Noninvasive prenatal screening and maternal malignancy: role of imaging

被引:4
|
作者
Jha P. [1 ]
Lenaerts L. [2 ]
Vermeesch J. [3 ,4 ]
Norton M. [5 ]
Amant F. [2 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Glanc P. [9 ]
Poder L. [10 ]
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, Division of Body Imaging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
[2] Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven
[3] Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven
[4] Centre of Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven
[5] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
[6] Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven
[7] Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
[8] The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam
[9] Department of Radiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
[10] Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
关键词
Cancer in pregnancy; Imaging in pregnancy; NIPS; NIPT; Noninvasive prenatal testing; Postpartum cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-023-03913-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) tests for fetal chromosomal anomalies through maternal blood sampling. It is becoming widely available and standard of care for pregnant women in many countries. It is performed in the first trimester of pregnancy, usually between 9 and 12 weeks. Fragments of fetal cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) floating in maternal plasma are detected and analyzed by this test to assess for chromosomal aberrations. Similarly, maternal tumor-derived cell-free DNA (ctDNA) released from the tumor cells also circulates in the plasma. Hence, the presence of genomic anomalies originating from maternal tumor-derived DNA may be detected on the NIPS-based fetal risk assessment in pregnant patients. Presence of multiple aneuploidies or autosomal monosomies are the most commonly reported NIPS abnormalities detected with occult maternal malignancies. When such results are received, the search for an occult maternal malignancy begins, in which imaging plays a crucial role. The most commonly detected malignancies via NIPS are leukemia, lymphoma, breast and colon cancers. Ultrasound is a reasonable radiation-free modality for imaging during pregnancy, specially when there are localizing symptoms or findings, such as palpable lumps. While there are no consensus guidelines on the imaging evaluation for these patients, when there are no localizing symptoms or clinically palpable findings, whole body MRI is recommended as the radiation-free modality of choice to search for an occult malignancy. Based on clinical symptoms, practice patterns, and available resources, breast ultrasound, chest radiographs, and targeted ultrasound evaluations can also be performed initially or as a follow-up for MRI findings. CT is reserved for exceptional circumstances due to its higher radiation dose. This article intends to increase awareness of this rare but stressful clinical scenario and guide imaging evaluation for occult malignancy detected via NIPS during pregnancy. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.] © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:1590 / 1598
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Compared With Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Pregnancies With Abnormal Maternal Serum Screening
    Sagi-Dain, Lena
    Sheelo, Liat Salzer
    Brabbing-Goldstein, Dana
    Matar, Reut
    Kahana, Sarit
    Agmon-Fishman, Ifaat
    Klein, Cochava
    Gurevitch, Merav
    Basel-Salmon, Lina
    Maya, Idit
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 (05): : 877 - 887
  • [22] Noninvasive Prenatal Screening for Genetic Diseases Using Massively Parallel Sequencing of Maternal Plasma DNA
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    Lo, Y. M. Dennis
    COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN MEDICINE, 2015, 5 (09):
  • [23] Maternal copy-number variations in the DMD gene as secondary findings in noninvasive prenatal screening
    Brison, Nathalie
    Storms, Jazz
    Villela, Darine
    Claeys, Kristl G.
    Dehaspe, Luc
    de Ravel, Thorny
    De Waele, Liesbeth
    Goemans, Nathalie
    Legius, Eric
    Peeters, Hilde
    Van Esch, Hilde
    Race, Valerie
    Vermeesch, Joris Robert
    Devriendt, Koenraad
    Van den Bogaert, Kris
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 21 (12) : 2774 - 2780
  • [24] SCREENING FOR OVARIAN-CANCER - THE ROLE OF NONINVASIVE IMAGING TECHNIQUES
    COHEN, C
    JENNINGS, TS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 170 (04) : 1088 - 1094
  • [25] Navigating Noninvasive Prenatal Screening for Subchromosomal Abnormalities
    Talati, Asha N.
    Hardisty, Emily E.
    Vora, Neeta L.
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2022, 106 (06) : 612 - 613
  • [26] NONINVASIVE PRENATAL SCREENING FOR RHD: THE STOCKHOLM STUDY
    Wikman, T.
    Tiblad, E.
    Westgren, M.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2012, 103 : 33 - 34
  • [27] Benefits and limitations of noninvasive prenatal aneuploidy screening
    Abel, David Eric
    Alagh, Amy
    JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2020, 33 (04): : 49 - 53
  • [28] Maternal sex chromosome aneuploidy identified through noninvasive prenatal screening: clinical profile and patient experience
    Roberts, Aaron W.
    Maisenbacher, Melissa
    Parmar, Sheetal
    Wilkinson, Julia
    Poll, Sarah
    Faulkner, Nicole
    Prakash, Siddharth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S76 - S77
  • [29] Validation of SNP-based noninvasive prenatal screening test to detect maternal X chromosome abnormalities
    Kantor, V.
    Dhamankar, R.
    Valenti, E.
    Lyons, D.
    Trefogli, M. T.
    Balosbalos, I.
    Kao, C.
    Hakonarson, H.
    Martin, K. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 1192 - 1192
  • [30] Noninvasive prenatal diagnostics by maternal plasma DNA sequencing
    Oudejans, Cees B.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2012, 12 (05) : 445 - 447