Pulse Width Programming in Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Clinical Study

被引:0
|
作者
Yearwood, Thomas L. [1 ]
Hershey, Brad [2 ]
Bradley, Kerry [2 ]
Lee, Dongchul [2 ]
机构
[1] Comprehens Pain & Rehabil, Pascagoula, MS 39581 USA
[2] Boston Sci Neuromodulat, Valencia, CA USA
关键词
Spinal cord stimulation; pulse width; paresthesia; dermatome; implantable pulse generator; neurostimulation; chronic pain; neuropathic; dorsal column; dorsal root; chronaxie; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; INTRACTABLE PAIN; EXCITABLE TISSUE; DORSAL; PERFORMANCE; ADJUSTMENT; EXPERIENCE; DURATION; DESIGN; FIBERS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: With advances in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) technology, particularly rechargeable implantable, patients are now being offered a wider range of parameters to treat their pain. In particular, pulse width (PW) programming ranges of rechargeable implantable pulse generators now match that of radiofrequency systems (with programmability up to 1000 mu s). The intent of the present study was to investigate the effects of varying PW in SCS. Objective: To understand the effects of PW programming in spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Design: Single-center, prospective, randomized, single-blind evaluation of the technical and clinical outcomes of PW programming. Setting: Acute, outpatient follow-up. Methods: Subjects using fully-implanted SCS for > 3 months to treat chronic intractable low back and/or leg pain. Programming of a wide range (50-1000 mu s) of programmed PW settings using each patient's otherwise unchanged 'walk-in' program. Outcome Measures: Paresthesia thresholds (perception, maximum comfortable, discomfort), paresthesia coverage and patient choice of tested programs. Results: We found strength-duration parameters of chronaxie and rheobase to be 295 (242 - 326) mu s and 2.5 (1.3 - 3.3) mA, respectively. The median PW of all patients' 'walk-out' programs was 400 mu s, approximately 48% higher than median chronaxie (P = 0.01), suggesting that chronaxie may not relate to patient-preferred stimulation settings. We found that 7/19 patients selected new PW programs, which significantly increased their paresthesia-pain overlap by 56% on average (P = 0.047). We estimated that 10/19 patients appeared to have greater paresthesia coverage, and 8/19 patients appeared to display a 'caudal shift' of paresthesia coverage with increased PW. Limitations: Small number of patients Conclusions: Variable PW programming in SCS appears to have clinical value, demonstrated by some patients improving their paresthesia-pain overlap, as well as the ability to increase and even 'steer' paresthesia coverage.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 335
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicted effects of pulse width programming in spinal cord stimulation: a mathematical modeling study
    Lee, Dongchul
    Hershey, Brad
    Bradley, Kerry
    Yearwood, Thomas
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2011, 49 (07) : 765 - 774
  • [2] Predicted effects of pulse width programming in spinal cord stimulation: a mathematical modeling study
    Dongchul Lee
    Brad Hershey
    Kerry Bradley
    Thomas Yearwood
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2011, 49
  • [3] The Effect of Pulse Width and Contact Configuration on Paresthesia Coverage in Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Holsheimer, Jan
    Buitenweg, Jan R.
    Das, John
    de Sutter, Paul
    Manola, Ljubomir
    Nuttin, Bart
    NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 68 (05) : 1452 - 1461
  • [4] Testosterone and long pulse width stimulation (TLPS) for denervated muscles after spinal cord injury: a study protocol of randomised clinical trial
    Gorgey, Ashraf S.
    Khalil, Refka E.
    Alrubaye, Malak
    Gill, Ranjodh
    Rivers, Jeannie
    Goetz, Lance L.
    Cifu, David X.
    Castillo, Teodoro
    Caruso, Deborah
    Lavis, Timothy D.
    Lesnefsky, Edward J.
    Cardozo, Christopher C.
    Adler, Robert A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [6] Spinal cord stimulation programming: a crash course
    Breanna Sheldon
    Michael D. Staudt
    Lucian Williams
    Tessa A. Harland
    Julie G. Pilitsis
    Neurosurgical Review, 2021, 44 : 709 - 720
  • [7] Spinal cord stimulation programming: a crash course
    Sheldon, Breanna
    Staudt, Michael D.
    Williams, Lucian
    Harland, Tessa A.
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2021, 44 (02) : 709 - 720
  • [8] Evoked compound action potentials during spinal cord stimulation: effects of posture and pulse width on signal features and neural activation within the spinal cord
    Brucker-Hahn, Meagan K.
    Zander, Hans J.
    Will, Andrew J.
    Vallabh, Jayesh C.
    Wolff, Jason S.
    Dinsmoor, David A.
    Lempka, Scott F.
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 20 (04)
  • [9] Functional Ultrasound Imaging Reveals Activation Properties of Clinical Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy Programming
    Lim, Koeun
    Slee, Sean J.
    Kibler, Andrew
    Falowski, Steven
    Amirdelfan, Kasra
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2025, 18 : 849 - 867
  • [10] Defining the Boundaries of Patient Perception in Spinal Cord Stimulation Programming
    Hatheway, John
    Yang, Michael
    Fishman, Michael
    Verdolin, Michael
    Mcjunkin, Tory
    Rosen, Steven
    Slee, Sean
    Kibler, Andrew
    Amirdelfan, Kasra
    NEUROMODULATION, 2024, 27 (01): : 108 - 117