Landslide susceptibility mapping at Zonouz Plain, Iran using genetic programming and comparison with frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models

被引:1
|
作者
Vahid Nourani
Biswajeet Pradhan
Hamid Ghaffari
Seyed Saber Sharifi
机构
[1] University of Tabriz,Department of Water Resources Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering
[2] University Putra Malaysia,Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering
[3] Islamic Azad University,Department of Water Resources Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering
[4] University of Tabriz,Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture
来源
Natural Hazards | 2014年 / 71卷
关键词
Landslide; GIS; Genetic programming; Remote sensing; Artificial neural network; Zonouz Plain;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Without a doubt, landslide is one of the most disastrous natural hazards and landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) in regional scale are the useful guide to future development planning. Therefore, the importance of generating LSMs through different methods is popular in the international literature. The goal of this study was to evaluate the susceptibility of the occurrence of landslides in Zonouz Plain, located in North-West of Iran. For this purpose, a landslide inventory map was constructed using field survey, air photo/satellite image interpretation, and literature search for historical landslide records. Then, seven landslide-conditioning factors such as lithology, slope, aspect, elevation, land cover, distance to stream, and distance to road were utilized for generation LSMs by various models: frequency ratio (FR), logistic regression (LR), artificial neural network (ANN), and genetic programming (GP) methods in geographic information system (GIS). Finally, total four LSMs were obtained by using these four methods. For verification, the results of LSM analyses were confirmed using the landslide inventory map containing 190 active landslide zones. The validation process showed that the prediction accuracy of LSMs, produced by the FR, LR, ANN, and GP, was 87.57, 89.42, 92.37, and 93.27 %, respectively. The obtained results indicated that the use of GP for generating LSMs provides more accurate prediction in comparison with FR, LR, and ANN. Furthermore; GP model is superior to the ANN model because it can present an explicit formulation instead of weights and biases matrices.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 547
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A GIS-based comparative study of Dempster-Shafer, logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Chen, Wei
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Zhao, Zhou
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 32 (04) : 367 - 385
  • [32] Landslide susceptibility mapping using backpropagation neural networks and logistic regression: The Sephidargole case study, Semnan, Iran
    Khamehchiyan, M.
    Abdolmaleki, P.
    Rakei, B.
    GEOMECHANICS AND GEOENGINEERING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2011, 6 (03): : 237 - 250
  • [33] Landslide Susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches
    Pradhan, B.
    JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 38 (02) : 301 - 320
  • [34] Earthquake induced landslide susceptibility mapping using an integrated ensemble frequency ratio and logistic regression models in West Sumatera Province, Indonesia
    Umar, Zahrul
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Ahmad, Anuar
    Jebur, Mustafa Neamah
    Tehrany, Mahyat Shafapour
    CATENA, 2014, 118 : 124 - 135
  • [35] Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches
    B. Pradhan
    Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2010, 38 : 301 - 320
  • [36] Soil Erosion Susceptibility Mapping with the Application of Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network
    Sarkar T.
    Mishra M.
    Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 2018, 2 (1)
  • [37] Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models for Mapping of Regional-scale Landslide Susceptibility in Volcanic Mountains of West Java']Java (Indonesia)
    Ngadisih
    Bhandary, Netra P.
    Yatabe, Ryuichi
    Dahal, Ranjan K.
    5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EARTHHAZARD AND DISASTER MITIGATION, 2016, 1730
  • [38] A robust discretization method of factor screening for landslide susceptibility mapping using convolution neural network, random forest, and logistic regression models
    Zhao, Zheng
    Chen, Jianhua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2023, 16 (01) : 408 - 429
  • [39] The spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility applying artificial neural network and logistic regression models: A case study of Inje, Korea
    Saro, Lee
    Woo, Jeon Seong
    Kwan-Young, Oh
    Moung-Jin, Lee
    OPEN GEOSCIENCES, 2016, 8 (01): : 117 - 132
  • [40] Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison between Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms
    Viet-Ha Nhu
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Shahabi, Himan
    Singh, Sushant K.
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    Clague, John J.
    Jaafari, Abolfazl
    Chen, Wei
    Miraki, Shaghayegh
    Dou, Jie
    Luu, Chinh
    Gorski, Krzysztof
    Binh Thai Pham
    Huu Duy Nguyen
    Bin Ahmad, Baharin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (08)