Quantitative and semi-quantitative methods in flood hazard/susceptibility mapping: a review

被引:24
|
作者
Mudashiru R.B. [1 ,2 ]
Sabtu N. [1 ]
Abustan I. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Engineering Campus, Nibong Tebal, 14300, Pulau Pinang
[2] Department of Civil Engineering, Federal Polytechnic Offa, Offa
关键词
Climate disaster risk reduction; Flood hazard mapping; Flood susceptibility mapping; Machine learning; Multi-criteria decision-making; Statistical method;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-021-07263-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Flood mitigation and risk management is a very challenging task that requires accurate identification of flood hazard/susceptible regions for adequate planning and management. Accurate determination of locations that are prone to flood hazards needs the application and adaptation of techniques that will provide flood hazard/susceptibility maps with minimal uncertainty. Previous literature reviews on flood hazard analysis have focused on the flood hazard mapping methods such as hydrodynamic, conceptual, and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). Thus, this current study thoroughly reviews studies that applied MCDM, statistical, and machine learning (ML) methods in the identification of flood hazard/susceptible regions. The paper presents information about these methods, their integration in flood studies, strengths, limitations, uncertainty, and recent developments. Conclusively, the paper provided observations and recommendations to enhance the existing information for relevant knowledge in future studies. This will assist stakeholders and key policymakers in making good decisions for flood analysis for a sustainable climate disaster risk reduction management. © 2021, Saudi Society for Geosciences.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitative flood hazard assessment methods: A review
    Maranzoni, Andrea
    D'Oria, Marco
    Rizzo, Carmine
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2023, 16 (01):
  • [2] Landslide susceptibility mapping of a hilly region through a semi-quantitative technique
    Swain, Janaki Ballav
    Singh, Ningthoujam James
    Gupta, Lovi Raj
    GEOGRAFISKA ANNALER SERIES A-PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2024,
  • [3] Semi-quantitative or quantitative?
    Epperson, Joe
    Louthan, Jr., McIntyre R.
    Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2005, 5 (03)
  • [4] Flood hazard mapping methods: A review
    Mudashiru, Rofiat Bunmi
    Sabtu, Nuridah
    Abustan, Ismail
    Balogun, Waheed
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 603
  • [5] SEMI-QUANTITATIVE METHODS OF ANALYSIS IN MORPHOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
    KHMELNITSKY, OK
    BYKOV, VL
    ARKHIV PATOLOGII, 1980, 42 (06) : 3 - 9
  • [6] Assessment of quantitative and semi-quantitative biological test methods of artesunate in vitro
    Kouakou, Yobouet Ines
    Omorou, Roukayatou
    Bin Said, Ibrahim
    Lavoignat, Adeline
    Bonnot, Guillaume
    Bienvenu, Anne-Lise
    Picot, Stephane
    PARASITE, 2022, 29
  • [7] Sparse Methods for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping
    Bilgic, Berkin
    Chatnuntawech, Itthi
    Langkammer, Christian
    Setsompop, Kawin
    WAVELETS AND SPARSITY XVI, 2015, 9597
  • [8] Effect of Quantitative and Semi-quantitative Elastography Methods for the Management of Borderline Lesions on Ultrasonography
    Aksoy, Direnc Ozlem
    Yildiz, Seyma
    Atasoy, Bahar
    Alkan, Alpay
    Kandemirli, Sedat Giray
    Cingoz, Mehmet
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2021, 17 (06) : 767 - 774
  • [9] DIAGNOSIS OF VASCULAR CALCIFICATIONS BY SEMI-QUANTITATIVE RADIOLOGICAL METHODS
    Diez, Guillermo Rosa
    Crucelegui, Mar-A Soledad
    Bratti, Griselda Irina
    Diehl, Maria
    Galich, Ana Maria
    ACTUALIZACIONES EN OSTEOLOGIA, 2014, 10 (01) : 82 - 84
  • [10] Towards the semi-quantitative classification of liquefaction susceptibility of the geological units
    Papathanassiou, G.
    Valkaniotis, S.
    Koukousioura, O.
    Papazachos, C.
    EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS, 2019, 4 : 4335 - 4342