Final pathohistology after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS)

被引：0
|
作者：
Ekaterina Lellig
Christian Gratzke
Alexander Kretschmer
Christian Stief
机构：
[1] Institution Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich,Department of Urology
来源：
World Journal of Urology | 2015年 / 33卷
关键词：
Prostate cancer; Insignificant; Active surveillance;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：917 / 922
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PATHOLOGIC FINDINGS AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY OF PATIENT'S ELIGIBLE FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE: STRATIFICATION BY SELECTION CRITERIA AND RACE
    DeLay, Kenneth
    Williams, Michael
    Beydoun, Hind
    Given, Robert
    Lance, Raymond
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E603 - E603
  • [32] GENOMIC SIGNATURES ASSOCIATED WITH ADVERSE PATHOLOGIC FEATURES AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AMONG ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE ELIGIBLE MEN
    Li, Eric Victor
    Proudfoot, James
    Kundu, Nalin
    Neill, Clayton
    Davicioni, Elai
    Schaeffer, Edward
    Patel, Hiten
    Ross, Ashley
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E676 - E676
  • [33] Pathological outcome for Chinese patients with low-risk prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance and undergoing radical prostatectomy: comparison of six different active surveillance protocols
    Tsang, C. F.
    Tsu, James H. L.
    Lai, Terence C. T.
    Wong, K. W.
    Ho, Brian S. H.
    Ng, Ada T. L.
    Ma, W. K.
    Yiu, M. K.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (06) : 609 - 615
  • [34] PATIENTS ELIGIBLE FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE WHO CHOSE TO UNDERGO PROSTATECTOMY: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROSTATE CANCER FEATURES ON BIOPSY AND FINAL PATHOLOGIC REPORT
    Katz, Benjamin
    Yu, Sue-Jean
    Llukani, Elton
    Lightfoot, Andrew
    Monahan, Kelly
    McGill, Alice
    Lee, David
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E516 - E516
  • [35] The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?
    Verep, Samed
    Erdem, Selcuk
    Ozluk, Yasemin
    Kilicaslan, Isin
    Sanli, Oner
    Ozcan, Faruk
    PROSTATE, 2019, 79 (13): : 1523 - 1529
  • [36] VALIDATION OF PRIAS ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE CRITERIA IN PATIENTS SUBMITTED TO RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Bizzarri, Cosimo
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Passaretti, Giovanni
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Bertaccini, Alessandro
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Manferrari, Fabio
    Concetti, Sergio
    Garofalo, Marco
    Chessa, Francesco
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Provenzale, Michele
    Simona, Rizzi
    Fiorentino, Michelangelo
    Martorana, Giuseppe
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 32 (05) : 1896 - 1897
  • [37] Radical prostatectomy findings in patients considered potential candidates for active surveillance
    Troncoso, P.
    Davis, J. W.
    Ward, J. F.
    Wang, X.
    Babaian, R. J.
    Kim, J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2008, 88 : 185A - 185A
  • [38] Association of transcriptomic biomarkers with adverse pathologic features at radical prostatectomy among active surveillance eligible men.
    Li, Eric
    Proudfoot, James A.
    Kundu, Nalin
    Ho, Austin Y.
    Neill, Clayton
    Davicioni, Elai
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Ross, Ashley
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (4_SUPPL) : 338 - 338
  • [39] Evaluating the Safety of Active Surveillance: Outcomes of Deferred Radical Prostatectomy after an Initial Period of Surveillance
    Balakrishnan, Ashwin S.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 202 (03): : 506 - 510
  • [40] Predictive factors of unfavorable prostate cancer in patients who underwent prostatectomy but eligible for active surveillance
    Choo, Seol Ho
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Choi, Han Yong
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2 (02) : 70 - 75
12345