BIE using multivariant t-distribution and the iFlex method for GNSS PPP

被引:0
|
作者
Duong, Viet [1 ]
Choy, Suelynn [2 ]
Rizos, Chris [3 ]
机构
[1] Hemisphere GNSS USA Inc, R&D Engn Dept, Scottsdale, AZ 85255 USA
[2] RMIT Univ, Sch Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
RESOLUTION; GALILEO; QZSS; GPS;
D O I
10.33012/2021.17869
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Reliable ambiguity resolution is the key to obtaining centimetre-level accuracy in high precision GNSS positioning techniques such as Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) and Precise Point Positioning (PPP). In this contribution, an approach for partial ambiguity resolution based on the best integer equivariant estimator using the multivariant t-distribution (BIE-td) is proposed and compared against the iFlex method proposed by the Trimble Navigation company. A 31-day set of GNSS measurements, collected in 2018 from 17 globally distributed GNSS continuously operating reference stations (CORS), were processed to determine the best-fit distribution for the GNSS measurements. It is found that the t-distribution with three degrees of freedom provides a better fit compared to the Gaussian distribution. Finally, an additional 7-day set of GNSS measurements, collected in 2019 from the same CORS, confirms that the positioning performance using the BIE-td and iFlex method using Laplace and Maxmin function is comparable, with a similar positioning accuracy for both the horizontal and vertical coordinate components. Significantly, both the BIE-td and iFlex methods using Laplace (or Maxmin) outperform the BIE using the Gaussian function. Although the iFlex method reduces computational burden compared to the BIE-td, its function such as Laplace or Maxmin is not mathematically rigorous, and hence the BIE-td method is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 464
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Addressing non-normality in multivariate analysis using the t-distribution
    Osorio, Felipe
    Galea, Manuel
    Henriquez, Claudio
    Arellano-Valle, Reinaldo
    ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 107 (04) : 785 - 813
  • [22] Robust mixture modelling using multivariate t-distribution with missing information
    Wang, HX
    Zhang, QB
    Luo, B
    Wei, S
    PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2004, 25 (06) : 701 - 710
  • [23] Using the t-distribution to improve the absolute structure assignment with likelihood calculations
    Hooft, Rob W. W.
    Straver, Leo H.
    Spek, Anthony L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, 2010, 43 : 665 - 668
  • [24] An Extension of the Student's T-distribution Mixture Model and the Gradient Descent Method
    Xiong, Taisong
    Gou, Jianping
    Rao, Yunbo
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS, 2013, 8 (07) : 1750 - 1757
  • [25] Analysis of local influence in geostatistics using Student's t-distribution
    Assumpcao, R. A. B.
    Uribe-Opazo, M. A.
    Galea, M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2014, 41 (11) : 2323 - 2341
  • [26] A robust time scale for space applications using the student's t-distribution
    McPhee, Hamish
    Tourneret, Jean-Yves
    Valat, David
    Delporte, Jerome
    Gregoire, Yoan
    Paimblanc, Philippe
    METROLOGIA, 2024, 61 (05)
  • [27] Robust Power System State Estimation Using t-Distribution Noise Model
    Chen, Tengpeng
    Sun, Lu
    Ling, Keck-Voon
    Ho, Weng Khuen
    IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (01): : 771 - 781
  • [28] Robust Inference in the Capital Asset Pricing Model Using the Multivariate t-distribution
    Galea, Manuel
    Cademartori, David
    Curci, Roberto
    Molina, Alonso
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (06)
  • [29] Robust nonlinear system identification: Bayesian mixture of experts using the t-distribution
    Baldacchino, Tara
    Worden, Keith
    Rowson, Jennifer
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2017, 85 : 977 - 992
  • [30] ML-ESTIMATION OF THE T-DISTRIBUTION USING EM AND ITS EXTENSIONS, ECM AND ECME
    LIU, CH
    RUBIN, DB
    STATISTICA SINICA, 1995, 5 (01) : 19 - 39