Reliability Based Pseudo-Dynamic Analysis of Gravity Retaining Walls

被引:4
|
作者
Guha Ray A. [1 ]
Baidya D.K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Civil Engineering Department, BITS-Pilani Hyderabad, Secunderabad
[2] Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal
关键词
Gravity retaining wall; Limit equilibrium; Pseudo-dynamic method; Risk factors; Uncertainty analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s40098-017-0271-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pseudo-dynamic method of analysis, considering the effect of earthquake loading, shear and primary waves, results in more realistic values of earth pressures than the commonly used pseudo-static method. To account for the uncertainties of geotechnical parameters, conventionally, either a global Factor of Safety (FS) to the entire structure or a constant partial FS to a particular geotechnical variable is applied. The present paper aims at quantifying these uncertainties and proposes partial risk factors based upon the variations of geotechnical random variables. For this purpose, a gravity retaining wall is analyzed by pseudo-dynamic method of analysis against sliding and overturning modes of failure. The backfill and foundation soil properties are treated as random variables and the effect of their variation on stability of the wall for various earthquake conditions is investigated. Probability of Failure (Pf) for the two modes is calculated by Monte Carlo Simulation. Sensitivity analysis of each random variable is carried out by F-Test analysis to analyze the impact of the random variables on the failure modes. Finally, these two are combined mathematically to produce a modification factor called the Probabilistic Risk Factor (Rf) for each random variable. It is observed that apart from the seismic horizontal and vertical pseudo-dynamic coefficients Qh(t) and Qv(t), the variation in friction angle of backfill soil (φ1) and cohesion of foundation soil (c2)are the major influential geotechnical parameters in stability of the gravity retaining wall. If the variation of internal angle of friction of backfill and foundation soil exceeds approximately 7–8%, the structure needs to be modified for stability requirements. Similarly, the dimension of the structure needs to be increased if COV of c2 exceeds 20% to maintain stability. Parametric studies are carried out for different combinations of vertical and horizontal seismic acceleration coefficients, and risk factor based approach is applied in each case. © 2017, Indian Geotechnical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 584
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pseudo-dynamic testing of a concrete gravity dam
    Aldemir, Alper
    Binici, Baris
    Arici, Yalin
    Kurc, Ozgur
    Canbay, Erdem
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2015, 44 (11): : 1747 - 1763
  • [22] Pseudo-dynamic analysis of retaining wall sliding stability under seismic action
    Xia, Tangdai, 1600, Central South University of Technology (45):
  • [23] Reliability Coupled Sensitivity Based Design Approach for Gravity Retaining Walls
    Guha Ray A.
    Baidya D.K.
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2012, 93 (3) : 193 - 201
  • [24] Seismic reliability assessment of external stability of reinforced soil walls using pseudo-dynamic method
    Basha, B. M.
    Babu, G. L. S.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 16 (03) : 197 - 215
  • [25] Seismic reliability assessment of internal stability of reinforced soil walls using the pseudo-dynamic method
    Basha, B. M.
    Babu, G. L. S.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 18 (05) : 221 - 241
  • [26] Pseudo-dynamic analysis for seismic active earth pressure behind rigid retaining wall
    Wang, Zhi-Kai
    Xia, Tang-Dai
    Chen, Wei-Yun
    Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2012, 46 (01): : 46 - 51
  • [27] Seismic active earth pressure behind a nonvertical retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis
    Ghosh, Priyanka
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 45 (01) : 117 - 123
  • [28] Seismic Active Earth Pressure for Inclined Rigid Retaining Walls Considering Rotation of the Principal Stresses with Pseudo-Dynamic Method
    Zhou, Yitao
    Chen, Fuquan
    Wang, Xuemin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2018, 18 (07)
  • [29] Reliability Analysis of Counterfort Retaining Walls
    Mandali, Anil Kumar
    Sujith, M. S.
    Rao, B. N.
    Maganti, Janardhana
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 11 (01): : 42 - 56
  • [30] Comparison of Pseudo-Static and Pseudo-Dynamic Methods for Seismic Earth Pressure on Retaining Wall
    Choudhury, Deepankar
    Nimbalkar, Sanjay S.
    Mandal, J. N.
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 2006, 10 (04): : 263 - 271