Defining the Boundaries of Patient Perception in Spinal Cord Stimulation Programming

被引:3
|
作者
Hatheway, John [1 ]
Yang, Michael [2 ]
Fishman, Michael [3 ]
Verdolin, Michael [4 ]
Mcjunkin, Tory [5 ]
Rosen, Steven [6 ]
Slee, Sean [7 ]
Kibler, Andrew [7 ,9 ]
Amirdelfan, Kasra [8 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Pain Care PS, Spokane, WA USA
[2] Summit Pain Alliance, St Rosa, CA USA
[3] Ctr Intervent Pain & Spine, Lancaster, PA USA
[4] Pain Consultants San Diego, La Mesa, CA USA
[5] Arizona Pain Specialists, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[6] Delaware Valley Pain & Spine Inst, Trevose, PA USA
[7] BIOTRONIK NRO Inc, Lake Oswego, OR USA
[8] Boomerang Healthcare, Walnut Creek, CA USA
[9] BIOTRONIK NRO Inc, 6024 Lake Oswego, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2024年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
Cycling; electrode con fi guration; paresthesia threshold; perception; SCS; 10-KHZ HIGH-FREQUENCY; CHRONIC BACK; PARAMETERS; MULTICENTER; MECHANISMS; THRESHOLD; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurom.2023.08.011
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: Recent developments in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) programming have initiated new modalities of imperceptible stimulation. However, the boundaries of sensory perception are not well defined. The BEnchtop NEuromodulation Following endIng of Trial study aimed to create a map of perceptual threshold responses across a broad range of SCS parameters and programming to inform subperception therapy design. Materials and Methods: This multicenter study was conducted at seven US sites. A total of 43 patients with low back and/or leg pain who completed a percutaneous commercial SCS trial were enrolled. Test stimulation was delivered through trial leads for approximately 90 minutes before removal. SCS parameters, including amplitude, frequency, pulse width (PW), electrode configuration, cycling, and multifrequency stimulation were varied during testing. Paresthesia threshold (PT), comfort level (CL), perceptual coverage area, and paresthesia quality (through patient selection of keywords) were collected. Differences were evaluated with analysis of variance followed by post hoc multiple comparisons using t-tests with Bonferroni correction. Results: PT was primarily determined by PW and was insensitive to frequency for constant frequency stimulation (range: 20 Hz- 10 kHz; F(1284) = 69.58, p < 0.0001). For all tests, CL was approximately 25% higher than PT. The dominant variable that influenced paresthesia quality was frequency. Sensations described as comfortable and tingling were most common for frequencies between 60 Hz and 2.4 kHz; unpleasant sensations were generally more common outside this range. Increasing distance between active electrodes from 7 mm to 14 mm, or cycling the SCS waveform at 1 Hz, decreased PT (p < 0.0001). Finally, PT for a low-frequency stimulus (ie, 60 Hz) was unaffected by mixing with a sub-PT high-frequency stimulus. Conclusions: In contrast to previous work investigating narrower ranges, PW primarily influenced PT, independently of frequency. Paresthesia quality was primarily influenced by pulse frequency. These findings advance our understanding of SCS therapy and may be used to improve future novel neuromodulation paradigms.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 117
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Defining the Boundaries of Patient Perception in Spinal Cord Stimulation Programming
    Hatheway, John
    Yang, Michael
    Fishman, Michael
    Verdolin, Michael
    Mcjunkin, Tory
    Rosen, Steven
    Slee, Sean
    Kibler, Andrew
    Amirdelfan, Kasra
    NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 27 (01): : 108 - 117
  • [2] Spinal cord stimulation programming: a crash course
    Breanna Sheldon
    Michael D. Staudt
    Lucian Williams
    Tessa A. Harland
    Julie G. Pilitsis
    Neurosurgical Review, 2021, 44 : 709 - 720
  • [3] Spinal cord stimulation programming: a crash course
    Sheldon, Breanna
    Staudt, Michael D.
    Williams, Lucian
    Harland, Tessa A.
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2021, 44 (02) : 709 - 720
  • [4] Spinal Cord Stimulation: Is It for My Patient?
    Filoramo, Megan
    PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2020, 21 (02) : 210 - 210
  • [5] Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient with Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis
    Zhang, Yi
    Wood, Monica J.
    Gilligan, Christopher
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (03) : 377 - 381
  • [6] Recommendations for patient selection in spinal cord stimulation
    Atkinson, L.
    Sundaraj, S. R.
    Brooker, C.
    O'Callaghan, J.
    Teddy, P.
    Salmon, J.
    Semple, T.
    Majedi, P. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 18 (10) : 1295 - 1302
  • [7] Patient Selection for Rechargeable Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Bedder, M.
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON NEUROPATHIC PAIN (NEUPSIG), 2010, : 1 - 4
  • [8] Outcomes of spinal cord stimulation: Patient validation
    Anderson, VC
    Carlson, C
    Shatin, D
    NEUROMODULATION, 2001, 4 (01): : 11 - 17
  • [9] Pulse Width Programming in Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Clinical Study
    Yearwood, Thomas L.
    Hershey, Brad
    Bradley, Kerry
    Lee, Dongchul
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2010, 13 (04) : 321 - 335
  • [10] Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Lateralization and Programming in Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Roth, Steven G.
    Lange, Steven
    Fama, Chris
    Haller, Jessica
    Briotte, Michael
    Paniccioli, Steven
    DeLaCruz, Priscilla
    Wilock, Meghan
    Pilitsis, Julie
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 123 (02) : A517 - A517