Aortic valve replacement in predominant aortic stenosis: What is an appropriate size valve?

Objective: This is a retrospective analysis of 94 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for predominant aortic stenosis between January 1998 and December 2004. Patients and Methods: Age ranged from 16 to 70 years (mean 43.2±13.2 years).73 were male (77.7%). Etiology was rheumatic in 71 (75.5%) and degenerative in 23 (24.5%) patients. On transthoracic echocardiography, the diameter of the aortic annulus ranged from 19 mm to 36mm (mean 28.5±3.0 mm) and the peak systolic gradients ranged from 54 mm to 174 mm of Hg (mean of 109.8±28.8 mmHg). Aortic regurgitation was absent or mild in 76 patients (80.8%) and moderate in rest. A mechanical valve was implanted in 66 patients (70.2%) and a tissue valve in 28 patients (29.8%). Valves of size 23 mm or more were implanted in 75 patients (80%). A valve of 25 mm or larger was implanted in 55 patients (54.3%). Results: There were no early deaths. Two patients required permanent pacemaker implantation for complete heart block in the immediate postoperative period. Prosthetic valve thrombosis in one patient was relieved by thrombolysis. Anticoagulant related hemorrhage was seen in two patients. One patient underwent homograft aortic valve replacement for prosthetic valve endocarditis nine months after surgery. Conclusion: Isolated aortic valve replacement in patients with predominant aortic stenosis can be performed safely by implanting an adequately large sized prosthesis, without root enlargement in a large majority of patients. © 2007 Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons.