PERSISTENCE OF SAINFOIN UNDER DIFFERENT GRAZING REGIMES

被引:12
|
作者
MOWREY, DP [1 ]
MATCHES, AG [1 ]
机构
[1] TEXAS TECH UNIV,DEPT AGRON HORT & ENTOMOL,LUBBOCK,TX 79409
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300040013x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia Scop.), a non-bloat inducing legume, is well adapted to the calcareous soils of the Southern Great Plains. Poor persistence under some managements has limited its use for grazing. Our objectives were to determine the effect of plant growth stage at defoliation and defoliation intensity on persistence of sainfoin. Nitrogen fertilized (100 kg N ha-1) 'Renumex' sainfoin was grown under irrigation on a Pullman clay loam (fine, mixed, thermic Torretic Paleustoll) near Lubbock, TX. Light (L), medium (M), and heavy (H) grazing intensities were applied at the bud (B), flower (F), and seed shatter (S) stages of growth. Across growth stages, L, M, and H intensities averaged 52, 69, and 87% removal of pre-graze herbage mass, respectively. Over the 2 yr, sainfoin stands declined 20 and 43% when defoliated at the B and F stages under H defoliation intensity. Stands remained above 80% for the L and M intensities. Stands increased from reseeding in the S treatments by 35, 31, and 16% for the L, M, and H defoliations, respectively. Root concentrations of total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC) began to decrease with the initiation of spring growth, reached their seasonal low in June, and then increased into late summer and autumn. Average TNC for H (130 g kg-1) was less than TNC in roots of L and M (155 g kg-1). Our findings indicate that sainfoin defoliated at the B or F stages of growth under L or M intensities of defoliation may have acceptable stand persistence when grown under irrigation in the Southern Great Plains.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 716
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] YIELD, REGROWTH, AND PERSISTENCE OF SAINFOIN UNDER FERTILIZATION
    MEYER, DW
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1975, 67 (03) : 439 - 411
  • [2] Grassland Community Composition Response to Grazing Intensity Under Different Grazing Regimes
    Zhang, Chunping
    Dong, Quanmin
    Chu, Hui
    Shi, Jianjun
    Li, Shixiong
    Wang, Yanlong
    Yang, Xiaoxia
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2018, 71 (02) : 196 - 204
  • [3] Persistence of chlorpyrifos in soils under different moisture regimes
    Awasthi, MD
    Prakash, NB
    PESTICIDE SCIENCE, 1997, 50 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [4] MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF HERBACEOUS COMMUNITIES UNDER DIFFERENT GRAZING REGIMES
    DIAZ, S
    ACOSTA, A
    CABIDO, M
    JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (05) : 689 - 696
  • [5] Evaluation of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) for forage yield and persistence in sainfoin-alfalfa (Medicago sativa) mixtures and under different harvest frequencies
    Biligetu, Bill
    Jefferson, Paul G.
    Lardner, Herbert A.
    Acharya, Surya N.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2021, 101 (04) : 525 - 535
  • [6] SURVIVAL OF JUVENILE BASIN BIG SAGEBRUSH UNDER DIFFERENT GRAZING REGIMES
    OWENS, MK
    NORTON, BE
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1990, 43 (02): : 132 - 135
  • [7] PRODUCTIVITY AND PERSISTENCE OF RHIZOMA PEANUT PASTURES UNDER DIFFERENT GRAZING MANAGEMENTS
    ORTEGA, JA
    SOLLENBERGER, LE
    QUESENBERRY, KH
    CORNELL, JA
    JONES, CS
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1992, 84 (05) : 799 - 804
  • [8] Alachlor and cyanazine persistence in soil under different tillage and rainfall regimes
    Sadeghi, AM
    Isensee, AR
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1997, 162 (06) : 430 - 438
  • [9] Non-linear dynamics of litter decomposition under different grazing management regimes
    Banegas, Natalia
    Albanesi, Ada S.
    Pedraza, Raul O.
    Dos Santos, Daniel A.
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2015, 393 (1-2) : 47 - 56
  • [10] Non-linear dynamics of litter decomposition under different grazing management regimes
    Natalia Banegas
    Ada S. Albanesi
    Raúl O. Pedraza
    Daniel A. Dos Santos
    Plant and Soil, 2015, 393 : 47 - 56