How do Chinese undergraduates understand critical thinking? A phenomenographic approach

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Xiantong [1 ]
Liu, Xu [2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ, Fac Educ, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Higher Educ Studies, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
critical thinking; undergraduates; conceptions; phenomenography; teaching;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2022.956428
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The cultivation of critical thinking in undergraduates is crucial for teaching in higher education. Although scholars have defined critical thinking in various ways, limited study about critical thinking from the learner's perspective. In this phenomenographic research, we collect essays written by 80 Chinese undergraduates with multiple disciplinary backgrounds to reveal their understandings of critical thinking. Four conceptions of critical thinking were found, namely critical thinking as query and reflection on the irrationality of things (Conception 1); an objective and comprehensive understanding of things (Conception 2); independent thinking with innovation (Conception 3), as well as a willingness and attitude (Conception 4). Further analysis in the light of the referential-structural framework helps to construct a hierarchical relationship between different conceptions, with Conception 1 the least complex and Conception 3 the most complex. While Conceptions 1-3 are skill-oriented, Conception 4 is deposition-oriented, and there is no hierarchical relationship between the two groups of conceptions. They deal with different dimensions of critical thinking. University lecturers can use these findings to help equip undergraduates with deepened conceptions of critical thinking in their daily routine teaching.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How to understand Chinese aesthetics
    Feng, Peng
    FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK, 2006, 27 (01) : 153 - +
  • [22] HOW TO UNDERSTAND CHINESE PAINTING
    FONG, WC
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, 1971, 115 (04) : 282 - 292
  • [23] Critical Thinking: How Do He Know It in Nursing Education and Practice?
    Fitzpatrick, Joyce J.
    NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 26 (05) : 261 - 261
  • [24] COMPARISON OF CRITICAL THINKING IN UNDERGRADUATES AND GRADUATES IN SPECIAL EDUCATION
    Zascavage, Victoria
    Masten, William G.
    Schroeder-Steward, Jennifer
    Nichols, Christopher
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2007, 22 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [25] DIFFERENTIATING CRITICAL THINKING DISPOSITIONS OF NEWLY ENROLLED EFL UNDERGRADUATES AND POSTGRADUATES THROUGH SVM APPROACH
    Wei, Yueer
    Hu, Jie
    MECHATRONIC SYSTEMS AND CONTROL, 2020, 48 (03): : 159 - 164
  • [26] How to read, understand, and write 'Discussion' sections in medical articles. An exercise in critical thinking
    Jenicek, Milos
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2006, 12 (06): : SR28 - SR36
  • [27] Gender differences in critical thinking and strategy use in English writing from sources among Chinese EFL undergraduates
    Zhao, Pengfei
    Liao, Xian
    Yao, Yuan
    THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2024, 52
  • [28] How much anatomy do undergraduates need?
    Silverthorn, DU
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2001, 15 (04): : A374 - A374
  • [29] Gamification in online discussions: How do game elements affect critical thinking?
    Tzelepi, Maria
    Makri, Katerina
    Petroulis, Ioannis
    Moundridou, Maria
    Papanikolaou, Kyparisia
    2020 IEEE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (ICALT 2020), 2020, : 92 - 94
  • [30] How Do Technology-Enhanced Learning Tools Support Critical Thinking?
    Le, Nguyen-Thinh
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2019, 4