A reconstruction of Turkey’s potential natural vegetation using climate indicators

被引:0
|
作者
Nussaïbah B. Raja
Olgu Aydin
İhsan Çiçek
Necla Türkoğlu
机构
[1] GeoZentrum Nordbayern,Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities
[2] University Erlangen-Nürnberg,undefined
[3] Ankara University,undefined
来源
Journal of Forestry Research | 2019年 / 30卷
关键词
Biomes; Multinomial logistic regression; Statistical modelling; Turkey; Vegetation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Turkey, containing three of the world’s biodiversity hotspots, is a hub for genetic biodiversity. However, the vegetation cover has drastically changed in recent decades as a result of substantial transformations in land-use practices. A map of the potential natural vegetation can be used to represent the biodiversity of a country, and therefore a reference to effectively develop conservation strategies. The multinomial logistic regression is used to simulate the probability of different biomes occurring in the country using elevation, climatological data and natural vegetation data. A correlation test was applied to the climatological data to determine which predictors influence vegetation the most. These were temperature, precipitation, relative humidity and cloudiness. The Ordinary Kriging method was employed to transform the data into the format for the multinomial logistic regression model. The model showed that temperature was the most influencing factor with respect to Turkey’s vegetation and distribution follows a similar distribution as the various macroclimates. Broadleaf forests are mostly found in the Black Sea region, which is also the wettest region of the country. The Marmara region is the only other region where there are broadleaf forests. Mixed forests and shrublands are mostly located in Central Anatolia due to the region’s low humidity which favours herbaceous flora. Coniferous forests were dominant in the Aegean and Mediterranean regions, attributed to high temperatures.
引用
收藏
页码:2199 / 2211
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing potential climate change effects on vegetation using a linked model approach
    Halofsky, Jessica E.
    Hemstrom, Miles A.
    Conklin, David R.
    Halofsky, Joshua S.
    Kerns, Becky K.
    Bachelet, Dominique
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2013, 266 : 131 - 143
  • [22] Vegetation zones as indicators of denitrification potential in salt marshes
    Ooi, Sean Khan
    Barry, Aidan
    Lawrence, Beth A.
    Elphick, Chris S.
    Helton, Ashley M.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2022, 32 (06)
  • [23] Shift of potential natural vegetation against global climate change under historical, current and future scenarios
    Ren, Zhengchao
    Zhu, Huazhong
    Shi, Hua
    Liu, Xiaoni
    RANGELAND JOURNAL, 2021, 43 (06): : 309 - 319
  • [25] Precise vegetation restoration in arid regions based on potential natural vegetation and potential normalized difference vegetation index
    Qu, Jia
    Liu, Qi
    Gui, Dongwei
    Feng, Xinlong
    Wang, Haolin
    Zhao, Jianping
    Wang, Guangyan
    Wei, Guanghui
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2024, 32 (02)
  • [26] NPP vulnerability of China's potential vegetation to climate change in the past 50 years
    Yuan Q.
    Wu S.
    Dai E.
    Zhao D.
    Ren P.
    Zhang X.
    Wu, Shaohong (wush@igsnrr.ac.cn), 1600, Science Press (71): : 797 - 806
  • [27] Antarctica's vegetation in a changing climate
    Colesie, Claudia
    Walshaw, Charlotte, V
    Sancho, Leopoldo Garcia
    Davey, Matthew P.
    Gray, Andrew
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [28] Vegetation's responses to climate variability
    Alfredo Huete
    Nature, 2016, 531 : 181 - 182
  • [29] Indicators of vegetation productivity under a changing climate in British Columbia, Canada
    Holmes, Keith R.
    Coops, Nicholas C.
    Nelson, Trisalyn A.
    Fontana, Fabio M. A.
    Wulder, Michael A.
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 56 : 135 - 144
  • [30] Identifying potential indicators of conservation value using natural heritage occurrence data
    Pearman, PB
    Penskar, MR
    Schools, EH
    Enander, HD
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2006, 16 (01) : 186 - 201