Effects of Hearing Preservation on Psychophysical Responses to Cochlear Implant Stimulation

被引:59
|
作者
Kang, Stephen Y. [1 ]
Colesa, Deborah J. [1 ]
Swiderski, Donald L. [1 ]
Su, Gina L. [1 ]
Raphael, Yehoash [1 ]
Pfingst, Bryan E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Kresge Hearing Res Inst, Dept Otolaryngol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
electrical stimulation; residual hearing; auditory prosthesis; guinea pig; neomycin; hair cells; spiral ganglion; CHRONIC ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; SPIRAL GANGLION NEURONS; AUDITORY-NERVE; GUINEA-PIG; ELECTROMOTILE HEARING; MORPHOLOGICAL-CHANGES; ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; MODULATION DETECTION; DETECTION THRESHOLDS; RESIDUAL HEARING;
D O I
10.1007/s10162-009-0194-7
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Previous studies have shown that residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear implant function to improve speech recognition in noise as well as perception of music. The current study had two primary objectives. First, we sought to determine how cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation over a time period of 14 to 21 months influence cochlear structures such as hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons. Second, we sought to investigate whether the structures that provide acoustic hearing also affect the perception of electrical stimulation. We compared psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation in two groups of adult guinea pigs. Group I (11 animals) received a cochlear implant in a previously untreated ear, while group II (ten animals) received a cochlear implant in an ear that had been previously infused with neomycin to destroy hearing. Psychophysical thresholds were measured in response to pulse-train and sinusoidal stimuli. Histological analysis of all group I animals and a subset of group II animals was performed. Nine of the 11 group I animals showed survival of the organ of Corti and spiral ganglion neurons adjacent to the electrode array. All group I animals showed survival of these elements in regions apical to the electrode array. Group II animals that were examined histologically showed complete loss of the organ of Corti in regions adjacent and apical to the electrode array and severe spiral ganglion neuron loss, consistent with previous reports for neomycin-treated ears. Behaviorally, group II animals had significantly lower thresholds than group I animals in response to 100 Hz sinusoidal stimuli. However, group I animals had significantly lower thresholds than group II animals in response to pulse-train stimuli (0.02 ms/phase; 156 to 5,000 pps). Additionally, the two groups showed distinct threshold versus pulse rate functions. We hypothesize that the differences in detection thresholds between groups are caused by the electrical activation of the hair cells in group I animals and/or differences between groups in the condition of the spiral ganglion neurons.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 265
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predicting Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implant Surgery by using AI Comment
    Rudack, Claudia
    Heitkoetter, Felix
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2024, 103 (08) : 562 - 563
  • [32] The Relation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Type and Position on Continued Hearing Preservation
    Perkins, Elizabeth L.
    Labadie, Robert F.
    O'Malley, Matthew
    Bennett, Marc
    Noble, Jack H.
    Haynes, David S.
    Gifford, Rene
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (06) : E634 - E640
  • [33] Long-term Hearing Preservation in Electric Acoustic Cochlear Implant Candidates
    Sprinzl, Georg Mathias
    Schoerg, Philipp
    Edlinger, Stefan Herwig
    Magele, Astrid
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06) : 750 - 757
  • [34] Dynamic range of cochlear implant stimulation is larger in residually hearing cochlea
    Sato, Mika
    Kral, Andrej
    ACOUSTICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 41 (01) : 380 - 381
  • [35] Do Perioperative Systemic Corticosteroids Improve Cochlear Implant Hearing Preservation Outcomes?
    Killeen, Daniel E.
    Kutz, Joe W., Jr.
    Hunter, Jacob B.
    Isaacson, Brandon
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2022, 132 (02): : 255 - 256
  • [36] Psychophysical threshold variability in cochlear implant subjects
    Ferguson, WD
    Collins, LM
    Smith, DW
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2003, 180 (1-2) : 101 - 113
  • [37] Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation
    Shepherd, Robert
    Gantz, Bruce
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2023, 434
  • [38] Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation
    Campbell A.P.
    Dillon M.T.
    Buchman C.A.
    Adunka O.F.
    Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports, 2013, 1 (2) : 69 - 79
  • [39] Cochlear Microphonics in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantees
    Lorens, Artur
    Walkowiak, Adam
    Polak, Marek
    Kowalczuk, Aleksandra
    Furmanek, Mariusz
    Skarzynski, Henryk
    Obrycka, Anita
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2019, 15 (03): : 345 - 351
  • [40] Hearing aid and cochlear implant
    Matsumoto, Nozomu
    Journal of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, 2015, 98 (04): : 272 - 278