Firm ownership structure impact on corporate social responsibility: evidence from austerity UK

被引:15
|
作者
Elgergeni, Siham [1 ]
Khan, Nadeem [2 ]
Kakabadse, Nada K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Northampton, Northampton Business Sch, Financial Management, Northampton, England
[2] UoR, Henley Business Sch, Governance Policy & Leadership, Henley On Thames, England
[3] UoR, Henley Business Sch, Policy Governance & Eth, Henley On Thames, England
关键词
Sustainable development; ownership structure; corporate social responsibility (CSR); attainment discrepancy; organisational slack; firm performance; INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP; BOARD COMPOSITION; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATIONS; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; SHAREHOLDER VALUE; MODERATING ROLES; MARKET VALUATION; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; CSR;
D O I
10.1080/13504509.2018.1450306
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an increasingly important sustainable development issue in U.K. The main contribution of this study is to examine how firm ownership structure impacts good corporate governance and CSR in U.K. during austerity conditions. Following the financial crisis of 2007-2008, the U.K. government introduced austerity conditions which impacted firm CSR activities. From the initial sample of more than 250 firms, 50 consistently remain listed on the FTSE4good index during 2008-2012 and are analysed. The definition of CSR distinguishes voluntary and mandatory CSR construct. Findings indicate Board ownership structure and satisfactory firm performance impact on the level of voluntary CSR. Board ownership results suggest increased institutional and non-CEO shareholdings support a higher level of voluntary CSR engagement, whilst increased CEO shareholdings lead to a lower level of investment in voluntary CSR. In terms of satisfactory firm performance, results suggest positive attainment discrepancy supports a higher level of voluntary CSR, whereas greater potential organisational slack leads to a lower level of voluntary CSR investment. Effective governance and voluntary CSR association is more pronounced under conditions of high attainment discrepancy and low organisational slack. The findings suggest implications for adapting firm decision-making latitude and government policy between austerity and prosperity conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 618
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value: Evidence from Korea
    Kim, Woo Sung
    Park, Kunsu
    Lee, Sang Hoon
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (07)
  • [2] Ultimate ownership, corporate social responsibility and firm value: evidence from China
    Su, Kun
    Fu, Senliulu
    Meng, Yuan
    Wan, Rui
    CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2025,
  • [3] Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Firm Investment Efficiency: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market
    Alobaid, Rayed Obaid Hammoud
    Qasem, Ameen
    Al-Qadasi, Adel Ali
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (15)
  • [4] Employee ownership, corporate social responsibility and financial performance: evidence from the UK
    Orazayeva, Assem
    Arslan, Muhammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING, 2022, 14 (04) : 362 - 377
  • [5] The Impact of Government Ownership and Corporate Governance on the Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from UAE
    Farhan, Ayda
    Freihat, Abdel Razaq Farah
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2021, 8 (01): : 851 - 861
  • [6] Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and corporate governance-An analysis of the Brazilian firm
    Forte, Hyane Correia
    Crisostomo, Vicente Lima
    Lopez-Iturriaga, Felix Javier
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 32 (01) : 866 - 880
  • [7] Relationships Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Value, and Institutional Ownership: Evidence from Indonesia
    Hermeindito, Hermeindito
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2022, 9 (05): : 365 - 376
  • [8] The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea
    Oh, Won Yong
    Chang, Young Kyun
    Martynov, Aleksey
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 104 (02) : 283 - 297
  • [9] The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea
    Won Yong Oh
    Young Kyun Chang
    Aleksey Martynov
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2011, 104 : 283 - 297
  • [10] Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence from China
    Wenjing Li
    Ran Zhang
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 96 : 631 - 645