Matching Methods for Obtaining Survival Functions to Estimate the Effect of a Time-Dependent Treatment

被引:19
|
作者
Li Y. [1 ]
Schaubel D.E. [1 ]
He K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Causal inference; Matching; Observational study; Propensity score; Survival function; Time-dependent treatment;
D O I
10.1007/s12561-013-9085-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In observational studies of survival time featuring a binary time-dependent treatment, the hazard ratio (an instantaneous measure) is often used to represent the treatment effect. However, investigators are often more interested in the difference in survival functions. We propose semiparametric methods to estimate the causal effect of treatment among the treated with respect to survival probability. The objective is to compare post-treatment survival with the survival function that would have been observed in the absence of treatment. For each patient, we compute a prognostic score (based on the pre-treatment death hazard) and a propensity score (based on the treatment hazard). Each treated patient is then matched with an alive, uncensored and not-yet-treated patient with similar prognostic and/or propensity scores. The experience of each treated and matched patient is weighted using a variant of Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighting to account for the impact of censoring. We propose estimators of the treatment-specific survival functions (and their difference), computed through weighted Nelson-Aalen estimators. Closed-form variance estimators are proposed which take into consideration the potential replication of subjects across matched sets. The proposed methods are evaluated through simulation, then applied to estimate the effect of kidney transplantation on survival among end-stage renal disease patients using data from a national organ failure registry. © 2013 International Chinese Statistical Association.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 126
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Examining evidence of time-dependent treatment effects: an illustration using regression methods
    Kim M. Jachno
    Stephane Heritier
    Robyn L. Woods
    Suzanne Mahady
    Andrew Chan
    Andrew Tonkin
    Anne Murray
    John J. McNeil
    Rory Wolfe
    Trials, 23
  • [42] Visualization methods for time-dependent data -: An overview
    Müller, W
    Schumann, H
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 737 - 745
  • [43] Time-dependent quantum methods for large systems
    Makri, N
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 50 : 167 - 191
  • [44] METHODS FOR TIME-DEPENDENT RELIABILITY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
    MADSEN, HO
    TVEDT, L
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1990, 116 (10): : 2118 - 2135
  • [45] Reduced basis methods for time-dependent problems
    Hesthaven, Jan S.
    Pagliantini, Cecilia
    Rozza, Gianluigi
    ACTA NUMERICA, 2022, 31 : 265 - 345
  • [46] TREATMENT OF PAIRING IN A TIME-DEPENDENT THEORY
    PAL, MK
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1980, 349 (3-4) : 433 - 444
  • [47] Time-Dependent Treatment of Molecular Processes
    Oehrn, Yngve
    ADVANCES IN QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, VOL 70, 2015, 70 : 69 - 109
  • [48] Jet methods in time-dependent Lagrangian biomechanics
    Ivancevic, Tijana T.
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2010, 8 (05): : 737 - 745
  • [49] GENERALIZED PERTURBATION METHODS IN TIME-DEPENDENT PROBLEMS
    GANDINI, A
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1976, 59 (01) : 60 - 63
  • [50] Time-dependent quantum methods for large systems
    Annu Rev Phys Chem, (167-191):