Low cathepsin D and low plasminogen activator type 1 inhibitor in tumor cytosols defines a group of node negative breast cancer patients with low risk of recurrence

被引:0
|
作者
Timothy Edward Kute
Jan Grøndahl-Hansen
Si-Ming Shao
Rena Long
Greg Russell
Nils Brünner
机构
[1] Bowman Gray School of Medicine,Department of Pathology
[2] Rigshospitalet,Finsen Laboratory
[3] Bowman Gray School of Medicine,Department of Public Health Sciences Section on Biostatistics
来源
关键词
prognostic markers; proteases; protease inhibitors; node negative;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prognostic factors are highly needed to divide node negative breast cancer patients into groups of low versus high risk of recurrence and death. In order to invade and spread, cancer cells must degrade extracellular matrix proteins. Accordingly, tumor levels of molecules involved in this degradation might be associated with patient outcome. Previous work has demonstrated that high levels of the aspartyl protease cathepsin D in breast cancer are associated with a poor prognosis and similar findings have been reported for molecules involved in the urokinase pathway of plasminogen activation. Interactions between different protease systems have been described and data suggest that several proteolytic enzymes may be operable at the same time in a tumor. In the present study we measured cathepsin D (n=162), uPA (n=116), uPAR (n=109) and PAI-1 (n=135) in tumor cytosols obtained from a population of node negative breast cancer patients. A significant correlation was found between levels of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1. Levels of cathepsin D were directly related to levels of uPA and uPAR. With a median observation time of 4.81 years, univariate survival analyses showed that high levels of uPA and cathepsin D significantly predicted a shorter disease free survival, while only high levels of cathepsin D were able to significantly predict a shorter overall survival. Tumor levels of uPAR and PAI-1 gave mixed results depending on the cut-off point choosen. Interestingly, multivariate analysis demonstrated that PAI-1 and cathepsin D were independent significant prognostic indicators for disease-free survival while only cathepsin D was helpful in overall survival. The five year relapse rate of patients with low PAI-1 and low cathepsin D was 13% while patients who had greater than the median value for both of these molecules had a 5 year relapse rate of 40%. These data would indicate that at least two different protease systems are active in spread of node negative breast cancer and that measurement of these molecules may aid in the decisions to be made when offering adjuvant treatment to these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low Risk of Development of a Regional Recurrence After an Unsuccessful Repeat Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence
    Ingrid G. M. Poodt
    Coco J. E. F. Walstra
    Guusje Vugts
    Adriana J. G. Maaskant-Braat
    Adri C. Voogd
    Robert-Jan Schipper
    Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 26 : 2417 - 2427
  • [22] Aberrant expression of cyclin E in low-risk node negative breast cancer
    Ahlin, Cecilia
    Gruhne, Bettina
    Holmqvist, Marit
    Zetterberg, Anders
    Fjaellskog, Marie-Louise
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2008, 47 (08) : 1539 - 1545
  • [23] Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 is the most significant of the usual tissue prognostic factors in node-negative breast ductal adenocarcinoma independent of urokinase-type plasminogen activator
    Descotes, Francoise
    Riche, Benjamin
    Saez, Simone
    De Laroche, Guy
    Datchary, Jean
    Roy, Pascal
    Andre, Jean
    Bobin, Jean Yves
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2008, 8 (02) : 168 - 177
  • [24] Tumor marker utility and prognostic relevance of cathepsin B, cathepsin L, urokinase-type plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1, CEA and CA 19-9 in colorectal cancer
    László Herszényi
    Fabio Farinati
    Romilda Cardin
    Gábor István
    László D Molnár
    István Hritz
    Massimo De Paoli
    Mario Plebani
    Zsolt Tulassay
    BMC Cancer, 8
  • [25] Tumor marker utility and prognostic relevance of cathepsin B, cathepsin L, urokinase-type plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1, CEA and CA 19-9 in colorectal cancer
    Herszenyi, Laszlo
    Farinati, Fabio
    Cardin, Romilda
    Istvan, Gabor
    Molnar, Laszlo D.
    Hritz, Istvan
    De Paoli, Massimo
    Plebani, Mario
    Tulassay, Zsolt
    BMC CANCER, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [26] Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor PAI-1 for tumor-biological risk assessment in node-negative breast cancer patients - The multicenter trial NNBC 3-Europe
    Thomssen, C.
    Vetter, M.
    Paepke, D.
    Schmidt, M.
    Veyret, C.
    Augustin, D.
    Hanf, V.
    Martin, P.
    von Minckwitz, G.
    Harbeck, N.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 6 (07): : 188 - 189
  • [27] PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATORS AND THEIR INHIBITORS IN NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER - LOW CONTENT OF TYPE-2 PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR INHIBITOR ASSOCIATED WITH TUMOR DISSEMINATION
    NAGAYAMA, M
    SATO, A
    HAYAKAWA, H
    URANO, T
    TAKADA, Y
    TAKADA, A
    CANCER, 1994, 73 (05) : 1398 - 1405
  • [28] Cathepsin-D, urokinase plasminogen activator and type-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor in early breast cancer: an immunohistochemical study of prognostic value and relations to tenascin-C and other factors
    T Jahkola
    T Toivonen
    K von Smitten
    I Virtanen
    V-M Wasenius
    C Blomqvist
    British Journal of Cancer, 1999, 80 : 167 - 174
  • [29] Cathepsin-D, urokinase plasminogen activator and type-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor in early breast cancer: an immunohistochemical study of prognostic value and relations to tenascin-C and other factors
    Jahkola, T
    Toivonen, T
    von Smitten, K
    Virtanen, I
    Wasenius, VM
    Blomqvist, C
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 80 (1-2) : 167 - 174
  • [30] Independent prognostic value of angiogenesis and the level of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 in breast cancer patients
    S Hansen
    J Overgaard
    C Rose
    Ann Knoop
    A-V Lænkholm
    J Andersen
    F B Sørensen
    P A Andreasen
    British Journal of Cancer, 2003, 88 : 102 - 108