukas
    CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2019, 12 (05) : 756 - 759
  • [27] How can we make measures of psychotic depression symptoms more clinically useful?
    Fava, M.
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 129 (03) : 161 - 162
  • [28] Natural hazards education in Australian schools: How can we make it more effective?
    Dufty, Neil
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 24 (02): : 13 - 16
  • [30] Visualizing for Success: How Can we Make the User more Efficient in Interactive Evolutionary Algorithms?
    Merelo, Juan-J.
    Garcia-Valdez, Mario
    Cotta, Carlos
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'16 COMPANION), 2016, : 1427 - 1428