Real-time error correction for flood forecasting based on machine learning ensemble method and its uncertainty assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Chengjing Xu
Ping-an Zhong
Feilin Zhu
Luhua Yang
Sen Wang
Yiwen Wang
机构
[1] Hohai University,College of Hydrology and Water Resources
[2] Hohai University,National Engineering Research Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Engineering Safety
关键词
Flood forecasting; Real-time error correction; Machine learning algorithm; Stacking ensemble method; Uncertainty assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Real-time error correction is an effective measure to improve forecast accuracy. This paper develops a real-time error correction model based on machine learning (ML) ensemble method, including the establishment of base learners, heterogeneity test, and Stacking combination. Then the Copula-based Bayesian processor of forecast (BPF) is adopted for probabilistic forecasts, which quantitatively describes the uncertainty of the correction results. Finally, the model performance is comprehensively evaluated from accuracy and stability, with deterministic metrics used to evaluate the correction effect and uncertain metrics for assessing probabilistic forecasts. The proposed model is applied to the multireservoir system in the Huai River Basin, and the results reveal the following: (1) Unlike the single ML algorithm with the performance of oscillations, the Stacking ensemble method can aggregate the advantages of multiple learners, showing robust correction effect and high adaptability across all data samples. (2) The forecasting error is significantly reduced by the Stacking method, with the average Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$NSE$$\end{document}) value increasing above 0.9, which is 4.93% higher than that of the autoregressive (AR) method. The greater superiority is also shown in the remaining evaluation metric values. Moreover, as the lead time increases, the performance of the stacking method tends to have a slower decline trend than the AR method. (3) The changes in the structure of the Stacking method have a relatively small influence on the forecast uncertainty, with all the Containing ratio (CR\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$CR$$\end{document}) values over 80% for different samples. The flexible combination of ML algorithms in the ensemble method will not add additional uncertainty factors and ensure the stability of the correction performance. The framework for real-time error correction and its uncertainty assessment has overall optimal correction performance with less observed data and lower computational cost required, which is promising for further improving the accuracy and reliability of real-time flood forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:1557 / 1577
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Real-time error correction of multiple-hour-ahead flash flood forecasting based on the sliding runoff-rain data and deep learning models
    Zhou, Xingyu
    Huang, Xiaorong
    Jiang, Xue
    Jiang, Jinming
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2025, 655
  • [32] Bayesian Theory Based Self-Adapting Real-Time Correction Model for Flood Forecasting
    Wang, Jun
    Liang, Zhongmin
    Jiang, Xiaolei
    Li, Binquan
    Chen, Li
    WATER, 2016, 8 (03)
  • [33] A new real-time flood forecasting model based on robust kalman filter method
    Zhao, Chao
    Liu, Guangsheng
    Zhu, Mulan
    2018 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY ENGINEERING (IC3E 2018), 2018, 146
  • [34] A real-time flood forecasting system based on GIS and DEM
    García, SG
    REMOTE SENSING AND HYDROLOGY 2000, 2001, (267): : 439 - 445
  • [35] A real-time flood forecasting system based on GIS and DEM
    UTE SEGURA 2000, Plaza Fontes 1, Murcia E-30001, Spain
    IAHS-AISH Publication, 2000, (267): : 439 - 445
  • [36] MACHINE LEARNING METHOD TO PREDICT AND MITIGATE REAL-TIME BLOOD GLUCOSE PREDICTION UNCERTAINTY
    Soule, P.
    De La Brosse, L.
    Calmels, P.
    Camalon, T.
    Rehn, M.
    Caleca, N.
    Bidet, S.
    Place, J.
    Renard, E.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 24 : A115 - A116
  • [37] Flow Updating in Real-Time Flood Forecasting Based on Runoff Correction by a Dynamic System Response Curve
    Bao Weimin
    Si Wei
    Qu Simin
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2014, 19 (04) : 747 - 756
  • [38] A real-time flood forecasting hybrid machine learning hydrological model for Krong H'nang hydropower reservoir
    Nguyen P.S.
    Nguyen T.H.
    Nguyen T.H.
    River, 2024, 3 (01): : 107 - 117
  • [39] A machine learning nowcasting method based on real-time reanalysis data
    Han, Lei
    Sun, Juanzhen
    Zhang, Wei
    Xiu, Yuanyuan
    Feng, Hailei
    Lin, Yinjing
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2017, 122 (07) : 4038 - 4051
  • [40] Real-time error-correction method for photoelectrical theodolite
    Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China
    不详
    Guangxue Jingmi Gongcheng, 2007, 6 (846-851):