Subsidy Incidence in the Presence of Bertrand Suppliers of Complementary Inputs: A U.S. Agricultural Example

被引:0
|
作者
Abby Kelly
Kalyn T. Coatney
Xiaofei Li
Keith H. Coble
机构
[1] Mississippi State University,Department of Agricultural Economics
[2] Mississippi State University,Department of Agricultural Economics
[3] Mississippi State University,Department of Agricultural Economics
关键词
Subsidies; Bertrand competition; Differentiated products; Farm policy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Past farm subsidy research has identified the occurance of subsidy incidence to only a single input factor market (land). We expand subsidy incidence literature to a partial equilibrium two-stage dynamic game between a price-taking buyer and two Bertrand complementary input suppliers. The buyer (farmer) is the target of the government subsidy. We find that a coupled subsidy results in higher input prices for both the affiliated coupled factor (land) and its nonaffiliated complementary factor (e.g. seed). Sector welfare and welfare distribution are highly influenced by input demand complementarity. Surplus for the receiver of the coupled subsidy increases as inputs become closer complements,while aggregate surplus distribution increasingly favors the input suppliers. However, increases in sector growth from coupled subsidies (mulitplier effect) increases as inputs become closer complements. Therefore, policy aimed at mitigating subsidy incidence may reduce sector growth.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 501
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Determinants of the incidence of U.S. Mortgage Loan Modifications
    Been, Vicki
    Weselcouch, Mary
    Voicu, Ioan
    Murff, Scott
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (10) : 3951 - 3973
  • [22] Time for Japan to Review the U.S. Troop Presence
    Hiromichi, Umebayashi
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL-JAPAN FOCUS, 2005, 3 (10):
  • [23] Ems Dettikon aims for a bigger U.S. presence
    Cage, Sam
    Chemical Week, 2002, 164 (46)
  • [24] Conflicting and Complementary Elements in China and U.S.'s Policy towards Africa
    Lin Lin
    Qiao shi
    Contemporary International Relations, 2013, (04) : 108 - 122
  • [25] Potential Soil C Sequestration on U.S. Agricultural Soils
    M. Sperow
    M. Eve
    K. Paustian
    Climatic Change, 2003, 57 : 319 - 339
  • [26] Mitigating Structural Inequities in U.S. Agricultural Risk Management
    Hagerman, Amy D.
    Schaefer, K. Aleks
    Van Leuven, Andrew J.
    Tsiboe, Francis
    Young, Alicia M.
    Zereyesus, Yacob Abrehe
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2025,
  • [27] The Intended and Unintended Effects of U.S. Agricultural and Biotechnology Policies
    Naseem, Anwar
    Nagarajan, Latha
    AGRIBUSINESS, 2013, 29 (02) : 256 - 258
  • [28] Reality education: Agricultural knowledge exchange in the U.S. South
    Franzen, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SYSTEMS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 7 (02) : 69 - 83
  • [29] China's presence in Mexican manufacturing exports to the U.S. and Canada
    Morales-Lopez, Rodrigo
    PROBLEMAS DEL DESARROLLO, 2022, 53 (210): : 65 - 96
  • [30] Public inputs and dynamic producer behavior: endogenous growth in U.S. agriculture
    Alejandro Onofri
    Lilyan E. Fulginiti
    Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2008, 30 : 13 - 28