Agrobiodiversity Under Different Property Regimes

被引:12
|
作者
Timmermann, Cristian [1 ]
Robaey, Zoe [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Invest Filosof, Circuito Maestro Mario de la Cueva S-N, Coyoacan, DF, Mexico
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Dept Values Technol & Innovat, Delft, Netherlands
来源
关键词
Crop genetic resources; State sovereignty; Common heritage of humankind; Temporary exclusivity; Sustainable agriculture; Seeds; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; COMMON HERITAGE; BIODIVERSITY; RIGHTS; CONSERVATION; AGROECOLOGY; COMMODIFICATION; AGRICULTURE; SOVEREIGNTY; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1007/s10806-016-9602-2
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Having an adequate and extensively recognized resource governance system is essential for the conservation and sustainable use of crop genetic resources in a highly populated planet. Despite the widely accepted importance of agrobiodiversity for future plant breeding and thus food security, there is still pervasive disagreement at the individual level on who should own genetic resources. The aim of the article is to provide conceptual clarification on the following concepts and their relation to agrobiodiversity stewardship: open access, commons, private property, state property and common heritage of humankind. After presenting each property regime, we will examine whether and how these incentivize the conservation, improvement and sharing of crop genetic resources, and conclude by defending a mixed property regime.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 303
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agrobiodiversity Under Different Property Regimes
    Cristian Timmermann
    Zoë Robaey
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2016, 29 : 285 - 303
  • [2] Protection of property rights under special legal regimes
    Moskaliuk, Nadiia
    Myronenko, Valentyna
    Shapoval, Lesia
    Gopanchuk, Vasyl
    Kaliniuk, Anzhela
    CUESTIONES POLITICAS, 2022, 40 (75): : 352 - 369
  • [3] Party autonomy under the EU Regulation on matrimonial property regimes
    de Sousa Goncalves, Anabela Susana
    RED-REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE DIREITO, 2020, 22 (02): : 76 - 93
  • [4] Experimental results on bargaining under alternative property rights regimes
    Croson, R
    Johnston, JS
    JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2000, 16 (01): : 50 - 73
  • [5] THE FISHER HYPOTHESIS UNDER DIFFERENT MONETARY REGIMES
    BARTHOLD, TA
    DOUGAN, WR
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1986, 68 (04) : 674 - 679
  • [6] Pirarucu growth under different feeding regimes
    Gandra, Andre L.
    Ituassu, Daniel R.
    Pereira-Filho, Manoel
    Roubach, Rodrigo
    Crescencio, Roger
    Cavero, Bruno A. S.
    AQUACULTURE INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 15 (01) : 91 - 96
  • [7] Pirarucu growth under different feeding regimes
    André L. Gandra
    Daniel R. Ituassú
    Manoel Pereira-Filho
    Rodrigo Roubach
    Roger Crescêncio
    Bruno A. S. Cavero
    Aquaculture International, 2007, 15 : 91 - 96
  • [8] PERSISTENCE OF SAINFOIN UNDER DIFFERENT GRAZING REGIMES
    MOWREY, DP
    MATCHES, AG
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1991, 83 (04) : 714 - 716
  • [9] Auditor Reputation Under Different Negligence Regimes
    Bigus, Jochen
    ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2015, 51 (03): : 356 - 378
  • [10] Growth and development under different corruption regimes
    Wang, Yuan
    MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 2020, 88 (02): : 305 - 323