The current status of FLASH particle therapy: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Jake Atkinson
Eva Bezak
Hien Le
Ivan Kempson
机构
[1] University of South Australia,Future Industries Institute
[2] University of South Australia,Cancer Research Institute
[3] University of Adelaide,Department of Physics
[4] Royal Adelaide Hospital,Department of Radiation Oncology
关键词
FLASH radiotherapy; Ultra-high dose rate; Proton therapy; Carbon therapy; Normal tissue sparing; Biological mechanisms; Cancer treatment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Particle therapies are becoming increasingly available clinically due to their beneficial energy deposition profile, sparing healthy tissues. This may be further promoted with ultra-high dose rates, termed FLASH. This review comprehensively summarises current knowledge based on studies relevant to proton- and carbon-FLASH therapy. As electron-FLASH literature presents important radiobiological findings that form the basis of proton and carbon-based FLASH studies, a summary of key electron-FLASH papers is also included. Preclinical data suggest three key mechanisms by which proton and carbon-FLASH are able to reduce normal tissue toxicities compared to conventional dose rates, with equipotent, or enhanced, tumour kill efficacy. However, a degree of caution is needed in clinically translating these findings as: most studies use transmission and do not conform the Bragg peak to tumour volume; mechanistic understanding is still in its infancy; stringent verification of dosimetry is rarely provided; biological assays are prone to limitations which need greater acknowledgement.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 560
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Particle therapy tumour outcomes: An updated systematic review
    Hwang, Eun Ji
    Gorayski, Peter
    Le, Hien
    Hanna, Gerard G.
    Kenny, Liz
    Penniment, Michael
    Buck, Jacqueline
    Thwaites, David
    Ahern, Verity
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 64 (05) : 711 - 724
  • [32] Electroconvulsive therapy for refractory status epilepticus: A systematic review
    Zeiler, F. A.
    Matuszczak, M.
    Teitelbaum, J.
    Gillman, L. M.
    Kazina, C. J.
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2016, 35 : 23 - 32
  • [33] Cell therapy for bone disease: A review of current status
    Cancedda, R
    Bianchi, G
    Derubeis, A
    Quarto, R
    STEM CELLS, 2003, 21 (05) : 610 - 619
  • [34] A review of proton therapy - Current status and future directions
    Mohan, Radhe
    PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 6 (02): : 164 - 176
  • [35] Systematic Review of the Current Status of Human Sarcoma Cell Lines
    Hattori, Emi
    Oyama, Rieko
    Kondo, Tadashi
    CELLS, 2019, 8 (02)
  • [36] Current status of augmented reality in cerebrovascular surgery: a systematic review
    Pedro Aguilar-Salinas
    Salvador F. Gutierrez-Aguirre
    Mauricio J. Avila
    Peter Nakaji
    Neurosurgical Review, 2022, 45 : 1951 - 1964
  • [37] A systematic review: The current status of carbapenem resistance in East Africa
    Ssekatawa K.
    Byarugaba D.K.
    Wampande E.
    Ejobi F.
    BMC Research Notes, 11 (1)
  • [38] Current status of sport performance in Boccia: systematic review of the literature
    Ferreira, Catia C.
    Gamonales, Jose M.
    Espada, Mario C.
    Munoz-Jimenez, Jesus
    RETOS-NUEVAS TENDENCIAS EN EDUCACION FISICA DEPORTE Y RECREACION, 2023, (48): : 1070 - 1077
  • [39] Current status of nanofat in the management of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review
    Jeyaraman, Naveen
    Shrivastava, Sandeep
    Ravi, V. R.
    Nallakumarasamy, Arulkumar
    Jeyaraman, Madhan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2025, 16 (01):
  • [40] Current status and effectiveness of mentorship programmes in urology: a systematic review
    Hay, Daniel
    Khan, Mohammed Shamim
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben
    Peabody, James
    Guru, Khurshid
    Challacombe, Ben
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Ahmed, Kamran
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 (03) : 487 - 494