Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of a multicentre study

被引：0
|
作者：
Alberto Tagliafico
Giovanna Mariscotti
Manuela Durando
Carmen Stevanin
Giulio Tagliafico
Lucia Martino
Bianca Bignotti
Massimo Calabrese
Nehmat Houssami
机构：
[1] University of Genoa,Institute of Anatomy, Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES)
[2] Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino,Radiology University of Torino, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy
[3] Ospedale Regionale di Bolzano,CNR
[4] Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche,IMATI, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
[5] University of Genoa,Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL)
[6] IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST,Department of Breast Radiology
[7] University of Sydney,Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School
来源：
European Radiology | 2015年 / 25卷
关键词：
Breast; Cancer: Mammography; Tomosynthesis; Sensitivity; Microcalcifications;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：9 / 14
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the detection of microcalcifications by correlating mammographic and pathologic findings
    Farghadani, Maryam
    Ghadiri-faraz, Bahar
    Riahinezhad, Maryam
    Sarami, Sahar
    IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA PERSA, 2024, 10 (02):
  • [22] Local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) procedures in Morocco
    Talbi, Mohammed
    El Mansouri, M'hamed
    Nhila, Oussama
    Tahiri, Zakaria
    Eddaoui, Khalida
    Khalis, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2022, 53 (02) : 242 - 247
  • [23] Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
    Nakashima, Kazuaki
    Uematsu, Takayoshi
    Itoh, Takahiro
    Takahashi, Kaoru
    Nishimura, Seiichirou
    Hayashi, Tomomi
    Sugino, Takashi
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (02) : 570 - 577
  • [24] Simplified Computer-Aided Detection Scheme of Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images
    Jeong, Ji-Wook
    Chae, Seung-Hoon
    Chae, Eun Young
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Choi, Young Wook
    Lee, Sooyeul
    2016 38TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2016, : 1070 - 1073
  • [25] Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Detection of Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Jeong, Ji-wook
    Chae, Seung-Hoon
    Chae, Eun Young
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Choi, Young-Wook
    Lee, Sooyeul
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [26] Assessment of local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLS) for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) mammography in Tamil Nadu, India
    Adhimoolam, Saravana Kumar
    Kumar, Sudhir
    Manojkumar, Thangavel
    Devanand, Bala Lakshmoji
    Elango, Nagappan
    Govindarajan, Nagarajarao
    Sapra, Balvinder Kaur
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2024, 200 (19) : 1926 - 1932
  • [27] Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) as a standard mammographic investigation compared with Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) in a District General Hospital Symptomatic Breast Service
    Etheridge, Harriet
    Butler, Aisling
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 18
  • [28] Contrast Detail Phantom Comparison on a Commercially Available Unit. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) versus Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM)
    Bertolini, Marco
    Nitrosi, Andrea
    Borasi, Giovanni
    Botti, Andrea
    Tassoni, Davide
    Sghedoni, Roberto
    Zuccoli, Giulio
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2011, 24 (01) : 58 - 65
  • [29] Contrast Detail Phantom Comparison on a Commercially Available Unit. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) versus Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM)
    Marco Bertolini
    Andrea Nitrosi
    Giovanni Borasi
    Andrea Botti
    Davide Tassoni
    Roberto Sghedoni
    Giulio Zuccoli
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2011, 24 : 58 - 65
  • [30] A four-alternative forced choice (4AFC) methodology for evaluating microcalcification detection in clinical full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems using an inkjet-printed anthropomorphic phantom
    Ikejimba, Lynda C.
    Salad, Jesse
    Graff, Christian G.
    Ghammraoui, Bahaa
    Cheng, Wei-Chung
    Lo, Joseph Y.
    Glick, Stephen J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (09) : 3883 - 3892
12345