Increased incidence of pathogenic variants in ATM in the context of testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition

被引:0
|
作者
P. Macquere
S. Orazio
F. Bonnet
N. Jones
V. Bubien
J. Chiron
D. Lafon
E. Barouk-Simonet
J. Tinat
L. Venat-Bouvet
P. Gesta
M. Longy
N. Sevenet
机构
[1] Institut Bergonié,Unité d’oncogénétique
[2] INSERM U1218,Registre des Hémopathies Malignes de la Gironde
[3] Institut Bergonié,undefined
[4] Institut Bergonié,undefined
[5] University of Bordeaux,undefined
[6] Inserm,undefined
[7] Bordeaux Population Health Research Centre,undefined
[8] Epicene team,undefined
[9] UMR 1219,undefined
[10] Consultations d’oncogénétique,undefined
[11] Centre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque,undefined
[12] Consultations d’oncogénétique,undefined
[13] CHU de Bordeaux,undefined
[14] Consultations d’oncogénétique,undefined
[15] CHU de Limoges,undefined
[16] Service d’oncogénétique régional Poitou-Charentes,undefined
[17] CH Niort,undefined
[18] UFR de Pharmacie,undefined
[19] Univ. Bordeaux,undefined
来源
Journal of Human Genetics | 2022年 / 67卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pathogenic Variants (PV) in major cancer predisposition genes are only identified in approximately 10% of patients with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) leads to the characterization of incidental variants in genes other than those known to be associated with HBOC syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine if such incidental PV were specific to a phenotype. The detection rates of HBOC-associated and incidental PV in 1812 patients who underwent genetic testing were compared with rates in control groups FLOSSIES and ExAC. The rates of incidental PV in the PALB2, ATM and CHEK2 genes were significantly increased in the HBOC group compared to controls with, respective odds ratios of 15.2 (95% CI = 5.6–47.6), 9.6 (95% CI = 4.8–19.6) and 2.7 (95% CI = 1.3–5.5). Unsupervised Hierarchical Clustering on Principle Components characterized 3 clusters: by HBOC (P = 0.01); by ExAC and FLOSSIES (P = 0.01 and 0.02 respectively); and by HBOC, ExAC and FLOSSIES (P = 0.01, 0.04 and 0.04 respectively). Interestingly, PALB2 and ATM were grouped in the same statistical cluster defined by the HBOC group, whereas CHEK2 was in a different cluster. We identified co-occurrences of PV in ATM and BRCA genes and confirmed the Manchester Scoring System as a reliable PV predictor tool for BRCA genes but not for ATM or PALB2. This study demonstrates that ATM PV, and to a lesser extent CHEK2 PV, are associated with HBOC syndrome. The co-occurrence of ATM PV with BRCA PV suggests that such ATM variants are not sufficient alone to induce cancer, supporting a multigenism hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 345
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ATM germline variants and male breast cancer
    Cunha, Renato
    Nejo, Priscila
    Bento, Sandra
    Vaz, Fatima
    BMJ CASE REPORTS, 2021, 14 (01)
  • [42] Variants in the ATM gene and breast cancer susceptibility
    Milne, Roger L.
    GENOME MEDICINE, 2009, 1
  • [43] Identification of pathogenic variants in patients with melanoma who meet NCCN criteria for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome testing
    Comeaux, Matthew
    Kidd, John
    Larson, Katie
    Caldwell, Megan
    Coffee, Bradford
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 83 (06) : AB34 - AB34
  • [44] Frequency of pathogenic variants in Fanconi anemia genes in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families
    Stegel, Vida
    Klancar, Gasper
    Anzic, Nina
    Skerl, Petra
    Dragos, Vita Setrajcic
    Bombac, Alenka
    Klasinc, Anja Zagozen
    Vogric, Vesna
    Krajc, Mateja
    Blatnik, Ana
    Strojnik, Ksenja
    Banjac, Marta
    Novakovic, Srdjan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 30 (SUPPL 1) : 394 - 394
  • [45] Ovarian Cancer With Breast Metastasis and Two Pathogenic Variants of BRCA1 Gene
    Kowsarnia, Saeedeh
    Javadi, Nader
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [46] Characterizing the clinical presentation of individuals with pathogenic variants in a breast/ovarian cancer gene panel
    Vaccari, Erica
    Yackowski, Lauren
    Hussong, Melanie
    Murphy, Patricia
    Cremona, Maria L.
    Booker, Jessica
    Hruska, Kathleen
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [47] The Distinct Performances of Ultrasound, Mammograms, and MRI in Detecting Breast Cancer in Patients With Germline Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes
    Liu, Jiaqi
    Wang, Xin
    Dong, Lin
    Huang, Xin
    Zhao, Hengqiang
    Li, Jiaxin
    Huang, Shengkai
    Yuan, Pei
    Wang, Wenyan
    Wang, Jie
    Xing, Zeyu
    Jia, Ziqi
    Ming, Yue
    Li, Xiao
    Qin, Ling
    Liu, Gang
    Wu, Jiang
    Li, Yiqun
    Zhang, Menglu
    Feng, Kexin
    Ying, Jianming
    Wang, Xiang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [48] Breast and ovarian cancer risks associated with cancer predisposition gene mutations identified by multigene panel testing
    Couch, Fergus J.
    Goldgar, David E.
    Hart, Steven N.
    Hallberg, Emily
    Moore, Raymond
    Meeks, Huong
    Huether, Robert
    LaDuca, Holly
    Chao, Elizabeth
    Dolinsky, Jill
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [49] Development of Genetic Testing for Breast, Ovarian and Colorectal Cancer Predisposition: A Step Closer to Targeted Cancer Prevention
    Eccles, D. M.
    CURRENT DRUG TARGETS, 2011, 12 (13) : 1974 - 1982
  • [50] Predictive genetic testing for breast & ovarian cancer predisposition: The role of experiences of cancer in this family & family relationships
    Foster, C
    Watson, M
    Eeles, R
    Houlston, R
    Arden-Jones, A
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2000, 9 (05) : S36 - S36