Adherence of rheumatoid arthritis patients to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a cross-sectional study

被引:0
|
作者
Natalia Mena-Vazquez
Sara Manrique-Arija
Lucía Yunquera-Romero
Inmaculada Ureña-Garnica
Marta Rojas-Gimenez
Carla Domic
Francisco Gabriel Jimenez-Nuñez
Antonio Fernandez-Nebro
机构
[1] UGC de Reumatología,
[2] Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA),undefined
[3] Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga,undefined
[4] Universidad de Málaga,undefined
[5] Hospitalary pharmacy,undefined
[6] Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga,undefined
来源
关键词
Rheumatoid arthritis; Adherence; Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aims of this study were to evaluate adherence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), identify potential risk factors, and analyze the discriminative ability of the Morisky–Green test (MGT) to detect bDMARD nonadherence. One hundred and seventy-eight adult RA patients treated with bDMARDs were included. Adherence was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR) of the previous 6 months. An MPR >80% was considered good adherence. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and MGT scores were assessed through a standardized clinical interview at the cross-sectional date. One-hundred and twelve patients (63%) were taking subcutaneous bDMARDs, while 66 (37%) were taking intravenous drugs. One-hundred fifty-eight (88.8%) showed good adherence to bDMARDs, while 79 (61.2%) also correctly took concomitant conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). In logistic regression models, nonadherence to bDMARDs was associated with higher disease activity [odds ratio (OR) 1.45; 95% CI, 1.03–2.03; p = 0.032] and subcutaneous route (OR 3.70; 95% CI 1.02–13.48; p = 0.040). MGT accurately identified an MPR >80% of bDMARDs in 76.9% of the patients. A sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 70%, positive predictive value of 95.3%, negative predictive value of 28.5%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 2.6, and negative LR of 0.3% were obtained. Adherence may be good for bDMARDs but is low for csDMARDs. Low adherence for bDMARDs is associated with poorer disease control during the past 6 months and use of subcutaneous route. These findings should alert doctors to consider possible low adherence before declaring treatment failure.
引用
收藏
页码:1709 / 1718
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safety and Effectiveness of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Older Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Raquel Freitas
    Fátima Godinho
    Nathalie Madeira
    Bruno Miguel Fernandes
    Flávio Costa
    Mariana Santiago
    Agna Neto
    Soraia Azevedo
    Maura Couto
    Graça Sequeira
    João Madruga Dias
    Miguel Bernardes
    Luís Miranda
    Joaquim Polido Pereira
    João Eurico Fonseca
    Maria José Santos
    Drugs & Aging, 2020, 37 : 899 - 907
  • [22] Safety and Effectiveness of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Older Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Freitas, Raquel
    Godinho, Fatima
    Madeira, Nathalie
    Fernandes, Bruno Miguel
    Costa, Flavio
    Santiago, Mariana
    Neto, Agna
    Azevedo, Soraia
    Couto, Maura
    Sequeira, Graca
    Dias, Joao Madruga
    Bernardes, Miguel
    Miranda, Luis
    Pereira, Joaquim Polido
    Fonseca, Joao Eurico
    Santos, Maria Jose
    DRUGS & AGING, 2020, 37 (12) : 899 - 907
  • [23] Predictors at diagnosis for start of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study
    Hameed, Mohaned
    Exarchou, Sofia
    Eberhard, Anna
    Sharma, Ankita
    Bergstrom, Ulf
    Cagnotto, Giovanni
    Einarsson, Jon Thorkell
    Turesson, Carl
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [24] Comparative Effectiveness of Tofacitinib, Biologic Drugs and Traditional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Machado, Marina
    Moura, Cristiano
    Behlouli, Hassan
    Curtis, Jeffrey
    Bernatsky, Sasha
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 44 (06) : 937 - 938
  • [25] COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF TOFACITINIB, BIOLOGIC DRUGS AND TRADITIONAL DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
    Moura, C. S.
    Machado, M. A.
    Behlouli, H.
    Curtis, J. R.
    Abrahamowicz, M.
    Bernatsky, S.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2017, 76 : 825 - 826
  • [26] Comparative Effectiveness of Tofacitinib, Biologic Drugs and Traditional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Machado, Marina
    Moura, Cristiano S.
    Behlouli, Hassan
    Curtis, Jeffiey R.
    Bernatsky, Sasha
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 68
  • [27] Survival of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Rosales Rosado, Zulema
    Leon, Leticia
    Freites Nunez, Dalifer
    Font Urgelles, Judit
    Leon Cardenas, Cynthia Milagros
    Vadillo Font, Cristina
    Rodriguez Rodriguez, Luis
    Jover Jover, Juan A.
    Abasolo Alcazar, Lydia
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 68
  • [28] Adherence to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in adult patients with rheumatic diseases
    Fazaa, Alia
    Makhlouf, Yasmine
    Ben Ouhiba, Amad
    Miladi, Saoussen
    Sellami, Mariem
    Ouenniche, Kmar
    Souabni, Leila
    Kassab, Salma
    Chekili, Selma
    Zakraoui, Leith
    Ben Abdelghani, Kawther
    Laatar, Ahmed
    THERAPIE, 2021, 76 (05): : 467 - 474
  • [29] Comparative Effectiveness of Nonbiologic versus Biologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis
    DeWitt, Esi Morgan
    Li, Yanhong
    Curtis, Jeffrey R.
    Glick, Henry A.
    Greenberg, Jeffrey D.
    Anstrom, Kevin J.
    Kremer, Joel M.
    Reed, George
    Schulman, Kevin A.
    Reed, Shelby D.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 40 (02) : 127 - 136
  • [30] Evaluation of Response Criteria in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
    Inoue, Mariko
    Kanda, Hiroko
    Tateishi, Shoko
    Fujio, Keishi
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2020, 72 (07) : 942 - 949