Prognostic factors in patients treated with stereotactic image-guided robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a single-center retrospective analysis of 223 patients

被引:0
|
作者
Antonio Pontoriero
Alfredo Conti
Giuseppe Iatì
Stefania Mondello
Dario Aiello
Carmen Rifatto
Edoarda Risoleti
Micol Mazzei
Francesco Tomasello
Stefano Pergolizzi
Costantino De Renzis
机构
[1] University of Messina,Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images
[2] University of Messina,Department of Neuroscience Messina
[3] A.O.U. “G. Martino”,Operative Unit of Radiation Oncology
[4] Messina University,School of Medicine
来源
Neurosurgical Review | 2016年 / 39卷
关键词
Brain metastases; Cyberknife; Radiosurgery; Prognostic factors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this retrospective study, we evaluated the overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) of brain metastases (BM) in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The scope was to identify host, tumor, and treatment factors predictive of LC and survival and define implications for clinical decisions. A total of 223 patients with 360 BM from various histologies treated with SRS alone or associated with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in our institution between July 1, 2008 and August 31, 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Among other prognostic factors, we had also evaluated retrospectively Karnofsky performance status scores (KPS) and graded prognostic assessment (GPA). Overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were the primary endpoints. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate OS and LC and identify factors predictive of survival and local control. The median duration of follow-up time was 9 months (range 0.4–51 months). Median overall survival of all patients was 11 months. The median local control was 38 months. No statistical difference in terms of survival or LC between patients treated with SRS alone or associated with WBRT was found. On multivariate analysis, KPS was the only statistically significant predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.53, p = 0.006). On univariate analysis, KPS and GPA were significantly prognostic for survival. None of the host, tumor, or treatment factors analyzed in the univariate model factors were significantly associated with local failure.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 504
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tumor control and survival in patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: a retrospective analysis
    Matthew I. Ehrlich
    Elliot Schiff
    Jonathan P. S. Knisely
    Jenghwa Chang
    Xin Qian
    Anuj Goenka
    Michael Schulder
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2019, 143 : 167 - 174
  • [32] Clinical outcomes of image-guided percutaneous drainage of pericardial effusion in cancer patients: A single-center retrospective analysis
    Hasegawa, Tetsuya
    Arai, Yasuaki
    Sone, Miyuki
    Sugawara, Shunsuke
    Itou, Chihiro
    Wada, Shinji
    Umakoshi, Noriyuki
    Kubo, Takatoshi
    Kimura, Shintaro
    Kusumoto, Masahiko
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 19 (01) : 257 - 262
  • [33] Single fraction image-guided robotic stereotactic radiosurgery for primary and secondary lung cancer
    Senger, C.
    Pasemann, D.
    Kluge, A.
    Acker, G.
    Kalinauskaite, G.
    Kreimeier, A.
    Budach, V
    Stromberger, C.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 : S140 - S140
  • [34] Safety and feasibility of image-guided robotic radiosurgery for patients with limited bone metastases of prostate cancer
    Muacevic, Alexander
    Kufeld, Markus
    Rist, Carsten
    Wowra, Berndt
    Stief, Christian
    Staehler, Michael
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (04) : 455 - 460
  • [35] Stereotactic Radiosurgery to the Resection Cavity in Patients with Brain Metastases: Patterns of Failure and Prognostic Factors
    Yilmaz, Ugur
    Yaprak, Gokhan
    Aydogmus, Evren
    Isik, Naciye
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 38 (01): : 9 - 14
  • [36] Sociodemographic predictors of patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery
    Alphonse-Sullivan, Natalie
    Taksler, Glen B.
    Lycan, Thomas
    Weaver, Kathryn E.
    McTyre, Emory R.
    Shenker, Rachel F.
    Page, Brandi R.
    Isom, Scott
    Johnson, Adam
    Munley, Michael T.
    Laxton, Adrian W.
    Tatter, Stephen B.
    Watabe, Kounosuke
    Chan, Michael D.
    Ruiz, Jimmy
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (60) : 101005 - 101011
  • [37] Hippocampus Dosimetry in patients treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases
    Iqbal, N. S.
    Powell, J. R.
    Tilsley, D. W. O.
    Bryant, A.
    Millin, A. E.
    Lewis, D.
    Staffurth, J. N.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S616 - S617
  • [38] Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for patients with 16 or more brain metastases: Retrospective single-institution analysis
    Milano, Michael T.
    Hardy, Sara
    Zhang, Dandan
    Igwe, Terris
    Huang, Daniel
    Chowdhry, Amit K.
    Yoon, Jihyung
    Schmidt, Tyler M.
    Walter, Kevin A.
    Jung, Hyunuk
    Zhou, Yuwei
    Usuki, Kenneth Y.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY-X, 2025, 26
  • [39] FRACTIONATED STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY IN BRAIN METASTASES: A SINGLE INSTITUTE RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS
    Pareek, Vibhay
    VanUytven, Eric
    Venkataraman, Sankar
    Butler, James
    Kakumanu, Saranya
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 198 : S10 - S10
  • [40] Image-Guided Robotic Radiosurgery for Treatment of Recurrent Grade II and III Meningiomas. A Single-Center Study
    Acker, Gueliz
    Meinert, Franziska
    Conti, Alfredo
    Kufeld, Markus
    Jelgersma, Claudius
    Nguyen, Phuong
    Kluge, Anne
    Lukas, Mathias
    Loebel, Franziska
    Pasemann, Diana
    Kaul, David
    Budach, Volker
    Vajkoczy, Peter
    Senger, Carolin
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 131 : E96 - E107