Bank Capital Regulation: Theory, Empirics, and Policy

被引:0
|
作者
Shekhar Aiyar
Charles W Calomiris
Tomasz Wieladek
机构
来源
IMF Economic Review | 2015年 / 63卷
关键词
G21; G18; E51; E52; E44;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Minimum equity ratio requirements promote bank stability, but compliance must be measured credibly and requirements must be commensurate with risk. A mix of higher book equity requirements, a carefully designed contingent capital requirement, cash reserve requirements, and other measures, would address prudential objectives better than book equity requirements alone. Basel III’s ill-defined liquidity ratios, book capital ratios, and internal models of risk must be replaced by a system of credible, incentive-robust rules that combine valid concepts with objective, market-based information into a simplified and credible regulatory process. Raising minimum capital requirements will not be socially costless; bank profitability, share prices, and loan supply are likely to suffer. But avoiding the dramatic consequences of banking crises would more than repay those costs.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 983
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条