Exploring the asymmetric effect of fiscal decentralization on economic growth and environmental quality: evidence from India

被引:0
|
作者
Bibhuti Ranjan Mishra
Aviral Kumar Arjun
机构
[1] Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology,Department of Humanities and Social Sciences
[2] Indian Institute of Management,Department of Economics
关键词
Carbon emission; ARDL; NARDL; Fiscal decentralization; India;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, environmental issues have become controversial, and policymakers are discovering new predictors of carbon emissions. Some economists/researchers have advocated for fiscal decentralization to improve the quality of the environment by offering more financial authority to provincial/local and sub-national governments. Therefore, this work aims to inspect the effect of fiscal decentralization on economic growth and environmental quality in India by taking data from 1996 to 2021. This work applies both ARDL and NARDL econometric models for empirical examination. The findings of this study suggest that expenditure decentralization has asymmetric long-term and short-term consequences on economic growth, and carbon emission in India. The result of the asymmetric ARDL model also indicates that positive and negative shock in expenditure decentralization contrarily affects economic growth and carbon emission. Moreover, the positive and negative shock in revenue decentralization helps in reducing carbon emissions both in the long run and short run in India. These outcomes are useful for policy analysis from the Indian economic policy perspective. The study also laid out potential outcomes that may benefit India’s local governments and central government in resolving the issues of economic growth and environmental degradation.
引用
收藏
页码:80192 / 80209
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fiscal Decentralization, Economic Growth, and Haze Pollution Decoupling Effects: A Simple Model and Evidence from China
    Liangliang Liu
    Donghong Ding
    Jun He
    Computational Economics, 2019, 54 : 1423 - 1441
  • [42] Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: Evidence from Spanish Regions (vol 29, pg 24, 2009)
    Perez Gonzalez, Patricio
    Cantarero, David
    PUBLIC BUDGETING AND FINANCE, 2010, 30 (01): : 152 - 152
  • [43] Fiscal decentralization, energy security, economic growth, and tourism nexus: Evidence from big six economies
    Ul-Haq, Jabbar
    Mushtaq, Shahzad
    Visas, Hubert
    Hye, Qazi Muhammad Adnan
    Rehan, Raja
    JOURNAL OF TOURISM MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2023, 10 (02): : 154 - 169
  • [44] Fiscal Decentralization, Economic Growth, and Haze Pollution Decoupling Effects: A Simple Model and Evidence from China
    Liu, Liangliang
    Ding, Donghong
    He, Jun
    COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 54 (04) : 1423 - 1441
  • [45] Degree of Fiscal Decentralization and Flypaper Effect: Evidence from Indonesia
    Siregar, Baldric
    Badrudin, Rudy
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2017, 23 (09) : 9013 - 9019
  • [46] Identifying and disentangling the impact of fiscal decentralization on economic growth
    Canavire-Bacarreza, Gustavo
    Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge
    Yedgenov, Bauyrzhan
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 127
  • [47] China’s Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Economic Growth
    Jian Chu
    Xiao-Ping Zheng
    The Japanese Economic Review, 2013, 64 : 537 - 549
  • [48] Direct and Indirect Effects of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth
    Stojcic, Nebojsa
    Tolic, Meri Suman
    EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2019, 67 (03): : 280 - 306
  • [49] CHINA'S FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH
    Chu, Jian
    Zheng, Xiao-Ping
    JAPANESE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 64 (04) : 537 - 549
  • [50] FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN SELECTED EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
    Slavinskaite, Neringa
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 18 (04) : 745 - 757