Quantitative and semi-quantitative methods in flood hazard/susceptibility mapping: a review

被引:24
|
作者
Mudashiru R.B. [1 ,2 ]
Sabtu N. [1 ]
Abustan I. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Engineering Campus, Nibong Tebal, 14300, Pulau Pinang
[2] Department of Civil Engineering, Federal Polytechnic Offa, Offa
关键词
Climate disaster risk reduction; Flood hazard mapping; Flood susceptibility mapping; Machine learning; Multi-criteria decision-making; Statistical method;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-021-07263-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Flood mitigation and risk management is a very challenging task that requires accurate identification of flood hazard/susceptible regions for adequate planning and management. Accurate determination of locations that are prone to flood hazards needs the application and adaptation of techniques that will provide flood hazard/susceptibility maps with minimal uncertainty. Previous literature reviews on flood hazard analysis have focused on the flood hazard mapping methods such as hydrodynamic, conceptual, and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). Thus, this current study thoroughly reviews studies that applied MCDM, statistical, and machine learning (ML) methods in the identification of flood hazard/susceptible regions. The paper presents information about these methods, their integration in flood studies, strengths, limitations, uncertainty, and recent developments. Conclusively, the paper provided observations and recommendations to enhance the existing information for relevant knowledge in future studies. This will assist stakeholders and key policymakers in making good decisions for flood analysis for a sustainable climate disaster risk reduction management. © 2021, Saudi Society for Geosciences.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Paper-Based Semi-quantitative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
    Wang, Ruisheng
    Erickson, David
    ACS OMEGA, 2021, 6 (02): : 1410 - 1414
  • [12] A review of portable quantitative and semi-quantitative devices for measurement of vitamin A in biological samples
    Huey, Samantha L.
    Krisher, Jesse T.
    Morgan, David
    Mkambula, Penjani
    Gannon, Bryan M.
    Mbuya, Mduduzi N. N.
    Mehta, Saurabh
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 4 : 253 - 274
  • [13] Semi-quantitative mapping of oncological therapies with mass spectrometry imaging
    Baluya, Dodge
    Shrestha, Bindesh
    Cressman, Erik N.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (13)
  • [14] The pathogenesis of endometrial polyps: a systematic semi-quantitative review
    Indraccolo, U.
    Di Iorio, R.
    Matteo, M.
    Corona, G.
    Greco, P.
    Indraccolo, S. R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 34 (01) : 5 - 22
  • [15] Implementing a hospital guideline on pneumonia: a semi-quantitative review
    Cortoos, Pieter-Jan
    Simoens, Steven
    Peetermans, Willy
    Willems, Ludo
    Laekeman, Gert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 19 (06) : 358 - 367
  • [16] Semi-quantitative comparative analysis
    Vatcheva, I
    de Jong, H
    IJCAI-99: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTEENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOLS 1 & 2, 1999, : 1034 - 1040
  • [17] Semi-Quantitative Group Testing
    Emad, Amin
    Milenkovic, Olgica
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY PROCEEDINGS (ISIT), 2012,
  • [18] Survey of semi-quantitative simulation
    Unit 302, Xi'an Institute of Hi-Tech, Xi'an 710025, China
    Xitong Fangzhen Xuebao, 2006, 9 (2375-2380):
  • [19] SEMI-QUANTITATIVE GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
    EASTMAN, RH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1957, 79 (15) : 4243 - 4243
  • [20] Semi-quantitative system identification
    Kay, H
    Rinner, B
    Kuipers, B
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 119 (1-2) : 103 - 140