Dutch utility weights for the EORTC cancer-specific utility instrument: the Dutch EORTC QLU-C10D

被引:0
|
作者
Femke Jansen
Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw
Eva Gamper
Richard Norman
Bernhard Holzner
Madeleine King
Georg Kemmler
机构
[1] Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Department of Otolaryngology
[2] Amsterdam Public Health,Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam
[3] University Hospital Psychiatry II,Department of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Section Clinical Psychology
[4] Medical University of Innsbruck,Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
[5] Curtin University,School of Public Health
[6] University of Sydney,School of Psychology
[7] University Hospital Psychiatry I,Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
[8] Medical University of Innsbruck,undefined
来源
Quality of Life Research | 2021年 / 30卷
关键词
Cancer; Utility; Quality of life; Discrete choice experiment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:2009 / 2019
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The EORTC QLU-C10D: the Hong Kong valuation study
    Xu, Richard Huan
    Wong, Eliza Lai-yi
    Luo, Nan
    Norman, Richard
    Lehmann, Jens
    Holzner, Bernhard
    King, Madeleine T.
    Kemmler, Georg
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2024, 25 (05): : 889 - 901
  • [32] Comparison of PROPr and EORTC QLU-C10D in breast cancer and fibroadenoma patients
    Klapproth, Christoph Paul
    Fischer, Felix
    Rose, Matthias
    Hage, Anna Maria
    Margarete, Karsten Maria
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S173 - S173
  • [33] Health state utility differed systematically in breast cancer patients between the EORTC QLU-C10D and the PROMIS Preference Score
    Klapproth, Christoph Paul
    Fischer, Felix
    Rose, Matthias
    Karsten, Maria Margarete
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 152 : 101 - 109
  • [34] EORTC QLU-C10D value sets for Austria, Italy, and Poland
    E. M. Gamper
    M. T. King
    R. Norman
    F. Efficace
    F. Cottone
    B. Holzner
    G. Kemmler
    Quality of Life Research, 2020, 29 : 2485 - 2495
  • [35] EORTC QLU-C10D value sets for Austria, Italy, and Poland
    Gamper, E. M.
    King, M. T.
    Norman, R.
    Efficace, F.
    Cottone, F.
    Holzner, B.
    Kemmler, G.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (09) : 2485 - 2495
  • [36] The validity and responsiveness of the EORTC QLU-C10D and HUI-3 in colorectal cancer patients
    Mctaggart-Cowan, Helen
    Teckle, Paulos
    King, Madeleine
    Costa, Daniel
    Chan, Kelvin
    Hoch, Jeffrey S.
    Leighl, Natasha
    Mittmann, Nicole
    Norman, Richard
    Pickard, A. Simon
    Regier, Dean
    Viney, Rosalie
    Peacock, Stuart
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 : S69 - S70
  • [37] The Cancer-Specific Health Economic Measure QLU-C10D is Valid and Responsive for Assessing Health Utility in Patients with Thyroid Cancer
    Pilz, Micha J.
    Seyringer, Simone
    Singer, Susanne
    Ioannidis, Georgios
    Sykiotis, Gerasimos P.
    Arraras, Juan I.
    Husson, Olga
    Iakovou, Ioannis
    Fanetti, Giuseppe
    Fuehrer, Dagmar
    Inhestern, Johanna
    Kiyota, Naomi
    Locati, Laura Deborah
    Pinto, Monica
    Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro
    King, Madeleine T.
    Norman, Richard
    Gamper, Eva M.
    THYROID, 2024, 34 (11) : 1356 - 1370
  • [38] RESPONSIVENESS OF THE EQ-5D-5L AND EORTC QLU-C10D IN CANCER PATIENTS
    Luo, N.
    Gandhi, M.
    Norman, R.
    King, M. T.
    Chay, W. Y.
    Chong, D. Q.
    Farid, M.
    Kanesvaran, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S520 - S521
  • [39] French Value-Set of the QLU-C10D, a Cancer-Specific Utility Measure Derived from the QLQ-C30
    Virginie Nerich
    Eva Maria Gamper
    Richard Norman
    Madeleine King
    Bernhard Holzner
    Rosalie Viney
    Georg Kemmler
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2021, 19 : 191 - 202
  • [40] French Value-Set of the QLU-C10D, a Cancer-Specific Utility Measure Derived from the QLQ-C30
    Nerich, Virginie
    Gamper, Eva Maria
    Norman, Richard
    King, Madeleine
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Viney, Rosalie
    Kemmler, Georg
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2021, 19 (02) : 191 - 202