The influence of injection rate on the hypnotic effect of propofol during anesthesia: A randomized trial

被引:12
|
作者
Blum, Jasmin [1 ]
Kochs, Eberhard [1 ]
Forster, Nicole [1 ]
Schneider, Gerhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Anesthesiol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
来源
PLOS CLINICAL TRIALS | 2006年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pctr.0010017
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: Previous studies suggested that slow injection of propofol may increase the hypnotic effect during induction of anesthesia. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate whether injection rate of propofol has an influence on its maximum effect. Design: Randomized, single-blind trial. Setting: This study has been carried out in the operating rooms of a university hospital. An anesthesiologist and a resident performed the study with the aid of changing nursing staff. Participants: We investigated 99 unpremedicated patients aged 18 to 60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-3. Interventions: Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol (2 mg/kg). Propofol was manually injected in group 1 over a period of 5 s; in group 2 (120-s injection interval), and in group 3 (240-s injection interval), propofol was administered by an injection pump. After loss of consciousness, mask ventilation was performed with 100% oxygen. Bispectral index (BIS) was used to measure the hypnotic effect of propofol. After the decrease of BIS to the minimum value (i.e., maximum hypnotic effect) and the following increase of BIS to 60, the study period was finished and anesthesia was performed according to clinical criteria. Outcome Measures: We analyzed whether injection speed has an influence on the maximum hypnotic effect of a given dose of propofol (2 mg/kg). Results: BISmin marks the maximum electroencephalogram (EEG) effect of the propofol bolus as measured by the BIS. The lowest mean BISmin was measured in group 1 (28.7 +/- 10.3). In group 2, BISmin was 33.0 (+/- 13.9), and in group 3, BISmin was 36.4 (+/- 11.0). There were no significant differences between group 2 and groups 1 or 3, but there were significant differences between groups 1 and 3. In group 1, BISmin was reached after 102.91 s (+/- 44.20), in group 2 after 172.33 s (+/- 29.76), and in group 3 after 274.21 s (+/- 45.40). These differences were statistically significant for all comparisons. In summary, the lowest value for BISmin was achieved in the group with the fastest rate of propofol injection (group1, 5 s). The highest BISmin was obtained in the group with the slowest rate of injection (group 3, 240 s). The hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different among groups. Conclusions: The hypnotic peak effect of propofol is lower with extremely slow injection (240 s versus 5 s). For clinically usual injection rates (5 s and 120 s), there was no significant difference in propofol peak effect.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized controlled trial for anesthesia during gastroscopy: interactions between remimazolam and propofol in combination with sufentanil
    Lyu, Song
    Deng, Qingchung
    Lin, Weixin
    Wu, Xiaofang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 45 (04) : 857 - 863
  • [22] Transcranial motor evoked potentials during anesthesia with desflurane versus propofol - A prospective randomized trial
    Malcharek, M. J.
    Loeffler, S.
    Schiefer, D.
    Manceur, M. A.
    Sablotzki, A.
    Gille, J.
    Pilge, S.
    Schneider, G.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 126 (09) : 1825 - 1832
  • [23] Randomized controlled trial for anesthesia during gastroscopy: interactions between remimazolam and propofol in combination with sufentanil
    Song Lyu
    Qingchung Deng
    Weixin Lin
    Xiaofang Wu
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2023, 45 : 857 - 863
  • [24] Individual indicators of appropriate hypnotic level during propofol anesthesia: highest alpha power and effect-site concentrations of propofol at loss of response
    Kang, Hongling
    Mohamed, Hassan Mamdouh Hassan
    Takashina, Masaki
    Mori, Takahiko
    Fujino, Yuji
    Hagihira, Satoshi
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2017, 31 (04) : 502 - 509
  • [25] Individual indicators of appropriate hypnotic level during propofol anesthesia: highest alpha power and effect-site concentrations of propofol at loss of response
    Hongling Kang
    Hassan Mamdouh Hassan Mohamed
    Masaki Takashina
    Takahiko Mori
    Yuji Fujino
    Satoshi Hagihira
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2017, 31 : 502 - 509
  • [26] No evidence of memory function during anesthesia with propofol or isoflurane with close control of hypnotic state
    Kerssens, C
    Ouchi, T
    Sebel, PS
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 102 (01) : 57 - 62
  • [27] Effect of remimazolam and propofol anesthesia on autonomic nerve activities during Le Fort I osteotomy under general anesthesia: blinded randomized clinical trial
    Tsuji, Yuto
    Koshika, Kyotaro
    Ichinohe, Tatsuya
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2024, 24 (04) : 273 - 283
  • [28] EFFECT OF SPEED OF INJECTION ON THE DOSE REQUIRED TO INDUCE ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL
    VENN, PJH
    LOACH, AB
    COLLINS, PD
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 65 (02) : P287 - P287
  • [29] Effects of a fentanyl-propofol mixture on propofol injection pain: a randomized clinical trial
    Kizilcik, Nurcan
    Menda, Ferdi
    Bilgen, Sevgi
    Keskin, Ozgul
    Koner, Ozge
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (06) : 556 - 560
  • [30] Comparative efficacy of ciprofol and propofol in reducing respiratory depression during ERCP anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Juanhong
    Wang, Rui
    Ma, Xiaofang
    Zhu, Wenjing
    Zhang, Baoping
    Ma, Yuhu
    Liu, Yatao
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):