The TETAMI Trial: The Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin and of Tirofiban versus Placebo in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction for Patients Not Thrombolyzed: Methods and Design

被引:0
|
作者
Marc Cohen
Frans Maritz
Gian Franco Gensini
Nicolas Danchin
Ari Timerman
Kurt Huber
Enrique P. Gurfinkel
Harvey White
Keith A. A. Fox
Luc Vittori
Veronique Le-Louer
Frederique Bigonzi
机构
[1] Hahnemann University Hospital,
[2] Karl Bremer Hospital,undefined
[3] Clinica Medica Generale e Cardiologia,undefined
[4] Dante Pazzanese,undefined
[5] University of Vienna,undefined
[6] Fundacion Favaloru,undefined
[7] Green Lane Hospital,undefined
[8] The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh,undefined
[9] Aventis Pharma,undefined
来源
关键词
acute myocardial infarction; antithrombotic treatment; enoxaparin; tirofiban;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who do not receive early reperfusion therapy are at high risk of reinfarction or death, and the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy in this group of patients has not been evaluated. Enoxaparin is a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) that has previously been shown to reduce the incidence of ischemic events in patients with unstable angina or non–Q-wave MI. The principal aims of the TETAMI study are to investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with enoxaparin or tirofiban (a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist) alone or in combination for 2 to 8 days in patients with AMI who are not eligible for early reperfusion therapy. In this 2 by 2 factorial design study approximately 900 patients will be randomly assigned, in a blinded manner, to one of four treatments: enoxaparin alone, enoxaparin plus tirofiban, unfractionated heparin (UFH), or UFH plus tirofiban, with appropriate matched placebos. The primary end point is the composite of death, recurrent AMI, and recurrent angina, analyzed at 30 days after AMI. The design and methods of the TETAMI study are described in this article.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 246
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The ESSENCE trial: Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous enoxaparin in unstable angina and non-Q-wave MI: A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study comparing enoxaparin and intravenous unfractionated heparin: Methods and design
    Cohen M.
    Blaber R.
    Demers C.
    Gurfinkel E.P.
    Langer A.
    Fromell G.
    Turpie A.G.G.
    Premmereur J.
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 1997, 4 (2) : 271 - 274
  • [32] Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of unfractionated heparin versus enoxaparin in conjunction with tenecteplase for ST elevation myocardial infarction: Insights from ASSENT 3 and ASSENT 3 PLUS
    Armstrong, PW
    Wallentin, L
    Goldstein, P
    Granger, CB
    Bogaerts, K
    Danays, T
    Van de Werf, F
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (17) : 580 - 581
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in the prehospital setting -: The assessment of the safety and efficacy of a new thrombolytic regimen (ASSENT)-3 PLUS randomized trial in acute myocardial infarction
    Wallentin, L
    Goldstein, P
    Armstrong, PW
    Granger, CB
    Adgey, AAJ
    Arntz, HR
    Bogaerts, K
    Danays, T
    Lindahl, B
    Mäkijärvi, M
    Verheugt, F
    Van de Werf, F
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (02) : 135 - 142
  • [34] Efficacy and safety of bifeprunox versus placebo in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia
    Rapaport, Mark
    Barbato, Luigi M.
    Heisterberg, Jens
    Yeung, Paul P.
    Shapira, Nathan A.
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 31 : S184 - S184
  • [35] Prospective comparison of hemorrhagic complications after treatment with enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for unstable angina pectoris or non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
    Berkowitz, SD
    Stinnett, S
    Cohen, M
    Fromell, GJ
    Bigonzi, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 88 (11): : 1230 - 1234
  • [36] Randomized double-blind safety study of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with tirofiban and aspirin:: The ACUTE II study
    Cohen, M
    Théroux, P
    Borzak, S
    Frey, MJ
    White, HD
    Van Mieghem, W
    Senatore, F
    Lis, J
    Mukherjee, R
    Harris, K
    Bigonzi, F
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 144 (03) : 470 - 477
  • [37] Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Chen, K. Y.
    Rha, S. W.
    Jin, Z.
    Minami, Y.
    Na, J. O.
    Choi, C. U.
    Suh, S. Y.
    Kim, J. W.
    Kim, E. J.
    Park, C. G.
    Seo, H. S.
    Oh, D. J.
    Jeong, M. H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 101 (8B): : 23C - 24C
  • [38] INTRAVENOUS STREPTOKINASE VERSUS HEPARIN IN THE ACUTE STAGE OF MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL IN SOUTHEAST FRANCE
    SAINSOUS, J
    BONNET, JL
    SERRADIMIGNI, A
    HAEMOSTASIS, 1986, 16 : 140 - 147
  • [39] Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin as adjunctive anticoagulant therapy in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-Elevation myocardial infarction
    Nah, D. Y.
    Bae, J. H.
    Lee, K.
    Kim, J. S.
    Kim, K.
    Ha, W. C.
    Kim, Y. K.
    Rhee, M. Y.
    Na, S. H.
    Kim, Y. S.
    Lee, M. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 101 (8B): : 2C - 3C
  • [40] Meta-analysis, of randomized trials comparing enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin as adjunctive therapy to fibrinolysis in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction
    Théroux, P
    Welsh, RC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (07): : 860 - 864