Modelling strategies for numerical simulation of aircraft ditching

被引:26
|
作者
Bisagni, C. [1 ]
Pigazzini, M. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Aerosp Engn, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Struct Engn, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
Ditching; fluid-structure interaction; water impact; ALE; hybrid Lagrangian-SPH; FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; FLOOR STRUCTURE; WATER IMPACT; ALE METHOD; HELICOPTER; CRASHWORTHINESS; HYDRODYNAMICS; AEROSPACE; AIRPLANE;
D O I
10.1080/13588265.2017.1328957
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Ditching, which is a controlled landing of an airplane on water, is an emergency condition to be investigated in order to improve the aircraft global crashworthiness. The complex hydrodynamic phenomena involved in ditching events are difficult to simulate and the accuracy of the results depends on the capability to reproduce the forces related to the interaction of the fuselage with the water surface. In the first part of the paper, the vertical impact on water of a rigid sphere is analysed using the explicit solver LS-DYNA in order to compare different modelling strategies. Four models of the fluid domain are presented: Lagrangian, arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian, smoothed particle hydrodynamics and hybrid Lagrangian-smoothed particle hydrodynamics. In the second part, the ditching of a scaled simplified airplane is simulated considering two different models for the water region. Experimental data from the literature are used to validate the simulations. The analysis, where the water and the air are modelled with the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method, shows a better correlation with the experimental data because this formulation can reproduce the suction force which acts on the fuselage and affects significantly the ditching dynamics.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 394
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The numerical simulation of aircraft evacuation and its application to aircraft design and certification
    Owen, M
    Galea, ER
    Lawrence, PJ
    Filippidis, L
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 102 (1016): : 301 - 312
  • [42] A numerical simulation method for aircraft infrared imaging
    Zhou, Yue
    Wang, Qiang
    Li, Ting
    Hu, Haiyang
    INFRARED PHYSICS & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 83 : 68 - 77
  • [43] NUMERICAL-SIMULATION OF CRUISER OR AIRCRAFT LIGHTNING
    MONAVON, M
    LEROY, M
    ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 1987, 23 (12) : 640 - 642
  • [44] Numerical simulation of ice accretions on an aircraft wing
    Cao, Yihua
    Ma, Chao
    Zhang, Qiang
    Sheridan, John
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 23 (01) : 296 - 304
  • [45] Numerical simulation of missile separated from aircraft
    Astronautics College, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China
    Xitong Fangzhen Xuebao / Journal of System Simulation, 2008, 20 (12): : 3120 - 3122
  • [46] Research on the Numerical Simulation of Aircraft Cabin Smoke
    Yang, Shibin
    Sun, Xiaozhe
    Yu, Tianpeng
    Chen, Xiyuan
    9TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (ISHVAC) JOINT WITH THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUILDING ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT (COBEE), 2015, 121 : 357 - 364
  • [47] The MEGAFLOW project - Numerical flow simulation for aircraft
    Rossow, CC
    Kroll, N
    Schwamborn, D
    PROGRESS IN INDUSTRIAL MATHEMATICS AT ECMI 2004, 2006, 8 : 3 - +
  • [48] Numerical simulation of an inflated structure for an aircraft hangar
    Gonzalez, Jose Manuel
    Marcipar, Javier
    Estruch, Carles
    Cuartero, Eric
    Onate, Eugenio
    IASS 60TH ANNIVERSARY SYMPOSIUM (IASS SYMPOSIUM 2019) - 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEXTILE COMPOSITES AND INFLATABLE STRUCTURES (STRUCTURAL MEMBRANES 2019), 2019, : 1224 - 1231
  • [49] Numerical Simulation Quality Assessment for Transport Aircraft
    Becker, Klaus
    Haeuser, Jochem
    MEGADESIGN AND MEGAOPT - GERMAN INITIATIVES FOR AERODYNAMIC SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION IN AIRCRAFT DESIGN, 2009, 107 : 121 - +
  • [50] Numerical simulation of ice accretions on aircraft wing
    Li, Xin
    Bai, Jun-Qiang
    Wang, Kun
    Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28 (12): : 2663 - 2670