Effectiveness of Nasal Packing in Trans-septal Suturing Technique in Septoplasty: A Randomized Comparative Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kanak Yadav
Tarun Ojha
Saurabh Gakhar
Abhishek Sharma
Amit Singhal
Vaishali Kataria
机构
[1] Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital,Department of Otorhinolaryngology
关键词
Septoplasty; Nasal packing; Trans-septal suturing technique;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Nasal packing is routinely used after septoplasty, but there are patient factors for which its use needs to be reconsidered. Effectiveness of nasal packing in trans-septal suturing technique in septoplasty. Prospective, comparative study, patients submitted to septoplasty were randomized to receive or not nasal packing postoperatively. Comparison in postoperative status for pain, headache, discomfort in swallowing, epiphora, bleeding, infection and pain on pack removal are assessed. In all the patients trans-septal suturing technique was used. Study group has 60 patients. Two groups were made group A in whom nasal packing done post operatively with merocel, group B in whom nasal packing was not done, in both groups quilting sutures were applied on to the septum. There was pain in nose and headache in all the patients in group A. Other symptoms in group A were epiphora, discomfort in swallowing due to ear discomfort. In addition to these there is pain on removal of packs. Routine use of nasal packing can be avoided instead sutures can be placed over the septum, which benefits in improving pain and symptoms due to pack in the postoperative period.
引用
收藏
页码:1765 / 1769
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison on effectiveness of trans-septal suturing versus nasal packing after septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wei-Wei Wang
    Bao-Cheng Dong
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2017, 274 : 3915 - 3925
  • [12] Comparison on effectiveness of trans-septal suturing versus nasal packing after septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Wei-Wei
    Dong, Bao-Cheng
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 274 (11) : 3915 - 3925
  • [13] A randomised prospective trial of trans-septal suturing using a novel device versus nasal packing for septoplasty
    Korkut, Arzu Y.
    Teker, Aysenur Meric
    Eren, Sabri B.
    Gedikli, Orhan
    Askiner, Omer
    RHINOLOGY, 2010, 48 (02) : 179 - 182
  • [14] Trans-septal suturing technique in septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Certal, Victor
    Silva, Helder
    Santos, Tiago
    Correia, Alexandra
    Carvalho, Carlos
    RHINOLOGY, 2012, 50 (03) : 236 - 245
  • [15] Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: packing versus trans-septal suturing method
    Cukurova, I.
    Cetinkaya, E. A.
    Mercan, G. C.
    Demirhan, E.
    Gumussoy, M.
    ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA, 2012, 32 (02) : 111 - 114
  • [16] Comparative study of nasal septal retainer and nasal packing in patients undergoing septoplasty
    Fang, Shengjian
    Wei, Xian
    Ying, Liyun
    Zhu, Liwei
    Cui, Jiawen
    Ma, Zhaoxin
    Wang, Weihua
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 276 (08) : 2251 - 2257
  • [17] Comparative study of nasal septal retainer and nasal packing in patients undergoing septoplasty
    Shengjian Fang
    Xian Wei
    Liyun Ying
    Liwei Zhu
    Jiawen Cui
    Zhaoxin Ma
    Weihua Wang
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2019, 276 : 2251 - 2257
  • [18] Nasal septal suture technique versus nasal packing after septoplasty
    Yildirim, A
    Yasar, M
    Bebek, AI
    Canbay, E
    Kunt, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06): : 599 - 602
  • [19] A Comparative Study of Septoplasty With or Without Nasal Packing
    Basavaraj N. Walikar
    S. M. Rashinkar
    M. V. Watwe
    Anees Fathima
    Ashfak Kakkeri
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2011, 63 : 247 - 248
  • [20] A Comparative Study of Septoplasty With or Without Nasal Packing
    Walikar, Basavaraj N.
    Rashinkar, S. M.
    Watwe, M. V.
    Fathima, Anees
    Kakkeri, Ashfak
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2011, 63 (03) : 247 - 248