On the origin of the controversial electrostatic field effect in superconductors

被引:40
|
作者
Golokolenov, I [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guthrie, A. [1 ]
Kafanov, S. [1 ]
Pashkin, Yu A. [1 ]
Tsepelin, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Dept Phys, Lancaster, England
[2] RAS, PL Kapitza Inst Phys Problems, Moscow, Russia
[3] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Moscow, Russia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
SUPERCURRENT; NOISE;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-021-22998-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Superconducting quantum devices offer numerous applications, from electrical metrology and magnetic sensing to energy-efficient high-end computing and advanced quantum information processing. The key elements of quantum circuits are (single and double) Josephson junctions controllable either by electric current or magnetic field. The voltage control, commonly used in semiconductor-based devices via the electrostatic field effect, would be far more versatile and practical. Hence, the field effect recently reported in superconducting devices may revolutionise the whole field of superconductor electronics provided it is confirmed. Here we show that the suppression of the critical current attributed to the field effect, can be explained by quasiparticle excitations in the constriction of superconducting devices. Our results demonstrate that a miniscule leakage current between the gate and the constriction of devices perfectly follows the Fowler-Nordheim model of electron field emission from a metal electrode and injects quasiparticles with energies sufficient to weaken or even suppress superconductivity. A recent report on electrostatic field effect in superconducting devices provides a high potential for advanced quantum technology, but it remains controversial. Here, the authors report that the suppression of critical current, which was attributed to the field effect, can instead be explained by quasiparticle excitations in the constriction of superconducting devices.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] mTBI - a controversial field
    Kemp, Steven
    Baker, Gus A.
    Dewer, Bonnie-Kate
    PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 31 : 3 - 3
  • [32] Effect of electrostatic field on photoresist coating uniformity
    Zhou, WZ
    MICROLITHOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES IN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT FABRICATION II, 2000, 4226 : 107 - 114
  • [33] Effect of electrostatic field on deposition of dielectric particles
    Li, Guo-Feng
    Wang, Zhi-Qiang
    Dalian Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2010, 50 (06): : 845 - 849
  • [34] EFFECT OF AN ELECTROSTATIC-FIELD ON MITOSIS OF CELLS
    NG, W
    PIEKARSKA, K
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1975, 13 (01): : 107 - 111
  • [35] The effect of the electrostatic field on the deflection of microcantilever biosensors
    Merlo, Manuele
    Negretto, Fabio
    Montevecchi, Franco Maria
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH BIENNIAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND ANALYSIS, VOL 2, 2006, : 415 - 422
  • [37] Effect of Humidity on Nep Movement in Electrostatic Field
    Cao, Jipeng
    Li, Yanhui
    Sun, Pengzi
    ADVANCES IN TEXTILE ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS III, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 821-822 : 393 - 397
  • [38] Effect of an Electrostatic Field on the Boiling of a Liquid Film
    Martynov, Y. V.
    Karayiannis, T. G.
    Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 31 (04):
  • [39] Effect of surface roughness on the electrostatic field of an RPC
    Jash, A.
    Majumdar, N.
    Mukhopadhyay, S.
    Chattopadhyay, S.
    XXVII IUPAP CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS (CCP2015), 2016, 759
  • [40] On the electrostatic effect of a changing magnetic field.
    Kuehne, J. M.
    PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE, 1910, 19 (109-14) : 461 - 476