Impact of Diaphragm Behavior on the Seismic Design of Low-Rise Steel Buildings

被引:0
|
作者
Rogers, Colin A. [1 ]
Tremblay, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Civil Engn & Appl Mech, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
[2] Ecole Polytech, Grp Res Struct Engn, Montreal, PQ H3C 3A7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
diaphragms; seismic performance; low-rise steel buildings; ROOF DECK DIAPHRAGMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Modern building codes allow engineers to use reduced seismic loads in design provided that the seismic load resisting system (SLRS) of the structure is adequately designed and detailed to withstand strong ground shaking through ductile inelastic response. This approach has been adopted by the North American model codes, which typically include special provisions to achieve satisfactory inelastic seismic performance. Single-story buildings often incorporate a steel roof deck diaphragm that is relied on to transfer lateral loads to the vertical bracing bents. The vertical braces are usually selected as the energy dissipating fuse element, while the diaphragm and other elements in the SLRS should be designed such that their capacity exceeds the nominal resistance of the braces. Steel bracing members designed for compression inherently possess significant reserve strength when loaded in tension, which means that large brace tension loads must be considered in the design of the surrounding protected structural components. Capacity design seismic provisions have led to the need for much thicker roof deck panels and more closely spaced diaphragm connection patterns compared with past practice in Canada. This paper describes the current U.S. seismic design approach and provides examples as it is applied to single-story buildings and their diaphragms. An overview of the related aspects of an ongoing research project on the flexibility and ductility of the roof diaphragm in low-rise steel buildings is also included.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 36
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Developing a frictional vibration damper for low-rise steel buildings
    Tabuchi, J.
    Hodzumi, H.
    Saeki, M.
    Stessa 2006, 2006, : 771 - 776
  • [32] Simplified method for the seismic design of low-rise, shear wall base-isolated buildings
    Tena-Colunga, Arturo
    Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 2014, 8 (01): : 22 - 33
  • [33] FOUNDATIONS FOR LOW-RISE BUILDINGS
    TOMLINSON, MJ
    DRISCOLL, R
    BURLAND, JB
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEER-PART A, 1978, 56 (06): : 161 - 173
  • [34] Foundations for low-rise buildings
    Driscoll, R.M.C.
    Crilly, M.S.
    Butcher, A.P.
    Structural engineer London, 1996, 74 (11): : 179 - 185
  • [35] Seismic simulation and design of low-rise CBF buildings with and without dissipative connections using OpenSees
    Tirca, L.
    Caprarelli, C.
    Danila, N.
    STESSA 2012: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, 2012, : 365 - 371
  • [36] Inelastic seismic demand of low-rise buildings with soil-flexibility
    Roy, Rana
    Dutta, Sekhar Chandra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NON-LINEAR MECHANICS, 2010, 45 (04) : 419 - 432
  • [37] Effect of soil parameter uncertainty on seismic demand of low-rise steel buildings on dense silty sand
    Raychowdhury, Prishati
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (10) : 1367 - 1378
  • [38] Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise buildings in regions with infrequent earthquakes
    Hassan, AF
    Sozen, MA
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 1997, 94 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [39] Seismic evaluation of low-rise reinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms
    Cohen, Gregory L.
    Klingner, Richard E.
    Hayes, John R., Jr.
    Sweeney, Steven C.
    MASONRY, 2008, 1496 : 109 - +