Real-time error correction for flood forecasting based on machine learning ensemble method and its uncertainty assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Chengjing Xu
Ping-an Zhong
Feilin Zhu
Luhua Yang
Sen Wang
Yiwen Wang
机构
[1] Hohai University,College of Hydrology and Water Resources
[2] Hohai University,National Engineering Research Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Engineering Safety
关键词
Flood forecasting; Real-time error correction; Machine learning algorithm; Stacking ensemble method; Uncertainty assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Real-time error correction is an effective measure to improve forecast accuracy. This paper develops a real-time error correction model based on machine learning (ML) ensemble method, including the establishment of base learners, heterogeneity test, and Stacking combination. Then the Copula-based Bayesian processor of forecast (BPF) is adopted for probabilistic forecasts, which quantitatively describes the uncertainty of the correction results. Finally, the model performance is comprehensively evaluated from accuracy and stability, with deterministic metrics used to evaluate the correction effect and uncertain metrics for assessing probabilistic forecasts. The proposed model is applied to the multireservoir system in the Huai River Basin, and the results reveal the following: (1) Unlike the single ML algorithm with the performance of oscillations, the Stacking ensemble method can aggregate the advantages of multiple learners, showing robust correction effect and high adaptability across all data samples. (2) The forecasting error is significantly reduced by the Stacking method, with the average Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$NSE$$\end{document}) value increasing above 0.9, which is 4.93% higher than that of the autoregressive (AR) method. The greater superiority is also shown in the remaining evaluation metric values. Moreover, as the lead time increases, the performance of the stacking method tends to have a slower decline trend than the AR method. (3) The changes in the structure of the Stacking method have a relatively small influence on the forecast uncertainty, with all the Containing ratio (CR\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$CR$$\end{document}) values over 80% for different samples. The flexible combination of ML algorithms in the ensemble method will not add additional uncertainty factors and ensure the stability of the correction performance. The framework for real-time error correction and its uncertainty assessment has overall optimal correction performance with less observed data and lower computational cost required, which is promising for further improving the accuracy and reliability of real-time flood forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:1557 / 1577
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Real-time error correction for flood forecasting based on machine learning ensemble method and its uncertainty assessment
    Xu, Chengjing
    Zhong, Ping-an
    Zhu, Feilin
    Yang, Luhua
    Wang, Sen
    Wang, Yiwen
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2023, 37 (04) : 1557 - 1577
  • [2] Advancing real-time error correction of flood forecasting based on the hydrologic similarity theory and machine learning techniques
    Shi, Peng
    Wu, Hongshi
    Qu, Simin
    Yang, Xiaoqiang
    Lin, Ziheng
    Ding, Song
    Si, Wei
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 246
  • [3] Real-time error correction method combined with combination flood forecasting technique for improving the accuracy of flood forecasting
    Chen, Lu
    Zhang, Yongchuan
    Zhou, Jianzhong
    Singh, Vijay P.
    Guo, Shenglian
    Zhang, Junhong
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 521 : 157 - 169
  • [4] A robust real-time flood forecasting method based on error estimation for reservoirs
    Shen, Dandan
    Bao, Weimin
    Ni, Peng
    AQUA-WATER INFRASTRUCTURE ECOSYSTEMS AND SOCIETY, 2022, 71 (04) : 518 - 532
  • [5] Runoff error correction in real-time flood forecasting based on dynamic system response curve
    Si, Wei
    Bao, Weimin
    Qu, Simin
    Si, W. (lindongsisi@163.com), 2013, International Research and Training Center on Erosion and Sedimentation and China Water and Power Press (24): : 497 - 503
  • [6] Sediment yield error correction by dynamic system response curve method in real-time flood forecasting
    Hou, Lu
    Bao, Weimin
    Si, Wei
    Jiang, Peng
    Shi, Peng
    Qu, Simin
    Ye, Fanghong
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2021, 23 (01) : 28 - 46
  • [7] Predictive uncertainty assessment in real time flood forecasting
    Todini, Ezio
    UNCERTAINTIES IN ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING AND CONSEQUENCES FOR POLICY MAKING, 2009, : 205 - 228
  • [8] Role and treatment of uncertainty in real-time flood forecasting
    Todini, E
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2004, 18 (14) : 2743 - 2746
  • [9] Uncertainty Propagation in Ensemble Rainfall Prediction Systems used for Operational Real-Time Flood Forecasting
    Cluckie, I. D.
    Xuan, Y.
    PRACTICAL HYDROINFORMATICS: COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN WATER APPLICATIONS, 2008, 68 : 437 - 447
  • [10] Real-Time Probabilistic Flood Forecasting Using Multiple Machine Learning Methods
    Dinh Ty Nguyen
    Chen, Shien-Tsung
    WATER, 2020, 12 (03)