Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: development of a patient-based measure of outcome

被引:0
|
作者
Hobart, JC
Riazi, A
Lamping, DL
Fitzpatrick, R
Thompson, AJ
机构
[1] UCL Inst Neurol, Neurol Outcome Measures Unit, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] Derriford Hosp, Peninsula Med Sch, Plymouth PL6 8DH, Devon, England
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Hlth Serv Res Unit, London, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Inst Hlth Sci, Div Publ Hlth & Primary Hlth Care, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To develop a patient-based, disease-specific measure of the health impact of multiple sclerosis ( MS) for use in clinical trials and clinical practice. Data sources: People with MS. Members of the MS Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Methods: Standard psychometric methods were used to develop the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) in three stages. Stage 1 ( item generation): questionnaire items were generated from 30 patient interviews on the impact of MS on their lives, expert opinion and literature review. Stage 2 ( item reduction and scale generation): the questionnaire developed in stage 1 was administered by postal survey to 1530 randomly selected members of the MS Society. Standard item reduction techniques were used to develop a rating scale from the pool of questionnaire items. Stage 3 ( psychometric evaluation): the questionnaire was evaluated for data quality, scaling assumptions, acceptability, reliability and validity in a separate postal survey of 1250 MS Society members. Responsiveness was evaluated in 55 people admitted to hospital for rehabilitation and intravenous steroid treatment of MS relapses. Results: Stage 1 resulted in a 129-item questionnaire. Stage 2 resulted in a 29-item rating scale measuring the physical and psychological impact of MS. The MSIS-29 satisfied all recommended psychometric criteria for rigorous measurement. Data quality was excellent: missing data were low, item test - retest reliability was high and scale scores could be generated for over 98% of respondents. Item descriptive statistics, item convergent and discriminant validity, and factor analysis supported summing items to produce two summary scores. MSIS-29 physical and psychological scale scores showed good variability, low floor and ceiling effects, good internal consistency and test - retest reliability. Correlations with other measures and confirmation of hypotheses about group differences provided evidence for the validity of the MSIS-29 as a measure of the physical and psychological impact of multiple sclerosis. Effect sizes provided preliminary evidence for responsiveness. Conclusions: The 29-item MSIS-29 is a rigorous new measure of the physical and psychological impact of MS. All psychometric criteria were satisfied and there is preliminary evidence of responsiveness. The MSIS-29 is particularly appropriate for use in clinical trials to evaluate therapeutic effectiveness from the patient's perspective. Further critical evaluations of the MSIS-29 completed by people with neurologist-confirmed MS in different settings are suggested. Head-to-head comparisons of the psychometric properties of the MSIS-29 and other outcome measures for MS will help to determine the relative advantages of different instruments so that the choice of measures for studies can be evidence based.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / +
页数:43
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The international development of patient-reported outcome indices for multiple sclerosis
    Doward, L.
    McKenna, S.
    Meads, D.
    Jovell, A.
    Fisk, J.
    Eckert, B.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 253 : 125 - 125
  • [32] Patient-Based Outcome Assessment Instruments in Acupuncture Research
    Khorsan, Raheleh
    York, Alexandra
    Coulter, Ian D.
    Wurzman, Rachel
    Walter, Joan A. G.
    Coeytaux, Remy R.
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2010, 16 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [33] Dietary Interventions in Multiple Sclerosis: Development and Pilot-Testing of an Evidence Based Patient Education Program
    Riemann-Lorenz, Karin
    Eilers, Marlene
    von Geldern, Gloria
    Schulz, Karl-Heinz
    Kopke, Sascha
    Heesen, Christoph
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (10):
  • [34] Development and validation of a patient based measure of outcome in ocular melanoma
    Foss, AJE
    Lamping, DL
    Schroter, S
    Hungerford, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 84 (04) : 347 - 351
  • [35] Development of a patient-based grading scale for PedMIDAS
    Hershey, AD
    Powers, SW
    Vockell, AL
    LeCates, SL
    Segers, A
    Kabbouche, MA
    CEPHALALGIA, 2004, 24 (10) : 844 - 849
  • [36] Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis - The importance of the outcome measure
    Zajicek, J
    Thompson, A
    Hobart, J
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 75 (08): : 1215 - 1215
  • [37] Advances in using imaging as an outcome measure in multiple sclerosis
    Miller, D. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2004, 11 : 4 - 4
  • [38] Development of a brief clinician-reported outcome measure of multiple sclerosis signs and symptoms: The Clinician Rating of Multiple Sclerosis (CRoMS)
    Matza, Louis S.
    Stewart, Katie D.
    Phillips, Glenn
    Delio, Philip
    Naismith, Robert T.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2019, 35 : 253 - 261
  • [39] The role of MRI as a surrogate outcome measure in multiple sclerosis
    McFarland, HF
    Barkhof, F
    Antel, J
    Miller, DH
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (01) : 40 - 51
  • [40] Measuring and improving performance of clinicians: an application of patient-based records
    Dong, Minye
    Xiao, Yuyin
    Shi, Chenshu
    Li, Guohong
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)