The benefits of cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation are increased in Osteoporotic bone: A finite element analysis

被引:21
|
作者
Wang W. [1 ]
Baran G.R. [1 ]
Garg H. [2 ]
Betz R.R. [3 ]
Moumene M. [4 ]
Cahill P.J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19104
[2] Artemis Health Institute, Gurgaon 122001, Haryana
[3] Shriners Hospitals for Children-Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19140
[4] DePuy Synthes Spine, Inc., Raynham, MA 02767
关键词
Cement; Finite element analysis; Osteoporosis; Pedicle screw; PMMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jspd.2014.03.002
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design Biomechanical study using a finite element model of a normal and osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae comparing resistance with axial pullout and bending forces on polymethylmethacrylate-augmented and non-augmented pedicle screws. Objective To compare the effect of cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation in normal and osteoporotic bone with 2 different techniques of cement delivery. Summary of Background Data Various clinical and biomechanical studies have addressed the benefits of cement augmentation of pedicle screws, but none have evaluated whether this effect is similar, magnified, or attenuated in osteoporotic bone compared with normal bone. In addition, no study has compared the biomechanical strength of augmented pedicle screws using cement delivery through the pedicle screw with delivery through a pilot hole. Methods This study was funded by a grant from DePuy Synthes Spine. Normal and osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae with pedicle screws were simulated. The models were tested for screw pullout strength with and without cement augmentation. Two methods of cement delivery were also tested. Both methods were tested using 1 and 2.5 cm 3 volume of cement infiltrated in normal and osteoporotic bone. Results The increase in screw pullout force was proportionally greater in osteoporotic bone with equivalent volumes of cement delivered. The researchers found that 1 and 2.5 cm3 of cement infiltrated bone volume resulted in an increase in pullout force by about 50% and 120% in normal bone, and by about 64% and 156% in osteoporotic bone, respectively. The delivery method had only a minimal effect on pullout force when 2.5 cm3 of cement was injected (<4% difference). Conclusions Cement augmentation increases the fixation strength of pedicle screws, and this effect is proportionately greater in osteoporotic bone. Cement delivery through fenestrated screws and delivery through a pilot hole result in comparable pullout strength at higher cement volumes. © 2014 Scoliosis Research Society.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 259
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Bicortical Pedicle Screw in the Cephalad Trajectory Is the Best Option for the Fixation of an Osteoporotic Vertebra: A Finite Element Study
    Murata, Akimasa
    Tsutsui, Shunji
    Yamamoto, Ei
    Kozaki, Takuhei
    Nakanishi, Ryuichiro
    Yamada, Hiroshi
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 8 (05): : 510 - 517
  • [22] Biomechanical study of expandable pedicle screw fixation in severe osteoporotic bone comparing with conventional and cement-augmented pedicle screws
    Chen, Yi-Long
    Chen, Wen-Chuan
    Chou, Chi-Wei
    Chen, Jou-Wen
    Chang, Chia-Ming
    Lai, Yu-Shu
    Cheng, Cheng-Kung
    Wang, Shih-Tien
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2014, 36 (11) : 1416 - 1420
  • [23] Finite-element analysis of injectable calcium sulfate bone cement augmentation with dynamic hip screw system for the treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures
    Yu, Xiao-Wei
    Wang, Nan
    Tang, Ting-Ting
    Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2009, 43 (11): : 1813 - 1817
  • [24] Cement Augmentation of Pedicle Screw Fixation Using Novel Cannulated Cement Insertion Device
    Waits, Chad
    Burton, Douglas
    McIff, Terence
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (14) : E478 - E483
  • [25] Comparison of pedicle screw fixation with or without cement augmentation for treating single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis in the osteoporotic spine
    Jian-cheng Peng
    Hui-zhi Guo
    Chen-guang Zhan
    Hua-sheng Huang
    Yan-huai Ma
    Shun-cong Zhang
    Yue-rong Xu
    Guo-ye Mo
    Yong-chao Tang
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [26] Comparison of pedicle screw fixation with or without cement augmentation for treating single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis in the osteoporotic spine
    Peng, Jian-cheng
    Guo, Hui-zhi
    Zhan, Chen-guang
    Huang, Hua-sheng
    Ma, Yan-huai
    Zhang, Shun-cong
    Xu, Yue-rong
    Mo, Guo-ye
    Tang, Yong-chao
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [27] Time to augment?! Impact of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fixation strength depending on bone mineral density
    Weiser, Lukas
    Huber, Gerd
    Sellenschloh, Kay
    Viezens, Lennart
    Pueschel, Klaus
    Morlock, Michael M.
    Lehmann, Wolfgang
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (08) : 1964 - 1971
  • [28] Time to augment?! Impact of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fixation strength depending on bone mineral density
    Lukas Weiser
    Gerd Huber
    Kay Sellenschloh
    Lennart Viezens
    Klaus Püschel
    Michael M. Morlock
    Wolfgang Lehmann
    European Spine Journal, 2018, 27 : 1964 - 1971
  • [29] Clinical Effects and Complications of Pedicle Screw Augmentation with Bone Cement: Comparison of Fenestrated Screw Augmentation and Vertebroplasty Augmentation
    Kim, Jin Hak
    Ahn, Dong Ki
    Shin, Won Shik
    Kim, Myung Jin
    Lee, Ho Young
    Go, Young Rok
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (02) : 194 - 199
  • [30] Biomechanical investigation of the hybrid modified cortical bone screw-pedicle screw fixation technique: Finite-element analysis
    Kahaer, Alafate
    Maimaiti, Xieraili
    Maitirouzi, Julaiti
    Wang, Shuiquan
    Shi, Wenjie
    Abuduwaili, Nueraihemaiti
    Zhou, Zhihao
    Liu, Dongshan
    Maimaiti, Abulikemu
    Rexiti, Paerhati
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9