How to conceive of science for the benefit of society: prospects of responsible research and innovation

被引:0
|
作者
Martin Carrier
机构
[1] Bielefeld University,Department of Philosophy, Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Science
来源
Synthese | 2021年 / 198卷
关键词
Social epistemology; Responsibility of science; Science and society;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Responsible research and innovation (RRI) features the dialog of science “with society,” and research performed “for society,” i.e., for the benefit of the people. I focus on this latter, outcome-oriented notion of RRI and discuss two kinds of problems. The first one concerns options to anticipate the future course of science and technology. Such foresight knowledge seems necessary for subjecting research to demands of social and moral responsibility. However, predicting science and technology is widely considered impossible. The second problem concerns moral evaluation. The benefit or harm produced by certain research and innovation achievements is often hard to estimate. Against this background of uncertainty in factual and moral assessment, I explore opportunities left for RRI. First, RRI should contribute to maintaining a wide range of approaches. Second, judgments about RRI should draw on zones of convergence among the variety of research approaches pursued. Third, decisions about implementing a technology should be revisable. Fourth, the more specific inclusion of demands from society should be reserved to technology development. Fifth, in many respects, the social compatibility of a new technology is due rather to the social context than the inherent features of the product. Favorable circumstances are transparency, representation of all relevant parties, and procedural fairness. As a result, some of the benefits and detriments of research and innovation can be identified without detailed knowledge of future findings.
引用
收藏
页码:4749 / 4768
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Achievements and innovation prospects of chemical science
    Aldoshin, S. M.
    HERALD OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2012, 82 (03) : 143 - 157
  • [42] Innovating innovation policy: the emergence of 'Responsible Research and Innovation'
    de Saille, Stevienna
    JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2015, 2 (02) : 152 - 168
  • [43] Responsible Research and Innovation in secondary school science classrooms: experiences from the project Irresistible
    Apotheker, Jan
    Blonder, Ron
    Akaygun, Sevil
    Reis, Pedro
    Kampschulte, Lorenz
    Laherto, Antti
    PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2017, 89 (02) : 211 - 219
  • [44] Responsible research and innovation in information systems
    Stahl, Bernd Carsten
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 21 (03) : 207 - 211
  • [45] Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT - A Framework
    Turk, Ziga
    Sessa, Carlo
    Morales, Stephanie
    Dupont, Anthony
    INTERNET SCIENCE, (INSCI 2016), 2016, 9934 : 239 - 243
  • [46] Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review
    Mirjam Schuijff
    Anne M. Dijkstra
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2020, 26 : 533 - 574
  • [47] The hermeneutic side of responsible research and innovation
    Grunwald, Armin
    JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2014, 1 (03) : 274 - 291
  • [48] Developing Responsible Research and Innovation for Robotics
    McBride, Neil
    Stahl, Bernd
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ETHICS IN SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING, 2014,
  • [49] “Broader Impacts” or “Responsible Research and Innovation”?
    Somsri Wiwanitkit
    Viroj Wiwanitkit
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2014, 20 : 1149 - 1150
  • [50] Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review
    Schuijff, Mirjam
    Dijkstra, Anne M.
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2020, 26 (02) : 533 - 574