The value of monitoring wildlife roadkill

被引:0
|
作者
Amy L. W. Schwartz
Fraser M. Shilling
Sarah E. Perkins
机构
[1] Cardiff School of Biosciences,Road Ecology Center, Department of Environmental Science and Policy
[2] University of California,undefined
来源
关键词
Wildlife-vehicle conflict; Citizen science; Roads; Road ecology; Invasion ecology; Animal behaviour; Sentinel animals;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The number of wildlife-vehicle collisions has an obvious value in estimating the direct effects of roads on wildlife, i.e. mortality due to vehicle collisions. Given the nature of the data—species identification and location—there is, however, much wider ecological knowledge that can be gained by monitoring wildlife roadkill. Here, we review the added value and opportunities provided by these data, through a series of case studies where such data have been instrumental in contributing to the advancement of knowledge in species distributions, population dynamics, and animal behaviour, as well as informing us about health of the species and of the environment. We propose that consistently, systematically, and extensively monitoring roadkill facilitates five critical areas of ecological study: (1) monitoring of roadkill numbers, (2) monitoring of population trends, (3) mapping of native and invasive species distributions, (4) animal behaviour, and (5) monitoring of contaminants and disease. The collection of such data also offers a valuable opportunity for members of the public to be directly involved in scientific data collection and research (citizen science). Through continuing to monitor wildlife roadkill, we can expand our knowledge across a wide range of ecological research areas, as well as facilitating investigations that aim to reduce both the direct and indirect effects of roads on wildlife populations.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preventing wildlife roadkill can offset mitigation investments in short-medium term
    Ascensao, Fernando
    Yogui, Debora R.
    Alves, Mario H.
    Alves, Amanda Carolina
    Abra, Fernanda
    Desbiez, Arnaud L. J.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 253
  • [32] Factors Affecting Wildlife Roadkill in Two Sub-Tropical National Parks in Nepal
    Shrestha, Anusha
    Gautam, Narayan Prasad
    Jha, Rohit Raj
    Raut, Nirjala
    Shrestha, Naresh
    Rai, Ananta
    Khanal, Gopal
    FORMATH, 2024, 23
  • [33] Benefits and challenges of collaborating with volunteers: Examples from National Wildlife Roadkill Reporting Systems in Europe
    Bil, Michal
    Heigl, Florian
    Janoska, Zbynek
    Vercayie, Diemer
    Perkins, Sarah E.
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2020, 54
  • [34] A review of roadkill rescue: who cares for the mental, physical and financial welfare of Australian wildlife carers?
    Englefield, Bruce
    Starling, Melissa
    McGreevy, Paul
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 45 (02) : 103 - 118
  • [35] CCTV for Wildlife Monitoring
    Duarte, Adam
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 (06): : 1126 - 1126
  • [36] MONITORING PESTICIDES IN WILDLIFE
    DUSTMAN, EH
    MARTIN, WE
    HEATH, RG
    REICHEL, WL
    PESTICIDES MONITORING JOURNAL, 1971, 5 (01) : 50 - &
  • [37] Pattern and composition of wildlife roadkill across urban-rural gradient in an African expanding city
    Mariki, Heavenlight L.
    Kessy, Stella T.
    Byamungu, Robert M.
    Rija, Alfan A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 70 (06)
  • [38] Citizen science and smartphones take roadkill monitoring to the next level
    Vercayie, Diemer
    Herremans, Marc
    NATURE CONSERVATION-BULGARIA, 2015, (11): : 29 - 40
  • [39] 'Roadkill'
    Leyland, M
    SIGHT AND SOUND, 2003, 13 (04): : 61 - 61
  • [40] 'Roadkill'
    Frake, P
    CONFRONTATION, 1999, (66-67): : 280 - 280