Cost effective, robust estimation of measurement uncertainty from sampling using unbalanced ANOVA

被引:0
|
作者
Peter D. Rostron
Michael H. Ramsey
机构
[1] University of Sussex,School of Life Sciences
来源
Accreditation and Quality Assurance | 2012年 / 17卷
关键词
Uncertainty; Unbalanced design; Duplicate sample; Robust ANOVA; Accommodating outliers; Optimized uncertainty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is an increasing appreciation that the uncertainty in environmental measurements is vitally important for their reliable interpretation. However, the adoption of methods to estimate this uncertainty has been limited by the extra cost of implementation. One method that can be used to estimate the random components of uncertainty in the sampling and analytical processes requires the collection of duplicate samples at 10% of the primary sampling locations and duplicating the analyses of these samples. A new program has been written and applied to a modified experimental design to enable a 33% reduction in the cost of analysing this 10% subset, whilst accommodating outlying values. This unbalanced robust analysis of variance (U-RANOVA) uses an unbalanced rather than the balanced experimental design usually employed. Simulation techniques have been used to validate the results of the program, by comparison of the results between the proposed unbalanced and the established balanced designs. Comparisons are also made against the seed parameters (mean and standard deviation) used to simulate the parent population, prior to the addition of a proportion (up to 10%) of outlying values. Application to a large number of different simulated populations shows that U-RANOVA produces results that are effectively indistinguishable from the results produced by the accepted balanced approach and are equally close to the true (seed) parameters of the parent normal population.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 14
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measurement uncertainty from sampling and its role in validation of measurement procedures
    Michael H. Ramsey
    Peter D. Rostron
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2024, 29 (2) : 153 - 162
  • [32] Measurement uncertainty from sampling and its role in validation of measurement procedures
    Ramsey, Michael H.
    Rostron, Peter D.
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2024, 29 (02) : 153 - 162
  • [33] Empirical versus modelling approaches to the estimation of measurement uncertainty caused by primary sampling
    Lyn, Jennifer A.
    Ramsey, Michael H.
    Damant, Andrew P.
    Wood, Roger
    ANALYST, 2007, 132 (12) : 1231 - 1237
  • [34] Designing Robust, Cost-Effective Field Measurement Sets using Universal Multiple Linear Regression
    Clutter, Melissa
    Ferre, Ty P. A.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2019, 83 (03) : 531 - 541
  • [35] Estimation of the Measurement Uncertainty of Humidity Using a TDR Probe
    Majerek, Dariusz
    Widomski, Marcin
    Garbacz, Monika
    Suchorab, Zbigniew
    THERMOPHYSICS 2018, 2018, 1988
  • [36] Uncertainty estimation of measurement using a vector network analyzer
    Park, JY
    Park, SK
    Moon, JW
    Park, CB
    2002 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS, COMMUNICATIONS, CONTROL AND POWER ENGINEERING, VOLS I-III, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 1093 - 1096
  • [37] Robust Bayesian cameras motion estimation using random sampling
    Qian, G
    Chellappa, R
    Zheng, QF
    ICIP: 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOLS 1- 5, 2004, : 1361 - 1364
  • [38] Improved evaluation of measurement uncertainty from sampling by inclusion of between-sampler bias using sampling proficiency testing
    Ramsey, Michael H.
    Geelhoed, Bastiaan
    Wood, Roger
    Damant, Andrew P.
    ANALYST, 2011, 136 (07) : 1313 - 1321
  • [40] Cost-effective conservation decisions are robust to uncertainty in the species-area relationship
    Bode, Michael
    Murdoch, William
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (07) : E12 - E12